Journal of Convergence for Information Technology (융합정보논문지)

Convergence Society for SMB (중소기업융합학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

How Should We Respond to the Collapse of the Global Value Chain? An In-Depth Investigation of Disruptive Events and Risk Management Strategies in SMEs

글로벌 가치사슬의 붕괴에 어떻게 대응해야 하는가? 분열적 상황의 심층규명과 중소기업의 위험관리 전략에 관한 연구

  • Kwon, Se-In (Korea Institute of S&T Evaluation and Planning) ;
  • Yang, Jong-Gon (Department of Business Administration, Dankook University)
  • Received : 2022.03.20
  • Accepted : 2022.05.20
  • Published : 2022.05.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to identify the drivers of supply chain vulnerability and internal/external disruptive events and to verify the moderating effect of SCRM to mitigate negative disruption impacts. The analysis results of 182 SMEs are as follows. First, SC vulnerability proceeded from excessive efficiency. Second, the probability and severity of internal factors were higher than that of external factors. In particular, the priority of responding to risks arising from the supply chain process was higher than the value chain within the firm. Finally, the higher the level of risk management in the supply chain, the more positively the negative disruption impact was mitigated. This study is valuable in providing practical clues to the decision-making of a firm's managers and policymakers responding to supply chain risks.

본 연구는 공급사슬 취약성의 동인과 내·외부 분열적 상황을 규명하고 공급사슬 위험관리가 성과 피해를 완화하는 조절효과를 검증하는 것을 목적으로 한다. 182개 중소기업을 대상으로 한 분석결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 공급사슬 취약성은 글로벌화, 제품 다양화 등 기업의 과도한 효율성에서 비롯되었음을 확인하였다. 둘째, 외부 환경적 분열요인보다 내부요인의 발생 가능성과 심각성이 더욱 높게 나타났다. 특히, 기업 내부의 가치사슬보다는 기업 간 공급사슬 프로세스에서 발생하는 위험의 대응 우선순위가 높았다. 마지막으로 공급사슬 위험관리의 수준이 높을수록 성과 피해를 긍정적으로 완화하는 조절효과가 나타났다. 본 연구는 공급사슬 위험에 대응하는 기업실무자와 정책 입안자의 의사결정에 실행적 단서를 제공하는 것에 가치가 있다.

Keywords

References

  1. M. Hammer. (2001). The superefficient company. Harvard Business Review, 79(8), 82-93.
  2. C. Steinle & H. Schiele. (2008). Limits to global sourcing?: Strategic consequences of dependency on international suppliers: Cluster theory, resource-based view and case studies. Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management, 14(1), 3-14. DOI : 10.1016/j.pursup.2008.01.001
  3. Y. Sheffi & J. B. Rice Jr. (2005). A supply chain view of the resilient enterprise. MIT Sloan Management Review, 47(1), 41-48.
  4. C. S. Tang, J. D. Zimmerman & J. I. Nelson. (2009). Managing new product development and supply chain risks: The Boeing 787 case. In Supply Chain Forum: An International Journal, 10(2), 74-86. DOI : 10.1080/16258312.2009.11517219
  5. S. Chopra & M. Sodhi. (2014). Reducing the risk of supply chain disruptions. MIT Sloan Management Review, 55(3), 72-80.
  6. S. Kumar & T. Havey. (2013). Before and after disaster strikes: A relief supply chain decision support framework. International Journal of Production Economics, 145(2), 613-629. DOI : 10.1016/j.ijpe.2013.05.016
  7. Supply Chain Movement. (2020). SCM Quarterly Magazine. (Online). https://www.supplychainmovement.com
  8. International Trade Centre. (2020). COVID-19: The Great Lockdown and its Impact on Small Business. SME Competitiveness Outlook. Geneva : ITC Publishing.
  9. H. Babu, P. Bhardwaj & A. Agrawal. (2021). Assessment and prioritisation of risks and SCRM strategies in Indian small and medium enterprises supply chains': A SCRM-AHP model. International Journal of Agile Systems & Management, 14(2), 313-332. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJASM.2021.10041666
  10. S. Lund et al. (2020). Risk, Resilience, and Rebalancing in Global Value Chains. D.C. : McKinsey Global Institute.
  11. M. Saenz & E. Revilla. (2014). Creating resilient supply chains. MIT Sloan Management Review, 55(4), 22-24.
  12. T. Pettit, J. Fiksel & K. L. Croxton. (2010). Ensuring supply chain resilience: Development of a conceptual framework. Journal of Business Logistics, 31(1), 1-21. DOI : 10.1002/j.2158-1592.2010.tb00125.x
  13. S. Chopra & M. S. Sodhi. (2004). Supply-chain breakdown. MIT Sloan Management Review, 46(1), 53-61.
  14. M. Christopher & H. Peck. (2004). Building the resilient supply chain. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 15(2), 1-14. DOI : 10.1108/09574090410700275
  15. J. H. Thun & D. Hoenig. (2011). An empirical analysis of supply chain risk management in the German automotive industry. International Journal of Production Economics, 131(1), 242-249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2009.10.010
  16. D. Ivanov. (2021). Lean resilience: AURA (Active Usage of Resilience Assets) framework for postCOVID-19 supply chain management. The International Journal of Logistics Management. Ahead-of-print. DOI : 10.1108/IJLM-11-2020-0448
  17. M. Christopher & H. Lee. (2004). Mitigating supply chain risk through improved confidence. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 3(5), 388-396. DOI : 10.1108/09600030410545436
  18. S. M. Lee & J. S. Rha. (2016). Ambidextrous supply chain as a dynamic capability: Building a resilient supply chain. Management Decision, 54(1), 2-23. DOI : 10.1108/MD-12-2014-0674
  19. G. A. Zsidisin & S. M. Wagner. (2010). Do perceptions become reality? The moderating role of supply chain resiliency on disruption occurrence. Journal of Business Logistics, 31(2), 1-20. DOI : 10.1002/j.2158-1592.2010.tb00140.x
  20. A. Wieland & C. Wallenburg. (2012). Dealing with supply chain risks: Linking risk management practices and strategies to performance. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 42(10), 887-905. DOI : 10.1108/09600031211281411
  21. M. S. Sodhi, B. G. Son & C. S. Tang. (2012). Researchers' perspectives on supply chain risk management. Production & Operations Management, 21(1), 1-13. DOI : 10.1111/j.1937-5956.2011.01251.x
  22. S. J. Juan, E. Y. Li & W. H. Hung. (2021). An integrated model of supply chain resilience and its impact on supply chain performance under disruption. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 33(1), 339-364.
  23. U. Juttner & S. Maklan. (2011). Supply chain resilience in the global financial crisis: An empirical study. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 16(4), 246-259. DOI : 10.1108/13598541111139062
  24. R. Sreedevi & H. Saranga. (2017). Uncertainty and supply chain risk: The moderating role of supply chain flexibility in risk mitigation. International Journal of Production Economics, 193, 332-342. DOI : 10.1016/j.ijpe.2017.07.024
  25. R. M. Baron & D. A. Kenny. (1986). The moderator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182. DOI : 10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173