Journal of Industrial Convergence (산업융합연구)

DAEHAN Society of Industrial Management (대한산업경영학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Relationship among Deans' Distributed Leadership, the Professor's Organizational Commitment, the Job Satisfaction and Organizational Effectiveness in Chinese Universities

중국 대학교 학장의 분산적 지도성, 조직헌신, 직무만족, 조직효과성의 구조관계

  • Jin, Ting (Dept. of Preschool Education, Henan Finance University) ;
  • Zhu, Hui-Qin (Dept. of Business Administration, JeonJu University)
  • 근정 (하남재정금융대학교 유아교육학과) ;
  • 제혜금 (전주대학교 경영학과)
  • Received : 2021.01.14
  • Accepted : 2021.02.20
  • Published : 2021.02.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to verify the structural relationship between the dean's distributed leadership, the professor's organizational commitment, job satisfaction, and organizational effectiveness perceived by Chinese university professors, and the mediating effect of organizational commitment and job satisfaction. For the experiment, a survey was conducted on 383 professors at three universities in Hebei, China. The results of this study are as follows. First, Deans' distributed leadership had a positive effect on organizational effectiveness, organizational commitment, and job satisfaction of professors. Second, Dean's distributed leadership showed a significant direct effects on organizational effectiveness. Third, organizational commitment and job satisfaction has a mediating effect in the relationship between distributed leadership and organizational effectiveness. Therefore, in order to increase the organizational effectiveness of Chinese universities, it is necessary to activate deans' distributed leadership and to improve the organizational commitment and job satisfaction of professors.

본 연구의 목적은 중국 현지 대학교 학장의 분산적 지도성이 조직효과성에 미치는 영향에서 조직헌신과 직무만족이 어떠한 매개효과를 나타내는지를 검증하는데 있다. 이를 위해 중국 하북지역의 3개 대학 383명의 교수를 대상으로 설문조사를 실시하였다. 본 연구의 결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 학장의 분산적 지도성은 조직효과성, 조직헌신, 교수의 직무만족에 긍정적인 영향을 주었다. 둘째, 학장의 분산적 지도성은 조직효과성에 직접적인 영향을 준다. 셋째, 조직헌신, 직무만족은 분산적 지도성과 조직효과성 관계에서 매개역할을 한다. 따라서 중국대학교의 조직효과성을 높이기 위해서는 학장의 분산적 지도성의 활성화와 함께 교수의 조직헌신과 직무만족 향상의 노력이 필요하다.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This article is revised of the doctoral dissertation of T. Jin(2020).

References

  1. Y. P. Yoon. (2017). The Fourth Industrial Revolution and the Future of University Education, Higher education, 197, 6-8.
  2. J. Y. Chung. (2008). A Study of an Autonomous School Policy. The Journal of Educational Administration, 26(2), 415-435.
  3. Spillane, J. P. (2006). Distributed Leadership. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  4. H. K. Kim & Y. H. Zoo. (2012). The Significance and challenges of distributed leadership practice for building school-based professional learning community. Journal of research in education, 43(1), 1-26.
  5. L. Yan & L. Wang. (2003). What is distributed leadership. Human Resources Development of China, 8, 54-55.
  6. D. Feng. (2012) .The Significance of Distributed Leadership in China's Context. Research in Educational Development, 12, 31-35.
  7. Y. Du. (2014). Research on leadership model based on distributed leadership theory. Master's thesis, Dalian University of Technology, China.
  8. Y. I. Choi. (2005). The Relationship between Teachers' Perception of School Principals' Transformational Leadership and Empowerment of the Teacher Group and School Organizational Effectiveness. Ph.D dissertation, Konkuk University, Seoul.
  9. Hoy, W. K. & Miskel, C. G. (2007). Educational administration: Theory, Research & Practice. New York: McGraw Hill.
  10. K. Y. Park & S. E. Lee. (2014). The Relationship among Distributed Leadership, Teacher Empowerment, and School Organizational Effectiveness at Elementary School. The Journal of Yeolin Education, 22(2), 145-163.
  11. Y. J. Oh. (1997). A Theoretical Design of Model for Measuring the Organizational Effectiveness of Schools. Journal of research in education, 9, 117-136.
  12. K. S. Kang & K. S. Kang. (2007). The relationship among School Principal's Transformational Leadership, Teacher's Empowerment, Followership, Trust in School Principal, and school Organization Effectiveness. Journal of Korean Education, 34(3), 75-101. DOI : 10.22804/jke.2007.34.3.004
  13. S. H. Oh & S. H. Park. (2007) An Analysis of the Research Trends on the School Organizational Effectiveness. The Journal of Educational Administration, 25(2), 21-44.
  14. Yukl, G. (1989). Leadership in organization. Englewood Cliffs, N J: Prentice-Hall.
  15. Leithwood, K., Mascall, B., Strauss, T., Sacks, R., Memon, N. & Yashkina, A. (2007). Distributing leadership to make schools smarter: Taking the ego out of the system. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 6(1), 37-67. https://doi.org/10.1080/15700760601091267
  16. Y. S. Lee. (2002). Implications of Recent Research on Principal's Instructional Leadership. The Journal of Korean Teacher Education, 19(2), 31-55.
  17. B. C. Kim. (2007). A Qualitative Case Study on the Process and Characteristics of Teacher's Life-long Development. The Journal of Korean Teacher Education, 24, 77-102. https://doi.org/10.24211/tjkte.2007.24.1.77
  18. D. H. Shin. (2009). Relationship between emotional leadership of school principals and teachers' dedication to teaching and effectiveness of school organization. Ph.D dissertation, SungKyunKwan University, Seoul.
  19. N. S. Go. (2013). A study on the structural effect of the principal's servant leadership on the school organization through teachers' commitment in Korean elementary schools. Ph.D dissertation, Konkuk University, Seoul.
  20. J. H. Ro. (2001). Conceptualizing and Measuring Job Satisfaction of Teachers. The Journal of Educational Administration, 19(2), 163-181.
  21. K. I. Woon. (2017). Impact of Organizational Commitment and Job Satisfaction in Vocational High School on Effectiveness. Master's thesis, Korea National University of Education Seoul.
  22. J. H. Kang. (2014). The effects of distributed leadership on teacher's job satisfaction and commitment. Korea University Master's thesis.
  23. E. H. Seo & M. S. Lee. (2002). A Study on the Job Satisfaction, Organizational Commitment and Turnover Intention of Kindergarten Teachers. The Journal of Korea Open Association for Early Childhood Education, 7(3), 155-170.
  24. J. E. Kim. (2006). Commitment to teaching and teacher's effectiveness. Ph.D dissertation, Hanyang University, Seoul.
  25. Y. H. Lee. (2012). A Study on the Structural Effects of the Principal's Servant Leadership on the Teachers' Job Satisfaction through the Teachers' Commitment in Korean Elementary Schools. Ph.D dissertation, Kookmin University, Seoul.
  26. Y. S. Ryu. (2009). Development of strategies & policy tasks for teacher leadership. The Journal of Educational Administration), 27(1), 281-301.
  27. H. J. Joo, T. Y. Kim & J. Y. Nam. (2012). A Meta-Analysis of the Relationship between Teachers' Leadership and School Effectiveness. The Journal of Korean Teacher Education, 29(1), 119-141. https://doi.org/10.24211/tjkte.2012.29.1.119
  28. S. Y. Moon. (2013). Development of Distributed Leadership diagnostic tools. Ph.D dissertation, Chungnam National University, DaeJeon.
  29. Mowday, R. T., Steers, R. M. & Porter, L. W. (1979). The measurement of organization commitment. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 14, 224-247. https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-8791(79)90072-1
  30. H. R. Lee. (2005). Relationship between teacher empowerment and organizational commitment. Master's thesis, Korea University, Seoul.
  31. Weiss, D. J., Dawis, R. V. & England, G. W. (1967). Manual for the Minnesota Satisfaction Questionnaire. Minnesota Studies in Vocational Rehabilitation, 22, 120.
  32. S. Y. Jeon. (1982). An Analytical Study on the Job Satisfaction of Teachers. Seoul: Korea Educational Association.
  33. K. H. Wang. (1983). The Identification, measurement, and diagnosis of school organization health. Ph.D dissertation, Chung-Ang University, Seoul.
  34. Y. A. Kim. (2013). A study on the effectiveness of service quality program (SQP) for the community rehabilitation center for the disabled. Master's thesis, Yonsei University, Seoul.
  35. Browne, M. W. & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds). Testing structural equations models (pp. 132-162). Beverley Hills, CA: Sage.
  36. Bagozzi, R. P. & Dholakia, U. (1999). Goal setting and goal striving in consumer behavior. Journal of Marketing, 63(l), 19-32. https://doi.org/10.1177/00222429990634s104
  37. Bagozzi, R. P. & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16(1), 74-94. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02723327
  38. Hair Jr., J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E. & Tatham, R. L. (2006) Multivariate Data Analysis. 6th Edition, Pearson Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
  39. B. R. Bea. (2009). Structural Equation Modeling Principles and Practice. Seoul: Chungram.