Asia Pacific Journal of Corpus Research (아시아태평양코퍼스연구)

Institute for Corpus Research (국립인천대학교 코퍼스연구소)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Fillers in the Hong Kong Corpus of Spoken English (HKCSE)

  • Seto, Andy (The Hong Kong Institute of Vocational Education)
  • Received : 2020.08.13
  • Accepted : 2021.07.27
  • Published : 2021.08.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The present study employed an analytical framework that is characterised by a synthesis of quantitative and qualitative analyses with a specially designed computer software SpeechActConc to examine speech acts in business communication. The naturally occurring data from the audio recordings and the prosodic transcriptions of the business sub-corpora of the HKCSE (prosodic) are manually annotated with a speech act taxonomy for finding out the frequency of fillers, the co-occurring patterns of fillers with other speech acts, and the linguistic realisations of fillers. The discoursal function of fillers to sustain the discourse or to hold the floor has diverse linguistic realisations, ranging from a sound (e.g. 'uhuh') and a word (e.g. 'well') to sounds (e.g. 'um er') and words, namely phrase ('sort of') and clause (e.g. 'you know'). Some are even combinations of sound(s) and word(s) (e.g. 'and um', 'yes er um', 'sort of erm'). Among the top five frequent linguistic realisations of fillers, 'er' and 'um' are the most common ones found in all the six genres with relatively higher percentages of occurrence. The remaining more frequent realisations consist of clause ('you know'), word ('yeah') and sound ('erm'). These common forms are syntactically simpler than the less frequent realisations found in the genres. The co-occurring patterns of fillers and other speech acts are diverse. The more common co-occurring speech acts with fillers include informing and answering. The findings show that fillers are not only frequently used by speakers in spontaneous conversation but also mostly represented in sounds or non-linguistic realisations.

Keywords

References

  1. Austin, J. L. (1975). How to Do Things with Words: The William James Lectures Delivered at Harvard University in 1955. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  2. Bhatia, V. K. (2017). Methodological issues in genre analysis. HERMES - Journal of Language and Communication in Business, 9(16), 39-59. https://doi.org/10.7146/hjlcb.v9i16.25383
  3. Brazil, D. (1997). The Communicative Role of Intonation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  4. Cheng, W., Greaves, C., & Warren, M. (2006). From n-gram to skipgram to concgram. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 11(4), 411-433. https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.11.4.04che
  5. Cheng, W., Greaves, C., & Warren, M. (2008). A Corpus-driven Study of Discourse Intonation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  6. Cheng, W., & Warren, M. (1999). Facilitating a description of intercultural conversations: The Hong Kong Corpus of Conversational English. ICAME Journal, 20, 5-20.
  7. Clark, H. H., & Fox Tree, J. E. (2002). Using uh and um in spontaneous speaking. Cognition, 84, 73-111. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(02)00017-3
  8. De Felice, R. (2013). A corpus-based classification of commitments in business English. In Romero-Trillo, J. (Ed.), Yearbook of Corpus Linguistics and Pragmatics 2013 (pp. 153-171). Dordrecht: Springer.
  9. De Felice, R., Darby, J., Fisher, A., & Peplow, D. (2013). A classification scheme for annotating speech acts in a business email corpus. ICAME Journal, 37, 71-105.
  10. Evans, S. (2010). Business as usual: The use of English in the professional world in Hong Kong. English for Specific Purposes, 29(3), 153-167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2009.11.005
  11. Kallen, J., & Kirk, J. (2012). SPICE-Ireland: A User's Guide. Belfast: Clo Ollscoil na Banriona.
  12. Kharismawan, P. Y. (2017). The types and the functions of the fillers used in Barack Obama's speeches. International Journal of Humanity Studies, 1(1), 111-119. https://doi.org/10.24071/ijhs.2017.010112
  13. Koester, A. (2010). Workplace Discourse. London: Continuum.
  14. Laserna, C. M., Seih, Y.-T., & Pennebaker, J. W. (2014). Um... Who like says you know: Filler word use as a function of age, gender, and personality. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 33(3), 328-338. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X14526993
  15. Schiffrin, D. (1987). Discourse Markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  16. Stenstrom, A.-B. (1994). An Introduction to Spoken Interaction. London: Longman.
  17. Stolcke, A., Ries, K., Coccaro, N., Shriberg, E., Bates, R., Jurafsky, D., Taylor, P., Martin, R., Van Ess-dykema, C., & Meteer, M. (2000). Dialogue act modeling for automatic tagging and recognition of conversational speech. Computational Linguistics, 26(3), 339-373. https://doi.org/10.1162/089120100561737
  18. Tsui, A. B. M. (1994). English Conversation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  19. Weisser, M. (2003). SPAACy - A semi-automated tool for annotating dialogue acts. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 8(1), 63-74. https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.8.1.03wei