Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea (대한건축학회논문집)

Architectural Institute of Korea (대한건축학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Proposed Method to Improve the Physical Protection System of an Architectural Facility Factoring Indoor Accessibility

이동편의성을 고려한 건축시설의 물리적방호 체계 강화방법 제안

  • 신재섭 (서울대 대학원, 한국전력기술) ;
  • 최재필 (서울대 건축학과)
  • Received : 2021.10.15
  • Accepted : 2021.12.26
  • Published : 2022.01.30
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study proposes a method to derive an optimal alternative to the reinforcement point factoring indoor accessibility by evaluating the physical protection system for architectural facilities with many internal users among nationally significant facilities. The point of high accessibility is when an area is frequently used by insiders; consequently, when security is strengthened, indoor accessibility is lowered. Therefore, a point with a high effect of reinforcement physical protection system was derived while minimizing the deterioration of the indoor accessibility of internal users. To verify, a BIM model based pilot facility was selected, and vulnerability analysis was performed factoring all access routes using a spatial network. For the reinforcement method, improving the performance of the protection point and adding a protection point was considered. As a result of this simulation, 45 intrusion routes, 45 routes of physical protection effectiveness values, and 33 reinforcement alternative points were derived. A total of 72,428 reinforcement cases were analyzed, and 11 optimal alternatives were gleaned. In conclusion, this study was conducted to find alternatives for places that should be strengthened at low cost for facilities needing a physical protection system. The effectiveness of this proposed method was confirmed through a simulation and is possible to potentially use as a quantitative design criteria, evaluation, or reinforcement of a physical protection system for nationally significant facilities.

Keywords

References

  1. Andiwijayakusuma, D., Mardhi, A., Savitri, I., & Asmoro, T. (2019). A Comparative Study of the Algorithms for Path finding to Determine the Adversary Path in Physical Protection System of Nuclear Facilities, Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1198(9)
  2. Bennet, H.A. (1977). The EASI approach to physical security evaluation, SAND Report 76-0500
  3. Biringer, B., Matalucci, R., & O'Connor, S. (2007). Security Risk Assessment and Management, Wiley & Sons, Inc.
  4. Biringer, B., Vugrin, E., & Warren, D. (2013). Critical Infrastructure System Security and Resiliency, CRC Press
  5. Brandes, U. (2001). A Faster Algorithm for Betweenness Centrality, Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 25(2), 163-177 https://doi.org/10.1080/0022250X.2001.9990249
  6. Cakija, D., Ban, Z., Golub, M., & Cakija, D. (2019). Optimizing physical protection system using domain experienced exploration method, AUTOMATIKA, 61(2), 207-218 https://doi.org/10.1080/00051144.2019.1698192
  7. Dan, T., Xi, Y., Ni, F., & Cao, G. (2002). Physical Protection System and Vulnerability Analysis Program in China
  8. Fu, M., Liu, R., Qi, B., & Issa, R. (2020). Generating straight skeleton-based navigation networks with Industry Foundation Classes for indoor way-finding, Automation in Construction, 112
  9. Garcia, M. L. (2008). The Design and Evaluation of Physical Protection Systems, Elsevier
  10. Jang, S., Kwan, S., Yoo, H., & Kim, S. (2009). Development of a Vulnerability Assessment Code for a Physical Protection System Systematic Analysis of Physical Protection Effectiveness (SAPE), Nuclear Engineering and Technology, 41(5), 747-752 https://doi.org/10.5516/NET.2009.41.5.747
  11. Jeon, Y., & Kim, Y. (2019). A Study on Improvement of the School Space through Socio-Spatial Network Analysis, Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea, 35(5), 21-30
  12. Kim, M., & Kim, Y. (2014). Changes in the Urban Spatial Structure of Busan Area due to the Completion of Buk-Hang Bridge, Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea, 30(5), 203-210
  13. Porter, S., Tan, S., Tan, T., & West, G. (2014). Breaking into BIM: Performing static and dynamic security analysis with the aid of BIM, Automation in Construction, 40, pp.84-95 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2013.12.002
  14. Santosa, S. (2009). Indoor centrality, Masters Coursework thesis, School of Engineering, Department of Geomatics, The University of Melbourne.
  15. Sedgewick, R. (2001). Algorithms in C, Part 5: Graph Algorithms, Addison Wesley Professional, 3rd ed.
  16. Setiawan, Y.(2018). Adversary path analysis of a physical protection system design using a stochastic approach, Masters Coursework thesis, Texas A&M University
  17. Seo, J., Jang, S., & Yoo, H. (2016). Analysis on Physical Protection Vulnerability Assessment Programs Using Different Modeling Methods, Journal of the Korean Society Hazard Mitigation, 16(5), 221-230 https://doi.org/10.9798/KOSHAM.2016.16.5.221
  18. Shin, D., Cho, T., & Jeon, Y. (2019). A Study on the Direction of User Participatory Design for School using Socio-Spatial Network Analysis, Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea, 35(10), 19-30
  19. Shin, J., & Choi, J. (2021). Development of Quantitative Evaluation System for PPS(Physical Protection System) using BIM-based 3D Network, Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea, 37(6), 65-74 https://doi.org/10.5659/JAIK.2021.37.6.65
  20. Taneja, S., Akinci, B., Garrett Jr., J.H., & Solibelman, L. (2016). Algorithms for automated generation of navigation models from building information models to support indoor map-matching, Automation in Construction, 61
  21. Yoon, C., & Min, G. (2014). A Study on the Development Pedestrian Flow Prediction Model Considering the Metric Distance of Network Structure, Urban Design Institute of Korea, 15(5), 173-182
  22. Zou, B., Wang, W., Liu, J., Yan, Z., Liu, G., Wang, J., & Wei, G. (2020). Development of a structure analytic hierarchy approach for the evaluation of the physical protection system effectiveness, Nuclear Engineering and Technology, 52(8), 1661-1668 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2020.01.033