DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Sub-assemblage Structure Model for Progressive Collapse Resistance Performance Analysis

연쇄붕괴 저항성능 해석을 위한 부분골조 모델

  • 나영수 (한양대 일반대학원 건축시스템공학과) ;
  • 노삼영 (한양대 건축학부 건축공학전공) ;
  • 이업 (한양대 일반대학원 건축시스템공학과)
  • Received : 2021.01.28
  • Accepted : 2021.08.23
  • Published : 2021.09.30

Abstract

For the analysis of the progressive collapse resistance performance of a structure, it is recommended to use a 3-D structure model that considers the 3-D effect of the slab, the continuity of the adjacent spans, and the redistribution of stress through the alternated path of the upper stories. Although a structure is modeled with reduced modeling concepts, the large size of the target structure still requires a lot of time on modeling and analysis. In this study, the sub-assemblage structure modeling concept was presented. The area of the sub-assemblage structure was determined by the analysis of the number of affected spans using the stress variation in the members before and after the sudden column removal in the entire structure model. The modeling concept was suggested in three levels according to the degree of the modelled detail of members located in the outer area of the sub-assemblage structure. They are evaluated by comparing the load-displacement relationship, girder stresses and plastic hinging locations with those resulted by the simulation of entire structure model.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

이 성과는 2019년도 정부(과학기술정보통신부)의 재원으로 한국연구재단의 지원을 받아 수행된 연구임(No.2019R1F1A1057355)

References

  1. ABAQUS/Standard(2018). ABAQUS ver. 6.20 [Computer Software], Dassault Systems.
  2. AISC 341 (2016). Seismic Provisions for Structural Steel Buildings, American Institute of Steel Construction, Chicago, IL.
  3. Alashker, Y., El-Tawi, S., & Sadek F. (2010). Progressive Collapse Resistance of Steel-Concrete Composite Floors, Journal of Structural Engineering, 136(10), 1187-1196. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000230
  4. BSI (2001). Structural Use of Steelwork in Buildings - Part 1: Code of Practice for Design-rolled and Welded Sections, BS 5950, London: BSI.
  5. DoD (2005). Unified Facilities Criteria; DoD Design of Buildings to Resist Progressive Collapse, UFC 4-023-03, U.S. Army Corps of Engineering.
  6. GSA (2003). Progressive Collapse Analysis and Design Guidelines for New Federal Office Buildings and Major Modernization Projects, Office of Chief Architect.
  7. Gupta, A., & Krawinkler, H. (1999). Seismic Demands for Performance Evaluation of Steel Moment Resisting Frame Structures (SAC Task 5.4.3), John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Research Center Rep. No. 132, Dept. Civil and Environ. Engrg, Stanford University.
  8. Izzuddin, B.A., Vlassis, A.G., Elghazouli, A.Y., & Nethercot, D.A. (2008). Progressive Collapse of Multi-Storey Buildings due to Sudden Column Loss-Part I: Simplified assessment framework, Engineering Structures, 30(5), 1308-1318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2007.07.011
  9. KBC (2016). Korea Building Code-Chapter 7: Design Loads; Korea Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport, Sejong, Korea.
  10. Kiakojouri, F., & Sheidaii, M.R. (2018). Effects of finite element modeling and analysis techniques on response of steel moment-resisting frame in dynamic column removal scenarios, Asian Journal of Civil Engineering, 19, 295-307 https://doi.org/10.1007/s42107-018-0027-2
  11. Kim, J.K., Kim, T.W., & You, J.S. (2007c). Nonlinear Dynamic Evaluation of Progressive Collapse-Resisting Performance of Steel Moment Frames Considering Panel Zone Deformation, Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea Structure & Construction, 23(11), 51-58.
  12. Kim, S. (2014). Analytical Study on Effect of Floor Slab for Progressive Collapse Resistant Capacity of Steel Moment Frames, Journal of the Computational Structural Engineering, 27(1), 27-35.
  13. KSSDC (2016). Korea Steel Structure Design Code: Load and Resistance Factored Design, Korea Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport, Sejong, Korea.
  14. Lee, C.H. (2002). Lateral Stiffness of Steel Moment Frames Having Dogbone Seismic Connection, Journal of the Computational Structural Engineering Institute of Korea, 15(4), 639-648.
  15. Lee, C.H., & Kim, S.W. (2007). Simplified Nonlinear Static Progressive Collapse Analysis of Steel Moment Frames, Journal of KSSC, 19(4), 383-393
  16. Lee, S.Y., Noh, S.Y., & Lee, D.K. (2018). Evaluation of Progressive Collapse Resistance of Steel Moment Frames Designed with Different Connection Details Using Energy -Based Approximate Analysis, Sustainability, 10(10), 3797. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10103797
  17. Li, L.L., Li, G.Q., Jiang, B., & Lu, Y. (2018). Analysis or Robustness of Steel Frames against Progressive Collapse, Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 143, 264-278 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2018.01.010
  18. Main, J.A. (2014). Composite Floor Systems under Column Loss: Collapse Resistance and Tie Force Requirements, Journal of Structural Engineering, 140(8), A4014003. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000952
  19. Main, J.A., & Sadek, F. (2012). Robustness of Steel Gravity Frame Systems with Single Plate Shear Connections, NIST Technical Note 1749, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD.
  20. Sadek, F., Main, J.A., Lew, H.S., Robert, S.D., Chiarito, V.P., & El-Tawil, S. (2010). An Experimental and Computational Study of Steel Moment Connections under a Column Removal Scenario, NIST Technical Note 1669, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD.