Acknowledgement
본 연구는 대한민국 교육부와 한국연구재단의 글로벌 연구네트워크 지원사업의 지원을 받아 수행된 연구임 (NRF-2017S1A2A2041854).
References
- Bahnik, S., & Strack, F. (2016). Overlap of accessible information undermines the anchoring effect. Judgment and Decision Making, 11(1).
- Blankenship, K. L., Wegener, D. T., Petty, R. E., Detweiler-Bedell, B., & Macy, C. L. (2008). Elaboration and consequences of anchored estimates: An attitudinal perspective on numerical anchoring. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44(6), 1465-1476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2008.07.005
- Bokati, L., Kreinovich, V., & Le, C. V. (2021, January). How to Explain the Anchoring Formula in Behavioral Economics. In International Econometric Conference of Vietnam (pp. 28-34). Springer, Cham.
- Caputo, A. (2014). Relevant information, personality traits and anchoring effect. International Journal of Management and Decision Making, 13(1), 62-76. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMDM.2014.058470
- Chapman, G. B., & Johnson, E. J. (1994). The limits of anchoring. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 7(4), 223-242. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.3960070402
- Chapman, G. B., & Johnson, E. J. (1999). Anchoring, activation, and the construction of values. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 79(2), 115-153. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1999.2841
- Englich, B. (2008). When knowledge matters-differential effects of available knowledge in standard and basic anchoring tasks. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38(5), 896-904. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.479
- Englich, B., & Mussweiler, T. (2001). Sentencing under uncertainty: Anchoring effects in the courtroom 1. Journal of applied social psychology, 31(7), 1535-1551. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2001.tb02687.x
- Englich, B., Mussweiler, T., & Strack, F. (2005). The last word in court-A hidden disadvantage for the defense. Law and Human Behavior, 29(6), 705-722. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-005-8380-7
- Englich, B., Mussweiler, T., & Strack, F. (2006). Playing dice with criminal sentences: The influence of irrelevant anchors on experts' judicial decision making. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32(2), 188-200. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167205282152
- Epley, N., & Gilovich, T. (2001). Putting adjustment back in the anchoring and adjustment heuristic: Differential processing of self-generated and experimenter-provided anchors. Psychological science, 12(5), 391-396. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00372
- Epley, N., & Gilovich, T. (2005). When effortful thinking influences judgmental anchoring: differential effects of forewarning and incentives on self generated and externally provided anchors. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 18(3), 199-212. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.495
- Jacowitz, K. E., & Kahneman, D. (1995). Measures of anchoring in estimation tasks. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21(11), 1161-1166. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672952111004
- Lieder, F., Griffiths, T. L., Huys, Q. J., & Goodman, N. D. (2018). The anchoring bias reflects rational use of cognitive resources. Psychonomic bulletin & review, 25(1), 322-349. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-017-1286-8
- Markovits, H., Thompson, V. A., & Brisson, J. (2015). Metacognition and abstract reasoning. Memory & cognition, 43(4), 681-693. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-014-0488-9
- Mussweiler, T., & Strack, F. (1999). Comparing is believing: A selective accessibility model of judgmental anchoring. European review of social psychology, 10(1), 135-167. https://doi.org/10.1080/14792779943000044
- Mussweiler, T., & Strack, F. (2000). Numeric judgments under uncertainty: The role of knowledge in anchoring. Journal of experimental social psychology, 36(5), 495-518. https://doi.org/10.1006/jesp.1999.1414
- Mussweiler, T., Englich, B., & Strack, F. (2012). Anchoring effect. In Cognitive illusions (pp. 195-212). Psychology Press.
- Northcraft, G. B., & Neale, M. A. (1987). Experts, amateurs, and real estate: An anchoringand-adjustment perspective on property pricing decisions. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 39(1), 84-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(87)90046-x
- Petty, R. E., & Wegener, D. T. (1998). Matching versus mismatching attitude functions: Implications for scrutiny of persuasive messages. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24(3), 227-240. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167298243001
- Petty, R. E., Cacioppo, J. T., & Goldman, R. (1981). Personal involvement as a determinant of argument-based persuasion. Journal of personality and social psychology, 41(5), 847. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.41.5.847
- Petty, R. E., Cacioppo, J. T., & Schumann, D. (1983). Central and peripheral routes to advertising effectiveness: The moderating role of involvement. Journal of consumer research, 10(2), 135-146. https://doi.org/10.1086/208954
- Petty, R. E., Schumann, D. W., Richman, S. A., & Strathman, A. J. (1993). Positive mood and persuasion: Different roles for affect under high-and low-elaboration conditions. Journal of personality and social psychology, 64(1), 5. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.64.1.5
- Shynkaruk, J. M., & Thompson, V. A. (2006). Confidence and accuracy in deductive reasoning. Memory & cognition, 34(3), 619-632. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193584
- Smith, A. R., & Windschitl, P. D. (2011). Biased calculations: Numeric anchors influence answers to math equations. Judgment and Decision Making, 6(2), 139.
- Smith, A. R., & Windschitl, P. D. (2015). Resisting anchoring effects: The roles of metric and mapping knowledge. Memory & cognition, 43(7), 1071-1084. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-015-0524-4
- Smith, A. R., Windschitl, P. D., & Bruchmann, K. (2013). Knowledge matters: Anchoring effects are moderated by knowledge level. European Journal of Social Psychology, 43(1), 97-108. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.1921
- Strack, F., & Mussweiler, T. (1997). Explaining the enigmatic anchoring effect: Mechanisms of selective accessibility. Journal of personality and social psychology, 73(3), 437. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.73.3.437
- Thorsteinson, T. J. (2011). Initiating Salary Discussions With an Extreme Request: Anchoring Effects on Initial Salary Offers 1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 41(7), 1774-1792. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2011.00779.x
- Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185(4157), 1124-1131. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.185.4157.1124
- Wegener, T., Petty, E., Blankenship, L., & Detweiler-Bedell, B. (2010). Elaboration and numerical anchoring: Implications of attitude theories for consumer judgment and decision making. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 20(1), 5-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2009.12.003
- Wegener, T., Petty, E., Detweiler-Bedell, T., & Jarvis, G. (2001). Implications of attitude change theories for numerical anchoring: Anchor plausibility and the limits of anchor effectiveness. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 37(1), 62-69. https://doi.org/10.1006/jesp.2000.1431
- Yang, C., Sun, B., & Shanks, D. R. (2018). The anchoring effect in metamemory monitoring. Memory & Cognition, 46(3), 384-397. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-017-0772-6