International Journal of Computer Science & Network Security

국제컴퓨터통신보호논문지학회 (International Journal of Computer Science & Network Security)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Information Systems in Project Management of The Public Sphere

  • 투고 : 2021.08.05
  • 발행 : 2021.08.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Project management is a current trend of management in the public sphere, based on different principles, methods and tools. The tools include information technologies providing control over time, cost, quality and planning process in order to ensure accountability to interested parties. The goal of the research was to examine the impact of the integration of information systems in project management of the public sphere on the quality of public governance and administration using the example of infrastructure projects involving the private sector in developing countries. The methodology of the research is based on the concepts of "digital-era governance" (DEG), "Information governance" and "project governance" to determine the effectiveness of information systems and technologies in the management of infrastructure projects in the public sphere. The data from the countries with Lower middle income (India, Indonesia, Philippines, Ukraine, Vietnam) and Upper middle income (Argentina, Brazil, China, Colombia, Mexico, Peru, Romania, Russian Federation, Thailand, Turkey) for 1996-2020 were used to study the effects of DEG. The results show two main trends in the countries with Lower middle income and Upper middle income. The first trend is the development of digital governance, the concept of "digital-era governance" through information systems and performance measurement of the governance system, forecasting of investment flows of infrastructure projects, measurement of payback and effectiveness parameters for investment management in the public sector, decision support. The second trend is the existence of systemic challenges related to corruption, social and institutional factors through the development of democracy in developing countries and the integration of NPM similar to developed countries. The confidence of interested parties, especially private investors, in public authorities is determined by other factors - the level of return on investment, risks and assignment of responsibility, probability of successful completion of the project. These data still remain limited for a wide range of project participants, including citizens.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Amann, M., & Essig, M. (2015). Public procurement of innovation: empirical evidence from EU public authorities on barriers for the promotion of innovation. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 28(3), 282-292. https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2014.998641
  2. Bartosikova, R., Pitrova, K., & Taraba, P. (2013). Application of Project Management in Public Administration. UNIVERSITY OF DEFENCE/CZECH REPUBLIC, 15.
  3. Dunleavy, P., Margetts, H., Bastow, S., & Tinkler, J. (2006). New public management is dead-long live digital-era governance. Journal of public administration research and theory, 16(3), 467-494. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mui057
  4. ERCAS European Research Centre for Anti-Corruption and State-Building (2020). Index of Public Integrity. https://integrity-index.org/data-download/
  5. Gauld, R. (2007). Public sector information system project failures: Lessons from a New Zealand hospital organization. Government information quarterly, 24(1), 102-114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2006.02.010
  6. Hall, M., Holt, R., & Purchase, D. (2003). Project sponsors under New Public Management: lessons from the frontline. International Journal of Project Management, 21(7), 495-502. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(02)00054-6
  7. Jaafari, A., & Manivong, K. (1998). Towards a smart project management information system. International journal of project management, 16(4), 249-265. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(97)00037-9
  8. Ke, Y., Wang, S., Chan, A. P., & Lam, P. T. (2010). Preferred risk allocation in China's public-private partnership (PPP) projects. International Journal of Project Management, 28(5), 482-492. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2009.08.007
  9. Koppenjan, J., Veeneman, W., Van der Voort, H., Ten Heuvelhof, E., & Leijten, M. (2011). Competing management approaches in large engineering projects: The Dutch RandstadRail project. International Journal of Project Management, 29(6), 740-750. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2010.07.003
  10. Landow, P., & Ebdon, C. (2012). Public-private partnerships, public authorities, and democratic governance. Public Performance & Management Review, 35(4), 727-752. https://doi.org/10.2753/PMR1530-9576350408
  11. Lee, S. K., & Yu, J. H. (2012). Success model of project management information system in construction. Automation in construction, 25, 82-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2012.04.015
  12. Meyer, R., & Hammerschmid, G. (2006). Public management reform: An identity project. Public policy and administration, 21(1), 99-115. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F095207670602100107 https://doi.org/10.1177%2F095207670602100107
  13. Munns, A. K., & Bjeirmi, B. F. (1996). The role of project management in achieving project success. International journal of project management, 14(2), 81-87. https://doi.org/10.1016/0263-7863(95)00057-7
  14. Olander, S. (2007). Stakeholder impact analysis in construction project management. Construction management and economics, 25(3), 277-287. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446190600879125
  15. Rosacker, K. M., & Rosacker, R. E. (2010). Information technology project management within public sector organizations. Journal of Enterprise Information Management. 23 (5), 587-594. https://doi.org/10.1108/17410391011083047
  16. Salvia, M., Simoes, S. G., Herrando, M., Cavar, M., Cosmi, C., Pietrapertosa, F., ... & Di Leo, S. (2021). Improving policy making and strategic planning competencies of public authorities in the energy management of municipal public buildings: The PrioritEE toolbox and its application in five mediterranean areas. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 135, 110106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2020.110106
  17. Santos, V., & Varajao, J. (2015). PMO as a key ingredient of public sector projects' success-position paper. Procedia computer science, 64, 1190-1199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2015.08.546
  18. Shepherd, E., Stevenson, A., & Flinn, A. (2010). Information governance, records management, and freedom of information: A study of local government authorities in England. Government Information Quarterly, 27(4), 337-345. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2010.02.008
  19. Too, E. G., & Weaver, P. (2014). The management of project management: A conceptual framework for project governance. International Journal of Project Management, 32(8), 1382-1394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2013.07.006
  20. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs Division for Public Institutions and Digital Government (2020). E-Government Index. https://publicadministration.un.org/egovkb/en-us/data-center
  21. World Bank (2020). https://ppi.worldbank.org/en/customquery
  22. Young, R., Young, M., Jordan, E., & O'Connor, P. (2012). Is strategy being implemented through projects? Contrary evidence from a leader in New Public Management. International Journal of Project Management, 30(8), 887-900. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2012.03.003
  23. Zhang, X. S., & Cui, J. C. (1999). A project evaluation system in the state economic information system of china an operations research practice in public sectors. International Transactions in Operational Research, 6(5), 441-452. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-3995.1999.tb00166.x