DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A two-step interval risk assessment method for water inrush during seaside tunnel excavation

  • Zhou, Binghua (Geotechnical and Structural Engineering Research Center, Shandong University) ;
  • Xue, Yiguo (Geotechnical and Structural Engineering Research Center, Shandong University) ;
  • Li, Zhiqiang (Geotechnical and Structural Engineering Research Center, Shandong University) ;
  • Gao, Haidong (China Railway 18th Bureau Group Co. Ltd.) ;
  • Su, Maoxin (Geotechnical and Structural Engineering Research Center, Shandong University) ;
  • Qiu, Daohong (Geotechnical and Structural Engineering Research Center, Shandong University) ;
  • Kong, Fanmeng (Geotechnical and Structural Engineering Research Center, Shandong University)
  • Received : 2020.05.19
  • Accepted : 2022.02.04
  • Published : 2022.03.25

Abstract

Water inrush may occur during seaside urban tunnel excavation. Various factors affect the water inrush, and the water inrush mechanism is complex. In this study, nine evaluation indices having potential effects on water inrush were analysed. Specifically, the geographic and geomorphic conditions, unfavourable geology, distance from the tunnel to sea, strength of the surrounding rock, groundwater level, tidal action, cyclical footage, grouting pressure, and grouting reinforced region were analysed. Furthermore, a two-step interval risk assessment method for water inrush management during seaside urban tunnel excavation was developed by a multi-index system and interval risk assessment comprised of an interval analytic hierarchy process, fuzzy comprehensive evaluation, and relative superiority analysis. The novel assessment method was applied to the Haicang Tunnel successfully. A preliminary interval risk assessment method for water inrush was performed based on engineering geological conditions. As a result, the risk level fell into a risk level IV, which represents a section with high risk. Subsequently, a secondary interval risk assessment method was performed based on engineering geological conditions and construction conditions. The risk level of water inrush is reduced to a risk level II. The results agreed with the current tunnel situation, which verified the reliability of this approach.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Much of the work presented in this paper was supported by the National Natural Science Foundations of China (grant numbers 41877239, 51379112, 51422904 and 41772298), Key Technology Research and Development Program of Shandong Province (grant number 2019GSF111028) and the Fundamental Research Funds of Shandong University (2018JC044). The authors would like to express appreciation to the reviewers for their valuable comments and suggestions that helped improve the quality of our paper.

References

  1. Aalianvari, A. (2017), "Combination of engineering geological data and numerical modeling results to classify the tunnel route based on the groundwater seepage", Geomech. Eng., 13(4), 671-683. https://doi.org/10.12989/gae.2017.13.4.671.
  2. Cardenas, I., Al-Jibouri, S.S.H, Halman, J.I.M., van de Linde, W. and Kaalberg, F. (2014), "Using prior risk-related knowledge to support risk management decisions: lessons learnt from a tunneling project", Risk Anal., 34(10), 1923-1943. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.12213.
  3. Chen, J.F., Hsieh, H.N. and Do, Q.H. (2015), "Evaluating teaching performance based on fuzzy AHP and comprehensive evaluation approach", Appl. Soft. Comput., 28, 100-108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2014.11.050.
  4. Chen, Z., Chen, L., Yang, Q., Bai, X. and Zhao, F. (2014), "Interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy set method for group multi-attribute decision-making with unknown attribute weights", Control Theory Appl., 31(8), https://doi.org/1025-1033.10.7641/CTA.2014.31281.
  5. Dammyr, O., Nilsen, B. and Gollegger, J. (2017), "Feasibility of tunnel boring through weakness zones in deep Norwegian subsea tunnels", Tunn. Undergr. Sp. Technol., 69, 133-146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2017.06.012.
  6. Fahimifar, A. and Zareifard, M.R. (2014), "A new elasto-plastic solution for analysis of underwater tunnels considering strain-dependent permeability", Struct. Infrastruct. E., 10(11), 1432-1450. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2013.824489.
  7. Feng, S. and Xu, L.D. (1999), "Decision support for fuzzy comprehensive evaluation of urban development", Fuzzy Set. Syst., 105(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0114(97)00229-7.
  8. Garg, H. and Kumar, K. (2020), "A novel possibility measure to interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy set using connection number of set pair analysis and its applications", Neural Comput. Appl., 32, 3337-3348. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-019-04291-w.
  9. Gao, Y.; Li, D. and Zhong, H. (2020), "A novel target threat assessment method based on three-way decisions under intuitionistic fuzzy multi-attribute decision making environment", Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell., 87, https://doi.org/103276.10.1016/j.engappai.2019.103276.
  10. Hong, E.S., Park, E.S., Shin, H.S. and Kim, H.M. (2010), "Effect of a front high hydraulic conductivity zone on hydrological behavior of subsea tunnels", KSCE J. Civ. Eng., 14(5), 699-707. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-010-0838-5.
  11. Huang, G., Xiao, L. and Zhang, G. (2020), "Improved failure mode and effect analysis with interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy rough number theory", Appl. Artif. Intell., 95, 103856. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2020.103856.
  12. Kang, Y., Liu, Q., Cheng, Y. and Liu, X. (2016), "Combined freeze-sealing and New Tubular Roof construction methods for seaside urban tunnel in soft ground", Tunn. Undergr. Sp. Technol., 58, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2016.04.001.
  13. Kasper, T., Steenfelt, J.S., Pedersen, L.M., Jackson, P.G. and Heijmans, R.W.M.G. (2008), "Stability of an immersed tunnel in offshore conditions under deep water wave impact", Coast. Eng., 55(9), 753-760. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coastaleng.2008.02.021.
  14. Lee, I.M. and Nam, S.W. (2004), "Effect of tunnel advance rate on seepage forces acting on the underwater tunnel face", Tunn. Undergr. Sp. Technol., 19(3), 273-281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2003.11.005.
  15. Lee, J.H., Seo, S.I. and Mun, H.S. (2016), "Seismic behaviors of a floating submerged tunnel with a rectangular cross-section", Ocean Eng., ,127, 32-47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2016.09.033.
  16. Li, S., Zhang Z., Mei, G., Lin, D., Yu, J., Qiu, R., Su, X., Lin X. and Lou, C. (2021), "Utilization of BIM in the construction of a submarine tunnel: a case study in Xiamen city, China", J. Civ. Eng. Manag., 27(1), 14-26. https://doi.org/10.3846/jcem.2021.14098.
  17. Li, S., Zhou, Z., Li, L., Lin, P., Xu, Z. and Shi, S. (2016), "A new quantitative method for risk assessment of geological disasters in underground engineering Attribute Interval Evaluation Theory (AIET)", Tunn. Undergr. Sp. Technol., 53, 128-139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2015.12.014.
  18. Ma, D., Rezania, M., Yu, H. and Bai, H. (2017), "Variations of hydraulic properties of granular sandstones during water inrush: Effect of small particle migration", Eng. Geol., 217, 61-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2016.12.006.
  19. Mathew, M., Chakrabortty, R and Ryan, M. (2020), "A novel approach integrating AHP and TOPSIS under spherical fuzzy sets for advanced manufacturing system selection", Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell., 96, 103988. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2020.103988.
  20. Mazek, S.A. (2014), "Evaluation of surface displacement equation due to tunnelling in cohesionless soil", Geomech. Eng., 7(1), 55-73. https://doi.org/10.12989/gae.2014.7.1.055.
  21. Mohammadi, H. and Azad, A. (2021), "Prediction of ground settlement and the corresponding risk induced by tunneling: An application of rock engineering system paradigm", Tunn. Undergr. Sp. Technol., 110, 103828. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2021.103828.
  22. Nilsen, B. (2014), "Characteristics of water ingress in Norwegian subsea tunnels", Rock Mech. Rock Eng., 47(3), 933-945. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-012-0300-8.
  23. Quevedo, F.P.M.and Bernaud, D. (2018), "Parametric study of the convergence of deep tunnels with long term effects: Abacuses", Geomech. Eng., 15(4), 973-986. http://dx.doi.org/10.12989/gae.2018.15.4.973.
  24. Shin, J.H., Choi, K.C., Yoon, J.U. and Shin, Y.J. (2011), "Hydraulic significance of fractured zones in subsea tunnels", Mar. Geores. Geotechnol., 29(3), 230-247. https://doi.org/10.1080/1064119X.2011.555712.
  25. Wan, S. and Dong, J. (2014), "A possibility degree method for interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy multi-attribute group decision making", J. Comput. Syst. Sci., 80(1), 237-256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcss.2013.07.007.
  26. Wang, F. and Wan, S. (2020), "Possibility degree and divergence degree based method for interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy multi-attribute group decision making", Expert Syst. Appl., 141, 112929. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2019.112929.
  27. Wang, X., Li, S., Xu, Z., Li, X., Lin, P. and Lin, C. (2019), "An interval risk assessment method and management of water inflow and inrush in course of karst tunnel excavation", Tunn. Undergr. Sp. Technol., 92, 103033. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2019.103033.
  28. Wang, Y., Yang, W., Li, M. and Liu, X. (2012), "Risk assessment of floor water inrush in coal mines based on secondary fuzzy comprehensive evaluation", Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci., 52, 50-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2012.03.006.
  29. Wu, J., Xu, S., Zhou, R. and Qin, Y. (2016), "Scenario analysis of mine water inrush hazard using Bayesian networks", Saf. Sci., 89, 231-239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2016.06.013.
  30. Wu, Q., Zhao, D., Wang, Y., Shen, J., Mu, W. and Liu, H. (2017), "Method for assessing coal-floor water-inrush risk based on the variable-weight model and unascertained measure theory", Hydrogeol., J. 25(7), 2089-2103. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-017-1614-0.
  31. Wu, Y., Zhu, W., Li, X. and Gao, R. (1995), "Interval approach to analysis of hierarchy process", J. Tianjin Univ., 28(5), 700-705.
  32. Xue, Y., Li, Z., Li, S., Qiu, D., Su, M., Xu, Z., Zhou, B. and Tao, Y. (2019), "Water inrush risk assessment for an undersea tunnel crossing a fault: An analytical model", Mar. Geores. Geotechnol., 37(7), 816-827. https://doi.org/10.1080/1064119X.2018.1494230.
  33. Xue, Y., Kong, F., Li, S., Qiu, D., Su, M., Li, Z. and Zhou, B. (2021a), "Water and mud inrush hazard in underground engineering: Genesis, evolution and prevention", Tunn. Undergr. Sp. Technol., 114, 103987. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2021.103987.
  34. Xue, Y., Zhou, B., Ge, S., Qiu, D. and Gong, H. (2020), "Optimum design calculation method for the reasonable buried depth: A case study from Hong Kong-Zhuhai-Macao immersed tunnel", Ocean Eng., 206, 107275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2020.107275.
  35. Xue, Y., Zhou, B., Li, S., Qiu, D., Zhang, K. and Gong, H. (2021b), "Deformation rule and mechanical characteristic analysis of subsea tunnel crossing weathered trough", Tunn. Undergr. Sp. Technol., 114, 103989. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2021.103989.
  36. Zhang, J., Si L., Chen, J., Kizi, M., Wang, C. and Chen, Z. (2020), "Stimulation Techniques of Coalbed Methane Reservoirs", Geofluids, 5152646. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/5152646.