Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea (대한건축학회논문집)

Architectural Institute of Korea (대한건축학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Extraction and Analysis for Weight Based Core Alternative Evaluation Factors of Design VE Quality Model in the Educational Facility

교육시설 설계VE 품질모델의 가중치 기반 핵심 평가항목 도출 및 분석

  • 강미숙 ((주)중앙엔지니어링건축사사무소) ;
  • 양진국 (동의대학교 건설공학부 건축공학전공) ;
  • 허영기 (부산대학교 건설융합학부 건축공학전공) ;
  • 김대영 (부산대학교 건설융합학부 건축공학전공)
  • Received : 2021.09.29
  • Accepted : 2021.12.10
  • Published : 2021.12.30
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

In recent years, construction projects have become large and diversity in project type. Therefore, construction management system was introduced as a method of managing the entire construction process from the design phase to the construction phase and the maintenance phase. Among them, design VE for design management is actively applied mainly to public construction projects. In this respect, the background of this study is the need for improved practical application skills for repeatedly performed educational facility design VE. Accordingly, the purpose of this study is to extract the optimal alternative evaluation factors through case analysis and expert workshop of educational facility design VE. In addition, in this study, AHP analysis was performed on the extracted evaluation factors, and weights for each factor were presented. The presented results were confirmed to have practical efficiency and utilization through case verification. Therefore, it is expected to be able to support objective evaluation in the process of promoting educational facility design VE.

Keywords

References

  1. Cha, W., Jung, E., Lee, H., & Min, K. (2009). A computation of the Quality Model and the Additive Value through Check List Method at the Design VE Phase, University Student Conference Proceeding of Korea Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, pp. 142-145.
  2. Cho, H., Yang, J., & Lee, S. (2008). Improved Method for VE Items Selection by Analysing the Required Items of Stakeholder on the Apartment in Design Phase, Korea Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 9(4), 111-119.
  3. Dell'Isola, Alphonse J. (1997). Value Engineering: Practical Application for Design, Construction, Maintenance and Operation, R.S.Means Company Inc.
  4. Hwang, J., & Kim, B. (2009). Alternative Evaluation Method for Design VE Using Function and Quality Model, Conference Proceeding of Korea Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, pp. 119-122.
  5. Hyun, C., Kim, J., & Son, M. (2013). Multi-dimensional Quality Model for Value Engineering in Planning Phase of Public Construction Program, Korea Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 14(6), 61-69. https://doi.org/10.6106/KJCEM.2013.14.6.061
  6. Hyun, C., Lee, S., & Hong, T. (2008). Development of a Value Engineering Support Tool using CBR Methodology - Focused on Establishment of VE Objectives by Project Characteristics, Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea Structure & Construction, 24(6), 143-152.
  7. Jeong, H., Hyun, C., Hong, T., Sim, J., & Moon, H. (2010). Development of VE Suggestion Form for Post-management of Multi-family Housing VE Proposals, Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea Structure & Construction, 26(6), 111-120.
  8. Kang, M. (2021). Extraction of Optimal Alternative Evaluation Factors and Importance Analysis of Educational Facility Design VE, Pusan National University Master's thesis.
  9. Kwon, B., Lee, D., & Chun, J. (2001). A Study on the Improvement of Estimation Method of an Appraisal Standard to Select of the Subject in VE, Conference Proceeding of Korea Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, pp. 291-294.
  10. Lee, I., Hyun, C., Son, M., Kim, D., & Kim, Y. (2011). Development of Function Breakdown Structure of Building Element based on Performance for Idea Connection in Design VE, Korea Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 12(5), 12-22. https://doi.org/10.6106/KJCEM.2011.12.5.12
  11. Norton, B. R., & McElligot. W. C. (1995). Value Engineering in Construction, MacMillan.
  12. Park, H., Park, C., & Jung, W. (2014). A Study on the Improvement of the Design VE Process using VE Idea-DataBank System, Korea Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 15(1), 28-38. https://doi.org/10.6106/KJCEM.2014.15.1.028
  13. Park, I., Cho, K., Hyun, C., & Hong, T. (2009). Development of Customer Satisfaction VE Process during Design Phase using Axiomatic Design Theory, Korea Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 10(3), 111-121.
  14. University of Seoul, KOREA INSTITUTE of CIVIL ENGINEERING and BUILDING TECHNOLOGY. (2000). A Study on the Manual of Construction VE, KOREA INSTITUTE of CIVIL ENGINEERING and BUILDING TECHNOLOGY.
  15. Yang, J. (2013). Design Value Engineering Performance Report of Haeundae Elementary School Facility Remodeling Project, BUSAN HAEUNDAE DISTRICT OFFICE OF EDUCATION, pp. 11-12.
  16. Yang, J. (2014). Potential Value Improvement Target Choice Methodology (PVTCM) in Construction Projects, Korea Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 15(4), 11-19. https://doi.org/10.6106/KJCEM.2014.15.4.011
  17. Yang, J., & Kim, S. (2005). Improvement and Systematization of Pre-Study Work for Design Value Engineering in Construction Projects by Quality Function Deployment, Korea Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 6(4), 122-132.
  18. Yang, J., & Kim, S. (2014). Standard Establishment Model for Value Engineering Work in Construction Projects, Conference Proceeding of Korea Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, pp. 483-486.
  19. Yun, S., Son, B., & Min, K. (2009). Development of Design Value Engineering Process In the Subject Selection Phase using Classified Subject Selection Analysis Methods, Conference Proceeding of Korea Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, pp. 548-553.