대한건축학회논문집 (Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea)

  • 제37권11호
  • /
  • Pages.291-300
  • /
  • 2021
  • /
  • 2733-6239(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2733-6247(eISSN)
대한건축학회 (Architectural Institute of Korea)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

CSTF 내부접합공법으로 내진보강된 실물 철근콘크리트 골조의 내진성능 평가

Seismic Performance Evaluation of Full-Size R/C Frame Strengthened by CSTF Internal Connection Method

  • 투고 : 2021.09.07
  • 심사 : 2021.11.08
  • 발행 : 2021.11.30
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

This study proposes a seismic retrofitting method using a concrete-filled steel tube frame (CSTF) system, a novel technique to improve the limitations of existing seismic strengthening methods. The CSTF method makes the most of the advantages of both concrete and steel pipes, thereby significantly improving constructability and increasing integration between the existing structure and the reinfoR/Cement joints. This method falls into the category of typical seismic retrofitting methods that focus on increasing strength, in which the required amount of seismic reinfoR/Cement can be easily estimated. Therefore, the method provides an easy solution to improving the strength of existing reinforcrd concrete (R/C) structures with non-seismic details that are prone to shear failure. In this study, a full-size two-story frames modeled from existing R/C structures with non-seismic details was subjected to pseudo-dynamic testing. As a result, the effect of the CSTF system, when applied to existing R/C structures, was examined and verified, especially as to its seismic retrofitting performance, i.e., restoring force characteristics, stiffness reinforcement, and seismic response control. The results showed that the RC frame with no retrofitting measures applied underwent shear failure at a seismic intensity of 200 cm/s2, the threshold applied in seismic design in Korea. In contrast, in the frame retrofitted with the CSTF system, only minor earthquake damage was observed, and even when the maximum seismic intensity (300 cm/s2) that may occur in Korean was applied, small-scale damage was observed. These results confirmed the validity of the seismic retrofitting method based on the CSFT system developed in the present study.

키워드

과제정보

이 연구는 국토교통부/국토교통과학기술진흥원의 지원에 의한 결과의 일부임. 과제번호:21CTAP-C153033-03

참고문헌

  1. Architectural Institute of Korea (AIK : 2018). Site Inspection and Damage Investigation of Buildings by Earthquakes in Gyoungju and Pohang, Seoul, Korea, p. 347.
  2. Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA 356 : 2000). Prestandard and Commentary for Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings, Washington, DC., p. 500.
  3. Hilber, H. M., Hughes, T. J., & Taylor, R. L. (1977). Improved numerical dissipation for time integration algorithms in structural dynamics. Earthquale Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 5(3), 283-292. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290050306
  4. Japan Building Disaster Prevention Association (JBDPA : 2017). Guideline for Seismic Strengthening of Existing Reinforced Concrete Buildings, Japan, p. 500.
  5. Japan Building Disaster Prevention Association (JBDPA : 2015). Standard for damage level classification, Tokyo, Japan, p. 450.
  6. Korea Design Standard 41 (KDS 41 : 2019). Korean design standard 41. Architectural Institute of Korea, Seoul, Korea.
  7. Korea Meteorological Administration (KMA : 2021). https://www.weather.go.kr.
  8. KS B 0801 (2017). Test pieces for tension test for metallic materials; Korean Industrial Standards, Korea.
  9. Lee, K. S. (2010). Seismic Capacity Requirement for Low-Rise R/C Buildings Controlled by Both Shear and Flexure, Journal of Advanced Concrete Technology, 8(1), 75-91. https://doi.org/10.3151/jact.8.75
  10. Lee, K. S., & Jung, J. S. A. (2018). Seismic Capacity of R/C Building Damaged by the 2016 Gyeongju Earthquake Based on the Non-linear Dynamic Analysis, Journal of the Korea Institute of Structural Maintenance and Inspection, 22(1), 137-146. https://doi.org/10.11112/JKSMI.2018.22.1.137
  11. Lee, K. S., Wi, J. D., Kim, Y. I., & Lee, H. H. (2009). Seismic Safety Evaluation of Korean R/C School Buildings Built in the 1980s, Journal of the Korea Institute for Structural Maintenance and Inspection, Vol. 13, No. 5, 1-11.
  12. Maeda, M., Nakano, Y., & Lee, K. S. (2004). Post-Earthquake Damage Evaluation for R/C Buildings Based on Residual Seismic Capacity, Proceedings of 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, 1179, Vancouver, Canada, 1-15.
  13. MTS (1999). Pseudodynamic Testing For 793 Controllers, MTS Systems Corporation, MN, USA, p. 40.
  14. Seismic Strengthening Research Group (SSRG : 2008). Seismic Strengthening of RC Buildings, Ohmsha Press, Tokyo, Japan, p. 230.
  15. Takanashi, K., Udagawa, K., & Tanaka, H. (1980). Pseudo-dynamic tests on a 2-storey steel frame by a computer-load test apparatus hybrid system. . In Proceedings of 7th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Istanbul, Turkey, 225-232.
  16. Tokyo Soki Kenkyujo Company (TSKC : 2021), Japan. https ://www.tml.jp/e/.