DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Shaking Table Test for Analysis of Effect on Vibration Control of the Piping System by Steel Coil Damper

강재 코일 댐퍼의 배관시스템 진동제어 효과 분석을 위한 진동대시험

  • Received : 2021.11.05
  • Accepted : 2021.12.08
  • Published : 2022.01.01

Abstract

Many piping systems installed in the power plant are directly related to the safety and operation of the plant. Various dampers have been applied to the piping system to reduce the damage caused by earthquakes. In order to reduce the vibration of the piping system, this study developed a steel coil damper (SCD) with a straightforward structure but excellent damping performance. SCD reduces the vibration of the objective structure by hysteretic damping. The new SCD damper can be applied to high-temperature environments since it consists of steel members. The paper introduces a design method for the elastoplastic coil spring, which is the critical element of SCD. The practical applicability of the design procedure was validated by comparing the nonlinear force-displacement curves calculated by design equations with the results obtained from nonlinear finite element analysis and repeated loading test. It was found that the designed SCD's have a damping ratio higher than 25%. In addition, this study performed a set of seismic tests using a shaking table with an existing piping system to verify the vibration control capacity on the piping system by SCD. Test results prove that the SCD can effectively control the displacement vibration of the piping system up to 80%.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

본 연구는 2018년도 산업통상자원부의 재원으로 한국에너지기술평가원(KETEP)의 원자력핵심기술개발사업의 지원(No. 20181520102780)을 받아 수행한 연구과제입니다.

References

  1. "When the largest thermal power plant stopped due to an earthquake, the remaining three power plants stopped one after another", The Chosunilbo World. 2018 Sep 7 [Revised, 2018 Sep 12]. Available from: https://www.chosun.com/site/data/html_dir/2018/09/07/2018090700298.html.
  2. Kunieda M, Chiba T, Kobayashi H. Positive use of damping devices for piping systems-some experiences and new proposals. J Nuclear Engineering Design. 1987;104(2):107-120. https://doi.org/10.1016/0029-5493(87)90292-5
  3. Olson DE, Tang YK. Decreasing snubber in-service inspection costs through snubber reduction and improved test limits. J Nuclear Engineering Design. 1988;107(1-2):183-199. https://doi.org/10.1016/0029-5493(88)90321-4
  4. Parulekar YM, Reddy GR, Vaze KK, Kushwaha HS. Elasto-plastic damper for passive control of seismic response of piping systems. BARC Internal Report. Reactor Safety Division. c2002.
  5. Chang S, Sun W, Cho SG, Kim D. Vibration Control of Nuclear Power Plant Piping System Using Stockbridge Damper under Earthquakes. Science and Technology of Nuclear Installations. 2016;201: Article ID 5014093.
  6. Techniques of the Snubber Testing in a Nuclear Power Plant. Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute. KAERI/AR-395/94. 1994,
  7. Cho YB, Moon GY, Yoo HJ. Status of Inspection and Management for Nuclear Power Plants Snubbers. J KPVP. 2014;10(1):20-24.
  8. Cho SG, Furuya O, Kurabayashi H. Study on s evere accident management measures for the pinping system in nuclear power plant using vibration control techniques. 24th Conference on Structural Mechanics in Reactor Technology; 2017 August 20-25; BEXCO, Busan, Korea; c2017.
  9. Cho SG, Furuya O, Kurabayashi H. Enhancement of Seismic Resilience of Piping Systems in Nuclear Power Plants Using Steel Coil Damper. J Nuclear Engineering and Design. 2019;350:147-157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2019.05.006
  10. Cho SG, Furuya O, Kurabayashi H. Vibration Control of Piping System in Nuclear Power Plant Using Elasto-plastic Steel Coil Spring Damper under Earthquake. Transactions of the Korean Nuclear Society Spring Meeting; 2019 May 23-24; Jeju, Korea; c2019.
  11. Design Guidelines of a Spring-Damper System for Emergency Diesel Generator Sets. KAERI/TR-3363 /2007. Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute. c2007.
  12. Nakamura I, Otani A, Shiratori M. A Study on Fracture Mechanics of Eroded Pipes under Seismic Loading. National Research Institute for Earth Science and Disaster Prevention, Japan. c2007. p. 306.
  13. ANSYS Inc. ANSYS Workbench, Version 2019 R3; c2009.
  14. IEEE Recommended Practice for Seismic Qualification of Class 1E Equipment for Nuclear Power Generating Stations. IEEE Std 344: IEEE; c2004.