DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Multimedia Technologies in Modern Educational Practices: Audiovisual Context

  • Mozhenko, Mykola (Cinema and Television Arts Department, Kyiv National University of Culture and Arts) ;
  • Donchyk, Andrii (Cinema and Television Arts Department, Kyiv National University of Culture and Arts) ;
  • Yushchenko, Anton (Cinema and Television Arts Department, Kyiv National University of Culture and Arts) ;
  • Suchkov, Denys (Cinema and Television Arts Department, Kyiv National University of Culture and Arts) ;
  • Yelenskyi, Roman (Cinema and Television Arts Department, Kyiv National University of Culture and Arts)
  • Received : 2022.03.05
  • Published : 2022.03.30

Abstract

In modern educational practices, the issue of dependence on the experience of using multimedia by students and the adoption of technologies in education, the perception of their benefits and effectiveness in blended learning is little covered. The purpose of the academic paper lies in assessing the audiovisual context of multimedia technologies, its acceptance by students in practice on the example of using video lectures in blended learning. The methodology is based on an online survey of 120 students of Ukrainian universities who have assessed the experience level in using video lectures, as well as the constructs as follows: Technology Characteristics, Fit, Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, Attitude, Intention to Use, Actual Use. The results show that the majority of students use video lectures to a certain extent in their training (20,8% have used technology to a certain extent, 49,2% have often used technology in training, 20% are regular users of technology). It has been revealed that most students agree with the relevance of video lectures, the accuracy of lectures, the brevity of lectures, the clarity of lectures, as well as the high quality of lecture videos. It has been estimated that 42,5% believe that lecture videos are an effective tool towards supporting students in hybrid learning. 26,7% of students consider video lectures to be appropriate technologies for online / hybrid courses. In general, 37,5% of respondents find video lectures useful; however, 35,0% do not agree with this statement. 83,3% of students have rated the high level of ease of access to video. In total, 95% of students find lecture videos easy to use. In general, positive attitude of students to video lectures has been revealed.

Keywords

References

  1. Abdulrahaman, M. D., Faruk, N., Oloyede, A. A., Surajudeen-Bakinde, N. T., Olawoyin, L. A., Mejabi, O. V., ... & Azeez, A. L. (2020). Multimedia tools in the teaching and learning processes: A systematic review. Heliyon, 6(11), e05312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05312
  2. Adi, S., Firmansyah, G., Utomo, I. B., & Permana, R. (2021, November). The Importance of Multimedia Technology in pe Learning. In 6th International Conference on Science, Education and Technology (ISET 2020) (pp. 182-185). Atlantis Press.
  3. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 50(2), 179-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-t
  4. Amirov, M. M. (2020). Multimedia technology in education. Ebpaзийckoe Hayyhoe Obbeдnhehne, (3-1), 55-58.
  5. Bartlett, R. M., & Strough, J. (2003). Multimedia versus traditional course instruction in introductory social psychology. Teaching of Psychology, 30(4), 335-338. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328023TOP3004_07
  6. Clark, R., & Mayer, R. (2016). E-Learning and the Science of Instruction: Proven Guidelines for Consumers and Designers of Multimedia Learning: John Wiley & Sons.
  7. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 319-340.
  8. Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35(8), 982-1003. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982
  9. Johnson, D. A., & Christensen, J. (2011). A comparison of simplified-visually rich and traditional presentation styles. Teaching of Psychology, 38, 293-297. https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628311421333
  10. Mayer, R. E. (2002). Multimedia learning. Psychology of learning and motivation, 41, 85-139. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-7421(02)80005-6
  11. Mayer, R. E. (2005). Cognitive Theory of Multimedia Learning. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning (pp. 31-48). New York: Cambridge University Press.
  12. Mayer, R. E. (2009). Multimedia Learning (2nd ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press
  13. Pang, Z. (2021). Application of preschool education major in applied universities based on multimedia technology research on process management innovation in teaching process. The International Journal of Electrical Engineering & Education, 0020720920985041.
  14. Park, C., & Raven, A. (2015). Information quality as a determinant of task-technology fit in using communication technology for simple task. Issues in Information Systems, 16(1), 189-199. https://doi.org/10.5859/KAIS.2015.24.2.189
  15. Park, C., Kim, D. G., Cho, S., & Han, H. J. (2019). Adoption of multimedia technology for learning and gender difference. Computers in Human Behavior, 92, 288-296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.11.029
  16. Shin, D. (2015). Effect of the customer experience on satisfaction with smartphones: Assessing smart satisfaction index with partial least squares. Telecommunications Policy, 39(8), 627-641. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2014.10.001
  17. Shin, D. (2017a). Conceptualizing and measuring quality of experience of the internet of things: Exploring how quality is perceived by users. Information & Management, 54(8), 998- 1011. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2017.02.006
  18. Shin, D. (2017b). The role of affordance in the experience of virtual reality learning: Technological and affective affordances in virtual reality. Telematics and Informatics, 34(8), 1826-1836. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2017.05.013
  19. Shin, D. (2018). Empathy and embodied experience in virtual environment: To what extent can virtual reality stimulate empathy and embodied experience? Computers in Human Behavior, 78, 64-73. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.09.012
  20. Shin, D., Biocca, F., & Choo, H. (2013). Exploring the user experience of three-dimensional virtual learning environments. Behaviour & Information Technology, 32(2), 203-214. doi:10.1080/0144929X.2011.606334
  21. Smith, S. M., & Woody, P. C. (2000). Interactive effect of multimedia instruction and learning styles. Teaching of Psychology, 27, 220-223. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328023TOP2703_10
  22. Yen, D. C., Wu, C.-S., Cheng, F.-F., & Huang, Y.-W. (2010). Determinants of users' intention to adopt wireless technology: An empirical study by integrating TTF with TAM. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(5), 906-915. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.02.005
  23. Zhang, D., Zhou, L., Briggs, R. O., & Nunamaker, J. F. (2006). Instructional video in e-learning: Assessing the impact of interactive video on learning effectiveness. Information & Management, 43(1), 15-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2005.01.004
  24. Zhang, Z., Li, Z., Han, M., Su, Z., Li, W., & Pan, Z. (2021). An augmented reality-based multimedia environment for experimental education. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 80(1), 575-590. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-020-09684-x