DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effects of dietary hatchery by-products on growth performance, relative organ weight, plasma measurements, immune organ index, meat quality, and tibia characteristics of broiler chickens

  • Choi, Won Jun (Department of Animal Science and Technology, Chung-Ang University) ;
  • Kim, Jong Hyuk (Department of Animal Science and Technology, Chung-Ang University) ;
  • Han, Gi Ppeum (Department of Animal Science and Technology, Chung-Ang University) ;
  • Kwon, Chan Ho (Department of Animal Science and Technology, Chung-Ang University) ;
  • Kil, Dong Yong (Department of Animal Science and Technology, Chung-Ang University)
  • Received : 2020.11.05
  • Accepted : 2020.12.26
  • Published : 2021.07.01

Abstract

Objective: The objective of the current study was to investigate the effects of dietary hatchery by-products (HBPs) as a replacement of fish meal (FM) on growth performance, relative organ weight, plasma measurements, immune organ index, meat quality, and tibia characteristics of broiler chickens. Methods: A total of 720 broiler chickens (3 d of age) were randomly allotted to 1 of 9 treatments with 8 replicates. Each replicate consisted of 5 male and 5 female birds. The basal diet was formulated to contain 5.0% commercial FM, whereas eight treatment diets were prepared by replacing 25%, 50%, 75%, or 100% of FM in the basal diet with infertile eggs (IFE) or a mixture of various HBPs (MIX); therefore, the inclusion levels of IFE or MIX in the experimental diets were 1.25%, 2.50%, 3.75%, or 5.00%. The diets and water were provided on an ad libitum basis for 32 d. Results: Increasing inclusion levels of IFE as a replacement of FM in diets had no effects on growth performance, plasma measurements, immune organ index, and tibia characteristics of broiler chickens. Increasing inclusion levels of IFE in diets increased (linear, p<0.05) meat lightness (L*) but decreased (linear, p<0.05) meat redness (a*). The breast meat pH at 1-h postmortem was increased (linear, p<0.05) by increasing inclusion levels of IFE in diets. Likewise, increasing inclusion levels of MIX in diets had no effects on growth performance, relative organ weight, plasma measurements, immune organ index, and tibia characteristics. However, increasing inclusion levels of MIX in diets increased (linear, p<0.05) 1-h postmortem pH but decreased (linear, p<0.05) 24-h postmortem pH of breast meat. Increasing inclusion levels of MIX in diets decreased (linear, p<0.05) thiobarbituric acid reactive substances values of breast meat. Conclusion: Both IFE and MIX are suitable alternatives to FM as protein ingredients in broiler diets.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This research was carried out with the support of the Cooperative Research Program for Agriculture Science and Technology Development (Project No. PJ01252804), Rural Development Administration, Republic of Korea. This research was also supported by the Chung-Ang University Graduate Research Scholarship in 2020.

References

  1. Abiola SS, Onunkwor EK. Replacement value of hatchery waste meal for fish meal in layer diets. Bioresour Technol 2004;95:103-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2004.02.001
  2. Choi HS, Park GH, Kim JH, Ji SY, Kil DY. Determination of calcium and phosphorus utilization in various hatchery byproducts for broiler chickens. Korean J Agric Sci 2019;46:361-8. https://doi.org/10.7744/kjoas.20190023
  3. Ratriyanto A, Suprayogui WPS, Atikah R. Infertile egg powder as a potential feedstuff for starter broilers. IOP Conf Ser: Earth Environ Sci 2020;518:012005. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/518/1/012005
  4. Aviagen. Ross 308 broiler: nutrition specifications. Huntsville, AL, USA: Aviagen Inc; 2018. http://en.aviagen.com/
  5. Chen HL, Li DF, Chang BY, Gong LM, Dai JG, Yi GF. Effects of Chinese herbal polysaccharides on the immunity and growth performance of young broilers. Poult Sci 2003;82:364-70. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/82.3.364
  6. Lee SJ, Lee SY, Kim GD, GB Kim, SK Jin, SJ Hur. Effects of self-carbon dioxide-generation material for active packaging on pH, water-holding capacity, meat color, lipid oxidation and microbial growth in beef during cold storage. J Sci Food Agric 2017;97:3642-8. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.8223
  7. Watson BC, Matthews JO, Southern LL, Shelton JL. The effects of phytase on growth performance and intestinal transit time of broilers fed nutritionally adequate diets and diets deficient in calcium and phosphorus. Poult Sci 2006;85:493-7. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/85.3.493
  8. Woyengo TA, Emiola IA, Kim IH, Nyachoti CM. Bioavailability of phosphorus in two cultivars of pea for broiler chicks. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci 2016;29:396-403. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.15.0299
  9. Kurtoglu F, Kurtoglu V, Celik I, Kececi T, Nizamlioglu M. Effects of dietary boron supplementation on some biochemical parameters, peripheral blood lymphocytes, splenic plasma cells and bone characteristics of broiler chicks given diets with adequate or inadequate cholecalciferol (vitamin D3) content. Br Poult Sci 2005;46:87-96. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071660400024001
  10. Shaw AL, Blake JP, Moran ET. Effects of flesh attachment on bone breaking and of phosphorus concentration on performance of broilers hatched from young and old flocks. Poult Sci 2010;89:295-302. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2009-00402
  11. Abiola SS, Radebe NE, Westhuizen CVD, Umesiobi DO. Whole hatchery waste meal as alternative protein and calcium sources in broiler diets. Archiv Zootec 2012;61:229-34. https://doi.org/10.4321/S0004-05922012000200007
  12. Dhaliwal APS, Shingari BK, Sapra KL. Chemical composition of hatchery waste. Pak Vet J 1997;17:168-70.
  13. Rasool S, Rehan M, Haq A, Alam MZ. Preparation and nutritional evaluation of hatchery waste meal for broilers. AsianAustralas J Anim Sci 1999;12:554-7. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.1999.554
  14. Beski SSM, Swick RA, Iji PA. Specialized protein products in broiler chicken nutrition: a review. Anim Nutr 2015;1:47-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aninu.2015.05.005
  15. Piotrowska A, Burlikowska K, Szymeczko R. Changes in blood chemistry in broiler chickens during the fattening period. Folia Biol 2011;59:183-7. https://doi.org/10.3409/fb59_3-4.183-187
  16. Azadmanesh V, Jahanian R. Effect of supplemental lipotropic factors on performance, immune responses, serum metabolites and liver health in broiler chicks fed on high-energy diets. Anim Feed Sci Technol 2014;195:92-100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2014.06.004
  17. Adriani L, Nugraha P, Marin M. The effect of granting fermented milk, fermented soy milk, and the combination against creatinine and blood glucose levels on broiler. AgroLife Sci J 2017;6:9-15.
  18. Mehdipour M, Shargh MS, Dastar B, Hassani S. Effects of different levels of hatchery wastes on the performance, carcass and tibia ash and some blood parameters in broiler chicks. Pak J Biol Sci 2009;12:1272-6. https://doi.org/10.3923/pjbs.2009.1272.1276
  19. Awad WA, Ghareeb K, Abdel-Raheem S, Bohm J. Effects of dietary inclusion of probiotic and synbiotic on growth performance, organ weights, and intestinal histomorphology of broiler chickens. Poult Sci 2009;88:49-56. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2008-00244
  20. Elaroussi MA, Mohamed FR, Elgendy MS, El Barkouky EM, Abdou AM, Hatab MH. Ochratoxicosis in broiler chickens: functional and histological changes in target organs. Int J Poult Sci 2008;7:414-22. https://doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2008.414.422
  21. Goo D, Kim JH, Choi HS, Park GH, Han GP, Kil DY. Effect of stocking density and sex on growth performance, meat quality, and intestinal barrier function in broiler chickens. Poult Sci 2019;98:1153-60. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pey491
  22. Wang JP, Lee JH, Yoo JS, Cho JH, Kim HJ, Kim IH. Effects of phenyllactic acid on growth performance, intestinal microbiota, relative organ weight, blood characteristics, and meat quality of broiler chicks. Poult Sci 2010;89:1549-55. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2009-00235
  23. Sacranie A, Svihus B, Denstadli V, Moen B, Iji PA, Choct M. The effect of insoluble fiber and intermittent feeding on gizzard development, gut motility, and performance of broiler chickens. Poult Sci 2012;91:693-700. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2011-01790
  24. Kheravii SK, Swick RA, Choct M, Wu S-B. Dietary sugarcane bagasse and coarse particle size of corn are beneficial to performance and gizzard development in broilers fed normal and high sodium diets. Poult Sci 2017;96:4006-16. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pex225
  25. Pearse G. Normal structure, function and histology of the thymus. Toxicol Pathol 2006;34:504-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/01926230600865549
  26. Nagy N, Olah I. Experimental evidence for the ectodermal origin of the epithelial anlage of the chicken bursa of Fabricius. Development 2010;137:3019-23. https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.055194
  27. Guo Y, Jiang R, Su A, et al. Identification of genes related to effects of stress on immune function in the spleen in a chicken stress model using transcriptome analysis. Mol Immunol 2020;124:180-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molimm.2020.06.004
  28. Attia YA, Al-Khalaifah H, Ibrahim MS, Abd Al-Hamid AE, Al-Harthi MA, El-Naggar A. Blood hematological and biochemical constituents, antioxidant enzymes, immunity and lymphoid organs of broiler chicks supplemented with propolis, bee pollen and mannan oligosaccharides continuously or intermittently. Poult Sci 2017;96:4182-92. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pex173
  29. Chen C, Li J, Zhang H, et al. Effects of a probiotic on the growth performance, intestinal flora, and immune function of chicks infected with Salmonella pullorum. Poult Sci 2020;99:5316-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2020.07.017
  30. Chen Y, Gu Y, Zhao H, Zhang H, Zhou Y. Effects of graded levels of dietary squalene supplementation on the growth performance, plasma biochemical parameters, antioxidant capacity, and meat quality in broiler chickens. Poult Sci 2020;99:5915-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2020.08.042
  31. Chang Q, Lu Y, Lan R. Chitosan oligosaccharide as an effective feed additive to maintain growth performance, meat quality, muscle glycolytic metabolism, and oxidative status in yellow-feather broilers under heat stress. Poult Sci 2020;99:4824-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2020.06.071
  32. Kim HJ, Kim HJ, Jeon JJ, et al. Comparison of the quality characteristics of chicken breast meat from conventional and animal welfare farms under refrigerated storage. Poult Sci 2020;99:1788-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2019.12.009
  33. Swatland HJ. How pH causes paleness or darkness in chicken breast meat. Meat Sci 2008;80:396-400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2008.01.002
  34. Duclos MJ, Berri C, Le Bihan-Duval E. Muscle growth and meat quality. J Appl Poult Res 2007;16:107-12. https://doi.org/10.1093/japr/16.1.107
  35. The French National Institute for Agricultural Research (INRA). Tables of composition and nutritional value of feed materials. Wageningen, The Netherlands: Wageningen Academic Publishers; 2004.
  36. Valentini J, Da Silva AS, Fortuoso BF, et al. Chemical composition, lipid peroxidation, and fatty acid profile in meat of broilers fed with glycerol monolaurate additive. Food Chem 2020;330:127187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2020.127187
  37. Vaithiyanathan S, Naveena BM, Muthukumar M, et al. Biochemical and physicochemical changes in spent hen breast meat during postmortem aging. Poult Sci 2008;87:180-6. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2007-00068
  38. Choi HS, Goo D, Pitargue FM, et al. Determination of metabolizable energy values for various hatchery by-products for broiler chickens. In: Proceedings of Korean Society of Poultry Science 2017; 2017 Nov 9-10; Jeonbuk, KR. Gangwon, KR: Korean Society of Poultry Science; 2017. 129 p.
  39. Latimer GW; AOAC International. Official methods of analysis of AOAC International. 19th ed. Gaithersburg, MD, USA: AOAC International; 2012

Cited by

  1. Comparative effects of dietary functional nutrients on growth performance, meat quality, immune responses, and stress biomarkers in broiler chickens raised under heat stress conditions vol.34, pp.11, 2021, https://doi.org/10.5713/ab.21.0230
  2. Determination of metabolizable energy and amino acid digestibility in various hatchery byproducts for broiler chickens vol.101, pp.1, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2021.101544