International Journal of Computer Science & Network Security

국제컴퓨터통신보호논문지학회 (International Journal of Computer Science & Network Security)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

THE ACTIVITIES OF AMALGAMATED TERRITORIAL COMMUNITIES IN THE CONTEXT OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT: THE EXPERIENCE OF UKRAINE AND THE EU STATES

  • 투고 : 2021.09.05
  • 발행 : 2021.09.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

The relevance of the study implies the need to explain the main determinants of environmental policy, allowing countries to converge on a common working basis. The purpose of the research is to explore ways in which the environmental aspects of EU regions and territories can be shaped to apply to domestic environmental policy. A total of 997 representatives from the Ukrainian UTCs, who are involved in local environmental policy, participated in the survey. Results of the research. A hierarchy of regional environmental policy objectives has been identified. Three key principles of eco-policy development have been distinguished. The means of the innovative approach strategy implementation have been outlined (formation of the regional market of environmental services; organization of interaction between environmental agencies and market structures; establishment of environmental funds which finance environmental activities; implementation of the "collateral return" system; formation of a system of benefits and loans to enterprises that successfully implement the environmental policy). The means of the prognostic approach implementation strategy to the development of the region's environmental policy have been determined (the use of an orderly and successful long-term strategy of economic development of the region; obligatory consideration in the mechanisms strategy aimed at improvement of environmental management system of the region, interbranch impact of the projects implemented on the region's ecological situation; taking into consideration the economic and geographical peculiarities of the region, the necessary infrastructure, issues of the territorial location of the large enterprises in the region and their impact on the environment). The means of the traditional approach strategy implementation have been outlined (activity programs focused on solution of specific problems, rather than on the implementation of measures for environmental restoration and enhancement; nature conservation problems have interbranch, interdepartmental character due to unity of the region's ecosystem; tracking complexity of changing conditions (water basins, woodlands, air-mass transport), regional boundaries generally do not coincide with natural ecosystems boundaries). The practical significance of the study lies in providing recommendations for the implementation of certain aspects of Ukrainian UTC's environmental policy.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Aliyev, I., & Gojayev, M. (2021). Azerbaijan model of environmental policy. Far eastern spring - 2021, 41-44. https://doi.org/10.17084/978-5-7765-1472-2_2021_41
  2. Anthony, B. et al. (2019). Principles of environmental policy: local, european and global perspectives. GRASS - EU governance of natural resources: geopolitics, regions and sectors. SMART - Systems for monitoring and responses to early warnings - EU experience for Russia, 5, 17-23. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/331998262_Principles_of_Environmental_Policy_Local_European_and_Global_Perspectives
  3. Arbolino, R., Carlucci, F., de Simone, L., Ioppolo, G., & Yigitcanlar, T. (2018). The policy diffusion of environmental performance in the European countries. Ecological Indicators, 89, 130-138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.01.062
  4. Biedenkopf, K., & Groen, L. (2021). External EU environmental policy. Environmental Policy in the EU, 1, 35-50. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429402333-4
  5. Bodiguel, M., & Buller, H. (2020). Environmental policy and the regions in France. The End of the French Unitary State, 1, 92-102. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315037585-7
  6. Boyko, O. (2021). Status of territorial communities in Ukraine. Law and public administration, 1, 16-20. https://doi.org/10.32840/pdu.2021.1.2
  7. Christensen, T., Cossu, R., & Stegmann, R.. (2020). Environmental Aspects. Landfilling of Waste: Biogas, 1, 85-233. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003062097-3
  8. Cousins, P., & Schmitz, E. (2020). Territory, community and the efficacy of the state. Protecting Human Rights Defenders at Risk, 1, 130-157. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429402111-6
  9. D'Adamo, I., Gastaldi, M., & Rosa, P. (2021). Assessing environmental and energetic indexes in 27 European countries. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 11, 417-423. https://doi.org/10.32479/ijeep.11169
  10. De Stefano, L., de Pedraza, J., & Villarroya, F. (2020). A methodology for the evaluation of water policies in European Countries. Environmental management, 45, 1363-77. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-010-9492-4
  11. Dinic, J., Bukovala, J., & Ivannikov, N. (2021). Ecological Policy of the European Union. Ecological Policy, 28, 16-21. https://doi.org/10.18485/ecologica.2021.28.101.4
  12. Dushkova, D., & Kirillov, S. (2017). Ecological consciousness as one of the main principles of ecological policy. Bulletin of Volgograd State University. Series 3. Economics. Ecology, 19, 148-158. https://doi.org/10.15688/jvolsu3.2017.2.15
  13. Faifura, V., & Krainskyi, I. (2018). Environmental and energy modernization of united territorial communities development. Regional aspects of the development of productive forces in Ukraine, 27, 16-19. https://doi.org/10.35774/rarrpsu2018.23.016
  14. G'aybullaev, O. (2017). Some aspects and historical factors of integration processes in sphere of globalization of the ecological policy. Theoretical & Applied Science, 48, 83-86. https://doi.org/10.15863/TAS.2017.04.48.14
  15. Greene, J. (2021). Recycling and Environmental Aspects. Automotive Plastics and Composites, 1, 279-300. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-818008-2.00014-3
  16. Jordan, A., Gravey, V., & Adelle, C. (2021). EU environmental policy. Contexts, actors and policy dynamics, 1, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429402333-1
  17. Kerner, P., Klarl, T., & Wendler, T. (2021). Green Technologies, Environmental Policy and Regional Growth. Bremen Papers on Economics & Innovation, 2104, 3-47. https://doi.org/10.26092/elib/803
  18. Kijek, T., Kijek, A., Bolibok, P., & Matras-Bolibok, A. (2021). The patterns of energy innovation convergence across European countries. Energies, 14, 2755. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14102755
  19. Knyazev, Y. (2021). The features of Slovenia ecological policy. Social'naja politika i social'noe partnerstvo (Social Policy and Social Partnership), 264 (317)-272 (324). https://doi.org/10.33920/pol-01-2104-01
  20. Korkuna, O., & Korkuna, I., & Kulyk, O. (2020). Green tourism as a factor of development of united territorial communities in Ukraine. Economic and Regional Studies / Studia Ekonomiczne i Regionalne, 13, 126-136. https://doi.org/10.2478/ers-2020-0009
  21. Mulder, E.F.J., Van Ree, C., & Hack, H. (2015). Geo-environmental Aspects of European Underground Infrastructure. Environmental Security of the European Cross-Border Energy Supply Infrastructure, NATO Science for Peace and Security Series C: Environmental Security, 1, 133-153. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9538-8_9
  22. Prisac, I. (2017). Ecological policies and their challenges for the economy of Eastern Europe. Business ethics and leadership from an Eastern European, Transdisciplinary Context, 1, 147-157. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45186-2_14
  23. Rudomakha, A. (2019). Geoinformation analysis of land use of the united territorial communities. Scientific notes of Taurida National V.I. Vernadsky University. Series: Technical Sciences, 5, 181-185. https://doi.org/10.32838/2663-5941/2019.5-2/32
  24. Skrinjaric, T. (2021). Ranking environmental aspects of sustainable tourism: case of selected European Countries. Sustainability, 1, 13. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13105701
  25. Smiljkovic, M. (2017). The europeanization of national environmental policies. Yearbook of the Faculty of Security, 2017, 313-330. https://doi.org/10.5937/GFB1701313S
  26. Speight, J. (2020). Environmental aspects. Shale Oil and Gas Production Processes, 1, 943-1001. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-813315-6.00018-X
  27. Vanassche, S., Vranken, L., & Vercaemst, P. (2009). The impact of environmental policy on industrial sectors. Empirical evidence from 14 European Countries, 1, 5-8. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/254420688_The_impact_of_environmental_policy_on_industrial_sectors_empirical_evidence_from_14_European_Countries
  28. Vysochyna, A., Samusevych, Y., & Starchenko, L. (2020). Convergence trends of environmental taxation in European countries. E3S Web of Conferences, 202, 03031. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202020203031
  29. Zechendorf, B. (2014). Biotechnology policy in European countries. An assessment. Journal of Commercial Biotechnology, 10, 340-351. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jcb.3040092