대한건축학회논문집 (Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea)

  • 제38권1호
  • /
  • Pages.109-120
  • /
  • 2022
  • /
  • 2733-6239(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2733-6247(eISSN)
대한건축학회 (Architectural Institute of Korea)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

헤르조그와 드 뫼롱 건축의 복합적 지각에 관한 연구 - 미니멀 아트와 팝 아트의 영향을 중심으로 -

A Study on the Complex Perception of Architecture by Herzog and de Meuron - The Influence of Minimal Art and Pop Art -

  • 투고 : 2021.11.02
  • 심사 : 2022.01.14
  • 발행 : 2022.01.30
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Herzog and de Meuron discussed the ways that fine art influenced their architecture; they both acknowledged generic boundaries while emphasizing their interest in anti-formalism and superficial images. They also compared their work to the Minimal Art and Pop Art movements that prevailed in the 1960s. In Minimal Art, artists worked with materiality and phenomenological perception. Additionally, Joseph Beuys's influence on Herzog and de Meuron is apparent in the way they treated materials as a process of accommodating natural changes over time. One can also rightly compare the facades of Herzog and de Meuron's buildings to Pop Art screens. In Pop Art, the screen acts as a floating sign by repeating an image that has no referential depth. According to Hal Foster, one observes the Pop collapse of the phenomenological into the imaginary in Herzog and de Meuron's architecture. Notably, the characteristics of individual art movements appear in a complex way in their architecture. This study explores three ways in which one can observe Minimal and Pop dialectics. Regarding their architectural approach, it ensures that a material's surface reflects an image by disturbing one's perception of its physical properties of hiding or distorting the materials' weight or structural properties, rendering a screen-like image. By juxtaposing material substances and the pop image, their architecture encourages an ambivalent perception between materiality and immateriality. Lastly, the minimal forms they employ create its own kind of flat wide screen, upon which they place repeated patterns. Such characteristics are the result of Herzog and de Meuron's strategy to reinterpret conventional materiality and juxtapose objects and images. These results were based on the specificity of the architectural conditions. As one moves away from an object, one's perception of the building shifts from interpreting the object as an image to a physical object. In describing this phenomenon, Foster used a negative nuanced phrase: "the pop collapse of the phenomenological." However, when recast into architectural conditions, one can interpret the same phenomenon as "a pop transformation of the phenomenological thing" or as "a phenomenological transformation of the pop."

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Baker, K. (1993). Minimalism, Kim, S. trans. Yeolhwadang, 10.
  2. Barthes, R. (1989). "That Old Thing, Art" in Post-Pop, Taylor, P. ed., MIT Press: Cambridge.
  3. Canonica, F., & Herzog. J. (2015). Ohne Mauer gabe es keine menschliche Zivilisation. Ein Gesprach mit dem Architekten Jacques Herzog, Das Magazin, 17, Zurich, Tamedia, 12-23.
  4. Foster, H. (2003). In Return of the Real, (Lee, Y., Cho, J. & Choi, Y. Trans.), Kyongsung University Press. 81-130, 203-219.
  5. Foster, H. (2014). The Art-Architecture Complex, (Kim, J. Trans.), Hyunmun Publishing Co. 173-207.
  6. Foster, H., Krauss, R., Bois, Y., Buchloh, B. H. D., & Joselit, D. (2004). Art Since 1900, S. Bae, J. Shin, & Y. Oh Trans., Semicolon Press, 538.
  7. Forster K. W. (2002). Pieces for Four and More Hands, in Herzog & de Meuron : Natural History, Philip Ursprung ed. Lars Muller Publisher, 54.
  8. Fried, M. (1967). Art and Objecthood, The University of Chicago Press.
  9. Herzog, J. (1996). Herzog & de Meuron - Eine Ausstellung in Remy Zaugg, Kunsthaus Bregenz, Ostfildern, Cantz, 30. (Ursprung, 2002, recite)
  10. Herzog, J. (1988). "The Hidden Geometry of Nature" in Herzog & de Meuron, Wang, W. (1992), Artemis, 144.
  11. Herzog, J., Adam, H., & Burkle J. C. (2011). "From Art to World-Class Architecture", in Architecture Dialogues. Positions, Concepts, Visions. Angelil, M. & Himmelreich, J eds., Sulgen, Niggli AG, 62-85.
  12. Herzog, J., & de Meuron, P. (1996a). 094 Ricola-Europe SA, Production and Storage Building Mulhouse-Brunstatt. Retrieved October 09, 2021 from https://www.herzogdeme uron.com/index/projects/complete-works/076-100/094-ricola-europe-production-and-storage-building.html
  13. Herzog, J., & de Meuron, P. (1996b). 047 Architektur Denkform Architekturmuseum, Retrieved September 22, 2021 from https://www.herzogdemeuron.com/index/project.c omplete-works/026-050/047-architektur-denkform-basel.html
  14. Herzog, J., & Kipnis, J. (1997). A Conversation with Jacques Herzog, F. M. & Richard C. Levene, R. C Eds., 84, Madrid, El Croquis, 7-21.
  15. Herzog, J., & de Meuron, P. (2000). Jeffrey Kopie Ed., Collaborations with Artists, Museum Projects, and our first Building in America, Chinati Foundation, 31-58. (Lecture held by Jacques Herzog at the Symposium Art and Architecture hosted by The Chinati Foundation, Marfa, Texas, 25 - 26 April 1998.)
  16. Herzog, J., & de Meuron, P. (2002). "Just Waste" in Herzog & de Meuron : Natural History, Philip Ursprung ed. Lars Muller Publisher, 75.
  17. Jenner, R. (2017). Production of site and site of production: Herzog & de Meuron's Schaulager and Zumthor's Feldkapelle, Architectural Research Quaterly, 20(4), 313-323. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1359135517000033
  18. Judd. D. (1965). Specific Objects, Arts Yearbook, No.8, 1965, 82.
  19. Kudielka, R. (2002). "Speculative Architecture" in Herzog & de Meuron : Natural History, Philip Ursprung ed. Lars Muller Publisher, 285.
  20. Kim, H., & Kim, J. (2008). A Study on the Tentonic Expressional Characteristics of Context in Contemporary Architecture: Focused on the Critical Regionalism, Proceeding of Annual Conference of the Architectural Institute of Korea, 29(1), October, 469.
  21. Lee, H., & Lyu, H. (2016). Study on the Expression of Material Properties in terms of Minimalism with Analyzing Works ny Herzog & de Meuron and Peter Zumthor, Journal of Basic Design & Art, 17(4), 369-381.
  22. Mack, G. (2000). Herzog & de Meuron 1992-1996, Birkhauser, 8-9.
  23. Manolopoulou, Y. (2009). Repetition to monochrome: surfaces for picture making by Herzog & de Meuron and Ellsworth Kelly, The Journal of Architecture, 14(3). 407-420 https://doi.org/10.1080/13602360903028036
  24. Moneo, R. (2008). Theoretical Anxiety and Design Strategies in the Work of Eight Contemporary Architects, The MIT Press, 2004. (Lee, Y. Trans.), Space Publisher, 444-445.
  25. Moon, J. (2012). A Study in the Media Message of Jacques Herzog & Pierre de Meuron's Architecture Skin: Focused on the Media Theory of Marshall Mcluhan, Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea Planning & Design, 28(8), 131-138. https://doi.org/10.5659/JAIK_PD.2012.28.8.131
  26. Park, H., & Jo, S. (2010). A Critical Study on the 'Material Image' Represented in the Contemporary Architecture based on Fredric Jameson's Dialectical Theory, Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea Planning & Design, 12(2), 53-62.
  27. Park, M. (2017). Place-Forming of Minimal Object Through Expanded Presentness, Ph. D. Dissertation, Seoul National University. 118-127, 194-204.
  28. Quesada-Garcia, S. (2018). Herzog & de Meuron o la (renovada) mimesis de la naturaleza, Revista de Arquitectura, 20.
  29. Raskin, D. (2006). The Shiny Illusionism of Krauss and Judd, 2006, Art Journal, 65(1), Spring, 7. https://doi.org/10.1080/00043249.2006.10791192
  30. Resier+Umemoto. (2006). Atlas of Novel Tectonics, Princeton Architectural Press: New York, 47, 50-51, 102.
  31. Riley, T. (1995). Architecture of Herzog & de Meuron, Peter Blum Edition : New York.
  32. Ursprung, P. (2002). Herzog & de Meuron : Natural History, Philip Ursprung ed. Lars Muller Publisher, 2002.
  33. Venturi, R., Izenour. S. & Brown, D. S. (1977). Learning from Las Vegas, The MIT Press; revised edition.