DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

거주지역에 따른 노인 커뮤니티시설 사용 및 요구에 관한 연구 - 대도시, 중소도시, 농촌 지역의 차이 비교 -

Elderly Needs in Community Facilities Within Residential Areas - Comparing the Differences Between Metropolitan cities, Small and Medium-size cities, and Rural Areas -

  • 김혜신 (울산연구원 공공투자센터) ;
  • 박수빈 (부산대학교 실내환경디자인학과 및 생활환경연구소)
  • Kim, Hye-Shin (Public Investment Center Ulsan Research Institute) ;
  • Park, Soobeen (Dept of Interior & Environmental Design, Institution of Human Ecology, Pusan National University)
  • 투고 : 2022.01.25
  • 심사 : 2022.04.25
  • 발행 : 2022.05.30

초록

A healthy and successful retirement life is increasingly becoming important along with cultivating a physical environment that provides a variety of community activities in common living areas. This study focuses on identifying elderly needs in community facilities according to the scope and size of the residential areas. Through literature review, the community status by region, the concept and components of the elderly community, and the classification of elderly activities within the community were discussed. Additionally, a survey research tool was develop and utilized in the form of a structured questionnaire. Elderly people in their 60s and 70s living in a metropolitan city, a small or medium-sized town, and a rural area responded to this questionnaire. The results and conclusions indicated that the main form of transportation to a community facility for the elderly was walking; the most popular community activities involved 'leisure and/or hobbies' and 'walking and/or exercise'. While analyzing the demand and satisfaction of senior welfare facilities, the demand for 'medical facilities', 'welfare facilities', and 'neighborhood sports facilities' placed the highest in all regions; however, the demand for religious facilities was the lowest. The results of this study can provide direction for community planning and is expected to be used as data that enables aging in place for seniors.

키워드

과제정보

이 논문은 부산대학교 기본연구지원사업(2년)에 의하여 연구되었음.

참고문헌

  1. Gyeonggi Research Institute (2018), Quality of Life and Territory of Residential Activities in Neighborhood: In the Perspective of the Elderly in Gyeonggi-Do, Korea, GRI
  2. Han, S. (2011), Social leisure activity and life satisfaction of the elderly - focused on the leisure satisfaction and loneliness, Korea Journal of Social Welfare Studies, 42(3), 157-182. https://doi.org/10.16999/kasws.2011.42.3.157
  3. Hwang, K., & Kim, S. (2016). The centrality and core factors of the elderly's social activities : with the reference of neighborhood facilities, The Korean Journal of Local Government Studies, 20(1), 375-401. https://doi.org/10.20484/klog.20.1.16
  4. Kim, A., (2015). A Study on the Community Activity and Social Network for the Aged in Renewal Project: Focused on the Project of Yonnam-dong and Buk Gajwa-dong, Seoul, Ph.D. thesis, Hanyang University
  5. Kim, Y., & Ahn, K.(2012). Analysis on the elderly's catchment area of neighborhood facilities, Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea Planning & Design, 28(5), 215-222. https://doi.org/10.5659/JAIK_PD.2012.28.5.215
  6. Kim, Y., & Lee, S. (2008), Social participation and subjective wellbeing of elderly in Seoul and Chuncheon area, Journal of Korea Gerontological Society, 28(1), 1-18.
  7. Kim, Y., (2012) Neighborhood Environmental Factors Enhancing the Quality of Life among Urban Elderly Population - Focused on the Independent Living Ability and the Social Support, Ph.D thesis, Seoul National University.
  8. Ministry of Culture, Sport and Tourism (2019), National Cultural Infrastructure Overview
  9. Ministry of Culture, Sport and Tourism (2019). National Public Sports Facility Status
  10. Ministry of Health and Welfare (2018). Monitoring Research on Medical Vulnerable Area
  11. Ministry of Health and Welfare (2019). Status of Welfare Facilities for the Elderly
  12. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport (2019). City Planning Status
  13. Park, M., & Lee Y. (2003). A study on the leisure time of the Korean elderly, Journal of Korean Home Management Association 21(1), 37-48.