대한건축학회논문집 (Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea)

  • 제37권6호
  • /
  • Pages.137-148
  • /
  • 2021
  • /
  • 2733-6239(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2733-6247(eISSN)
대한건축학회 (Architectural Institute of Korea)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

유럽 사례분석을 통한 어반 리빙랩(Urban Living Lab) 추진전략 연구

Development of Strategies for Implementing Urban Living Lab: European Case Studies

  • 손현식 (고려대 건축학과 도시계획 및 도시설계 전공) ;
  • 민병학 (고려대 건축학과 도시계획 및 도시설계 전공) ;
  • 오주석 (고려대 스마트도시학부) ;
  • 김세용 (고려대 건축학과)
  • 투고 : 2021.03.27
  • 심사 : 2021.06.07
  • 발행 : 2021.06.30
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

This study examined the strategies for implementing urban living labs through an analysis of the ways in which the concept of urban living lab is portrayed through theoretical discussions, and an analysis of European cases based on the key components of urban living lab. Results of analytical implications of the three cases, including De Ceuvel, Living Lab Vuores, NBS City Lab showed that urban living lab is used to develop urban spaces or solve urban problems based on citizen participation, not user participation, and the role of public sectors such as legal and policy support, and financing is emphasized in contrast with traditional living lab. In order to guarantee the success of an urban living lab, various participation methods for social inclusion and educational programs to strengthen the capabilities of participants are required. The nuances of the urban context and local demands should be taken into close consideration and a wide-area network is necessary for spatial expansion of individual project outcomes. In addition, there should be a regulatory sandbox system focusing on urban living lab, a cooperative system between public departments and a strategic approach to financial support. This study contributes to the literature by expand the discussion on urban living labs in Korea through an analysis of urban living lab projects that are attracting global attention.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Baccarne, B., Schuurman, D., Mechant, P., & De Marez, L. (2014). The role of urban living labs in a smart city. Proceedings of XXV ISPIM Innovation Conference, 1-16. Retrieved November 1, 2020 from https://biblio.ugent.be/publication/5646684/file/5646725.pdf
  2. Bergvall-Kareborn, B., Eriksson, C. I., Stahlbrost, A., & Svensson, J. (2009). A milieu for innovation: defining living labs. Proceedings of the 2nd ISPIM Innovation Symposium. Retrieved October 20, 2020 from http://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1004774/FULLTEXT01.pdf
  3. Buhr, K., Federley, M., & Karlsson, A. (2016). Urban living labs for sustainability in suburbs in need of modernization and social uplift. Technology Innovation Management Review, 6(1), 27-34. https://doi.org/10.22215/timreview958
  4. Bulkeley, H., Coenen, L., Frantzeskaki, N., Hartmann, C., Kronsell, A., Mai, L., Marvin, S., McCormick, K., van Steenbergen, F., & Voytenko Palgan, Y. (2016). Urban living labs: governing urban sustainability transitions. Current Opinion Environmental Sustainability, 22(2016), 13-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2017.02.003
  5. Cellina, F., Castri, R., Diethart, M., Hoflehner, T., Da Schio, N., & Dijk, M. (2018). Constraints on upscaling and social inclusion in smart city living lab experiments and ways to anticipate them: lessons from four "smarter" labs. Proceedings of Open Living Lab Days 2018, ENoLL, 11-25.
  6. Cho, Y., & Oh, M. (2019). Smart City Living Lab Promotion Strategy (Report No. Research Support 2019-001). Land & Housing Institute.
  7. Chang, H., & Kim, K. (2019). Policy directions for citizen-led smart city based on living lab. Journal of the Korean Urban Geographical Society, 22(3), 41-53. https://doi.org/10.21189/JKUGS.22.3.3
  8. Chroneer, D., Stahlbrost, A., & Habibipour, A. (2019). Urban living labs: towards an integrated understanding of their key components. Technology Innovation Management Review, 9(3), 50-62. https://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1224
  9. Coenen, T., van der Graaf, S., & Walravens, N. (2014). Firing up the city - a smart city living lab methodology. Interdisciplinary Studies Journal, 3(4), 1-11.
  10. Cuomo, F., Ravazzai, S., & Bertolini, L. (2020). Transformative urban living labs: towards a circular economy in Amsterdam and Turin. Sustainability, 12(18), 7651-7670. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12187651
  11. De Ceuvel. (n.d.a). Organization. Retrieved January 23, 2020 from https://deceuvel.nl/en/organisatie
  12. De Ceuvel. (n.d.b). Sustainability. Retrieved January 23, 2020 from https://deceuvel.nl/en/about/sustainable-technology/
  13. ENoLL. (n.d.). About Us. Retrieved October 19, 2020 from https://enoll.org/about-us/
  14. Eurbanlab. (2012). Eurbanlab Flyer. Eurbanlab. Retrieved February 5, 2020 from https://descargas.five.es/archivos/Eurbanlab_Flyer.pdf
  15. Evans, J., & Karvonen, A. (2012). Living laboratories for sustainability: exploring the politics and epistemology of urban transition. In Bulkeley, H., Castan Broto, V., Hodson, M., & Marvin, S. (Eds.). Cities and Low Carbon Transitions. London: Routledge, 126-141.
  16. Gemeente Eindhoven. (2017). Routeplanner Samenspraak Projectontwikkelaars. Gemeente Eindhoven.
  17. Giulietti, M., Le Coq, C., Willems, B., & Anaya, K. (2019). Smart Consumers in the Internet of Energy: Flexibility Markets and Services from Distributed Energy Resources. Centre on Regulation in Europe.
  18. Han, K., & Lee, J. (2019). A Study on deriving key characteristics and factors of urban living lab. Proceedings of 2019 S/S Academic Conference of the Urban Design Institute of Korea. Urban Design Institute of Korea. 363-372.
  19. Hotel Asile Flottant. (n.d.). De Ceuvel. Retrieved January 30, 2020 from https://www.asileflottant.com/De-ceuvel
  20. Jo, J. (2020). Living lab key components and their effects for the smart urban-regeneration projects - in-depth case study on the living lab in Goyang city. Journal of the Urban Design Institute of Korea Urban Design, 21(5), 51-70. https://doi.org/10.38195/judik.2020.10.21.5.51
  21. JPI Urban Europe. (2015). Transition Towards Sustainable and Liveable Urban Futures: The Strategic Research and Innovation Agenda of Urban Europe. JPI Urban Europe.
  22. Juujarvi, S., & Lund, V. (2016). Enhancing early innovation in an urban living lab: lessons from Espoo, Finland. Technology Management Review, 6(1), 17-26.
  23. Juujarvi, S., & Pesso, K. (2013). Actor roles in an urban living lab: what can we learn from Suurpelto, Finland? Technology Innovation Management Review, 3(11), 22-27. https://doi.org/10.22215/timreview742
  24. Karvonen, A., & van Heur, B. (2014). Urban laboratories: experiments in reworking cities. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 38(2), 379-392. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12075
  25. Kim, L. (2020). Principles and application of nature-based solutions (NBS). Water for Future, 53(3), 8-20.
  26. Lee, E., & Park, E. (2019). A preliminary study on the application of living lab in smart urban regeneration project. Proceedings of Annual Conference of the Architectural Institute of Korea, 39(1), 692-695.
  27. Leminen, S., Westerlund, M., & Nystrom, A. (2012). Living labs as open-innovation networks. Technology Innovation Management Review, 2(9), 6-11. https://doi.org/10.22215/timreview602
  28. Maciulyte, E., Cioffi, M., Zappia, F., Duce, E., Ferrari, A., de Mendoca, M., Loriga, G., Suska, P., Paz, B. L. V., Zangani, D., & Bult, P. (2018). Business Models & Financing Strategies. UNaLab.
  29. McCormick, K., & Hartmann, C. (2017). The Emerging Landscape of Urban Living Labs: Characteristics, Practices and Examples. GUST.
  30. Menny, M., Voytenko Palgan, Y., & McCormick, K. (2018). Urban living labs and the role of users in co-creation. GAIA - Ecological Perspectives on Science and Society, 27(1), 68-77. https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.27.S1.14
  31. Metabolic. (2013). Cleantech Playground. Metabolic.
  32. Metabolic. (2018). Amsterdam's Circular Living Lab: What Organisations Can Learn from De Ceuvel. Metabolic. Retrieved 23 December, 2020 from https://www.metabolic.nl/news/amsterdams-circular-living-lab-organisations-learn-from-de-ceuvel/
  33. Nesi, P., & Paolucci, M. (2018). Supporting living lab with life cycle and tools for smart city environments. Proceedings of the 24th International DMS Conference on Visualization and Visual Languages, DMSVIVA, Retrieved January 17, 2020 from http://ksiresearchorg.ipage.com/seke/dms18paper/dms18paper_19.pdf
  34. Nesti, G. (2018). Co-production for innovation: the urban living lab experience. Policy and Society, 37(3), 310-325. https://doi.org/10.1080/14494035.2017.1374692
  35. Nevens, F., Frantzeskaki, N., Gorissen, L., & Loorbach, D. (2013). Urban transition labs: co-creating transformative action for sustainable cities. Journal of Cleaner Production, 50(2013), 111-122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.12.001
  36. Park, J., Park., J, & Nam, K. (2019). A study on the activation of citizen participation through living lab. Journal of the Korean Regional Science Association, 35(3), 33-44. https://doi.org/10.22669/KRSA.2019.35.3.033
  37. Postmes, L., & van Dinter, M. (2020). UNaLab NBS in the City of Eindhoven. ENoLL. Retrieved November 17, 2020 from https://vimeo.com/413029522
  38. Sarkilahti, M., (2020). UNaLab NBS in the City of Tampere. ENoLL. Retrieved November 13, 2020 from https://vimeo.com/401028205
  39. Schliwa, G., & McCormick, K. (2018). Living labs: users, citizens and transitions. In Evans, J., Karvonen, A., & Raven, R. (Eds.). The Experimental City. Oxfordshire: Routledge, 163-178.
  40. Scholl, C., & Kemp, R. (2016). City labs as vehicles for innovation in urban planning processes. Urban Planning, 1(4), 89-102. https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v1i4.749
  41. Schuetze, C. F. (2014, November 19). Building a comm unity on polluted land. The New York Times. Retrieved January 11, 2020 from https://www.nytimes.com/2014/11/20/business/energy-environment/ex-shipyard-in-amsterdam-houses-shops-and-offices.html
  42. Song, W., Jeong, S., Han, K., Seong, J., & Kim, J. (2017). Technology commercialization model of public R&D based on living labs. Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society, 20(2), 458-486. https://doi.org/10.35978/jktis.2017.06.20.2.458
  43. Song, W., & Seong, J. (2019). Socio-technical system transition approach and transformative regional innovation: exploratory study. Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society, 22(6), 1004-1029. https://doi.org/10.35978/jktis.2019.12.22.6.1004
  44. Tamminen, P. (2017). Urban sustainability in Vuores, a new housing development in Tampere. Proceedings of FIG Working Week 2017. Retrieved January 20, 2020 from https://www.fig.net/resources/proceedings/fig_proceedings/fig2012/papers/ts05d/TS05D_tamminen_5717.pdf
  45. UNaLab. (2020). Innovation Vouchers to Encourage Citizens' NBS Initiatives in Tampere. Retrieved January 6, 2021 from https://unalab.eu/en/news/innovation-vouchers-encourage-citizens-nbs-initiatives-tampere
  46. UNaLab. (n.d.a). Our Cities. Retrieved December 13, 2020 from https://unalab.eu/en/our-cities
  47. UNaLab. (n.d.b). City-Tampere. Retrieved November 13, 2020 from https://unalab.eu/en/project-partners/city-tampere
  48. United Nations. (2015). Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. UN.
  49. United Nations. (2017). New Urban Agenda. UN.
  50. van Dinter, M., & Habibipour, A. (2019). Co-creation Workshops Report. UNaLab.
  51. van Winden, W., Oskam, I., Schrama, W., & van Dijck, E. (2016). Organising Smart City Projects: Lessons learned from Amsterdam. HvA/Eburon.
  52. Veeckman, C., & van der Graaf, S. (2015). The city as living laboratory: empowering citizens with the Citadel toolkit. Technology Innovation Management Review, 5(3), 6-17. https://doi.org/10.22215/timreview877
  53. Voytenko, Y., McCormick, K., Evans, J., & Schliwa, G. (2016). Urban living labs for sustainability and low carbon cities in Europe: towards a research agenda. Journal of Cleaner Production, 123(2016), 45-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.08.053
  54. Wendling, L., Rinta-Hiiro, V., Jermakka, J., Fatima, Z., Rudenhausen, M. C., Ascenso, A., Miranda, A. I., Roebeling, P., Martins, R., & Mendonca, R. (2019). Performance and Impact Monitoring of Nature-Based Solutions. UNaLab.