대한건축학회논문집 (Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea)

  • 제37권5호
  • /
  • Pages.77-88
  • /
  • 2021
  • /
  • 2733-6239(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2733-6247(eISSN)
대한건축학회 (Architectural Institute of Korea)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

주거침입절도 범행대상 선택 실험 도구로서의 가상현실과 이미지에 대한 비교 연구

Comparison between Virtual Reality and Image as an Experimental Tool for Studying Burglars' Target Selection of Residence

  • 투고 : 2021.04.16
  • 심사 : 2021.05.14
  • 발행 : 2021.05.30
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

This study was conducted to examine the advantages and possibilities of VR as a research method for residential burglary-related studies by comparing two different experimental tools, image and VR. A hypothetical situation of a motivated burglar looking for an appropriate criminal target within a typical detached house block in the suburbs was set up to investigate which architectural design variables the participants used as clues for decision-making. As a result of comparing the image and VR, there was a meaningful difference between the two test results. The same results were obtained from the variables related to the ease of intrusion, while variables related to the risk of detection were only significant in the VR experiment. In addition, it was revealed that the participants made decisions based on more specific judgments and comprehensively considered various environmental conditions in the VR experiment. This confirmed the advantages of VR as an experimental tool for investigating the residential burglars' target selection. Also, VR is expected to be utilized as a new experimental tool, especially in the field of environmental behavior that investigates human behavior in a specific space with various environmental variables.

키워드

과제정보

본 연구는 2019년도 정부(교육부)의 재원으로 한국연구재단의 지원을 받아 수행된 기초연구사업임 (NRF-2019R1A2C1085262).

참고문헌

  1. Agarbati, G. (2015). Burglary risk assessment of buildings: A semi-quantitative method [doctoral dissertation]. Ancona, Italy: Universita Politecnica Delle Marche.
  2. Bennett, T., & Wright, R. (1984). Burglars on burglary: Prevention and the offender. Aldershot, UK: Gower.
  3. Bernasco, W. (2011). Burglary. In M. Tonry (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of crime and public policy (pp. 165-190). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  4. Blevins, K. R., Kuhns, J. B., & Lee, S. (2012). Understanding decisions to burglarize from the offender's perspective. NC: University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Department of Criminal Justice & Criminology.
  5. Brantingham, P. J., & Brantingham, P. L. (1984). Patterns in crime. New York: Macmillan.
  6. Bullock, K., Chowdhury, R., & Hollings, P. (2009). Public concern about organized crime. Research Reports (Vol. 16). London: Home Office.
  7. Ceccato, V. A. (2016). Rural crime and community safety. Abingdon, UK, NY: Routledge.
  8. Comeau, M., & Klofas, J. (2014). Repeat and near-repeat burglary victimization in Rochester, NY. Literature review: Motivations to commit burglary and target selection. Rochester, NY: Center for Public Safety Initiatives.
  9. Cornish, D. B., & Clarke, R. V. (Eds.). (1986). The reasoning criminal: Rational choice perspectives on offending. Springer-Verlag.
  10. Coupe, T., & Blake, L. (2011). The effects of target characteristics on the sighting and arrest of offenders at burglary emergencies. Security Journal, 24(2), 157-178. https://doi.org/10.1057/sj.2009.23
  11. Cromwell, P. F., Olson, J. N., & Avary, D. (1991). Breaking and entering: An ethnographic analysis of burglary (Vol. 8). Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
  12. Garcia-Retamero, R., & Dhami, M. K. (2009). Take-the-best in expert-novice decision strategies for residential burglary. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16(1), 163-169. https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.16.1.163
  13. Ham-Rowbottom, K. A., Gifford, R., & Shaw, K. T. (1999). Defensible space theory and the police: Assessing the vulnerability of residences to burglary. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 19(2), 117-129. https://doi.org/10.1006/jevp.1998.0108
  14. Homel, R., Macintyre, S., & Wortley, R. (2013). How burglars decide on targets: A computer-based scenario approach. In B. Leclerc, & R. Wortley (Eds.), Cognition and crime: Offender decision-making and script analyses. Crime Science Series (pp. 26-47). London: Routledge.
  15. Hwang, Y., Jung, S., Lee, J., & Jeong, Y. (2017). Predicting residential burglaries based on building elements and offender behavior: Study of a row house area in Seoul, Korea. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 61, 94-107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2016.09.004
  16. Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. Macmillan.
  17. Kim, S., Kim, D., & Jung, S. (2017). Analysis of the effect of cul-de-sacs' permeability factors in low-rise residential areas on burglary. Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering, 16(3), 487-493. https://doi.org/10.3130/jaabe.16.487
  18. Korean National Police Agency. (2018). Korean Police Crime Statistics in 2017. Retrieved March 23, 2021 from https://www.police.go.kr/www/open/publice/publice03_2018.jsp
  19. Langton, S. H., & Steenbeek, W. (2017). Residential burglary target selection: An analysis at the property-level using Google Street View. Applied Geography, 86, 292-299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2017.06.014
  20. Lee, K., & Lee, J. (2008). Cross-cultural analysis of perceptions of environmental characteristics in the target selection process for residential burglary. Crime Prevention and Community Safety, 10(1), 19-35. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.cpcs.8150055
  21. Macintyre, S. D. (2001). Burglar decision making [doctoral dissertation]. Brisbane, Australia: Griffith University.
  22. Maguire, M., & Bennett, T. (1982). Burglary in a dwelling: The offence, the offender, and the victim. London: Heinemann.
  23. Meenaghan, A., Nee, C., Van Gelder, J. L., Otte, M., & Vernham, Z. (2018). Getting closer to the action: using the virtual enactment method to understand burglary. Deviant Behavior, 39(4), 437-460. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639625.2017.1407104
  24. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport. (2017). 2017 Korea Housing Survey. Retrieved March 23, 2021 from http://stat.molit.go.kr/portal/cate/statView.do?hRsId=327&hFormId=5403&hDivEng=&month_yn=
  25. Montoya, L., Junger, M., & Ongena, Y. (2016). The relation between residential property and its surroundings and day- and night-time residential burglary. Environment and Behavior, 48(4), 515-549. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916514551047
  26. Nee, C. (2015). Understanding expertise in burglars: From pre-conscious scanning to action and beyond. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 20, 53-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2014.12.006
  27. Nee, C., & Meenaghan, A. (2006). Expert decision making in burglars. British Journal of Criminology, 46(5), 935-949. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azl013
  28. Nee, C., & Taylor, M. (1988). Residential burglary in the Republic of Ireland: A situational perspective. The Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 27(2), 105-116. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2311.1988.tb00609.x
  29. Nee, C., & Ward, T. (2015). Review of expertise and its general implications for correctional psychology and criminology. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 20, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2014.12.002
  30. Nee, C., van Gelder, J. L., Otte, M., Vernham, Z., & Meenaghan, A. (2019). Learning on the job: Studying expertise in residential burglars using virtual environments. Criminology, 57(3), 481-511. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9125.12210
  31. Nee, C., White, M., Woolford, K., Pascu, T., Barker, L., & Wainwright, L. (2015). New methods for examining expertise in burglars in natural and simulated environments: Preliminary findings. Psychology, Crime and Law, 21(5), 507-513. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2014.989849
  32. Nisbett, R. E., & Wilson, T. D. (1977). Telling more than we can know: verbal reports on mental processes. Psychological review, 84(3), 231. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.3.231
  33. Park, S. Y., & Lee, K. H. (2021). Burglars' Choice of Intrusion Routes: A Virtual Reality Experimental Study. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 101582.
  34. Peeters, M. (2013). Assessing the vulnerability of targets for burglary: Creating a multilevel observational instrument. In Crime, violence, justice and social order: Monitoring contemporary security issues (Vol. 1). Maklu.
  35. Peeters, M. P., Van Daele, S., & Vander Beken, T. (2018). Adding to the mix: A multilevel analysis of residential burglary. Security Journal, 31(2), 389-409. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41284-017-0106-1
  36. Prosecution Service. (2018). Analytical Statistics on Crime. Retrieved March 23, 2021 from http://www.spo.go.kr/site/spo/crimeAnalysis.do
  37. Roth, J. J., & Roberts, J. J. (2017). Now, later, or not at all: Personal and situational factors impacting burglars' target choices. Journal of Crime and Justice, 40(2), 119-137. https://doi.org/10.1080/0735648X.2015.1078253
  38. Sanders, A. N., Kuhns, J. B., & Blevins, K. R. (2017). Exploring and understanding differences between deliberate and impulsive male and female burglars. Crime & Delinquency, 63(12), 1547-1571. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128716660519
  39. Snook, B., Dhami, M. K., & Kavanagh, J. M. (2011). Simply criminal: Predicting burglars' occupancy decisions with a simple heuristic. Law and Human Behavior, 35(4), 316-326. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-010-9238-0
  40. Taylor, M., & Nee, C. (1988). The role of cues in simulated residential burglary. British Journal of Criminology, 28(3), 396-401. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.bjc.a047736
  41. Townsley, M., Birks, D., Bernasco, W., Ruiter, S., Johnson, S. D., & White, G. (2015). Burglar target selection: A cross-national comparison. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 52(1), 3-31. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427814541447
  42. Van Gelder, J. L., Nee, C., Otte, M., Demetriou, A., van Sintemaartensdijk, I., & van Prooijen, J. W. (2017). Virtual burglary: Exploring the potential of virtual reality to study burglary in action. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 54(1), 29-62. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427816663997
  43. Van Sintemaartensdijk, I., Van Gelder, J. L., Van Prooijen, J. W., Nee, C., Otte, M., & Van Lange, P. (2020). Mere presence of informal guardians deters burglars: A virtual reality study. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 1-20.
  44. Vandeviver, C., Neutens, T., Van Daele, S., Geurts, D., & Vander Beken, T. (2015). A discrete spatial choice model of burglary target selection at the house-level. Applied Geography, 64, 24-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2015.08.004
  45. Warr, M. (2000). Fear of crime in the United States: Avenues for research and policy. Criminal Justice, 4(4), 451-489.
  46. Wright, R., & Decker, S. H. (1994). Burglars on the job: Streetlife and residential break-ins. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
  47. Wright, R., & Logie, R. H. (1988). How young house burglars choose targets. The Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 27(2), 92-104. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2311.1988.tb00608.x
  48. Wright, R., Logie, R. H., & Decker, S. H. (1995). Criminal expertise and offender decision making: An experimental study of the target selection process in residential burglary. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 32(1), 39-53. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427895032001002