Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea (대한건축학회논문집)

Architectural Institute of Korea (대한건축학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Design Ground Motion Selecting Method for Nonlinear Time History Analysis by Correlating Fundamental Period and Mean Period

비선형시간이력해석을 위한 건축물의 고유주기와 지진파의 평균주기가 연동된 설계지진파 선정방법

  • Kim, Kang San (Dept. of Architecture and Architectural Engineering, Yonsei University) ;
  • Choi, Insub (Dept. of Architecture and Architectural Engineering, Yonsei University) ;
  • Kim, JunHee (Dept. of Architecture and Architectural Engineering, Yonsei University)
  • Received : 2022.01.03
  • Accepted : 2022.05.03
  • Published : 2022.05.30
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Nonlinear time history analysis (NTHA) has become a considerable option for seismic design. For complex and irregular structures, a NTHA derives realistic displacement that leads to efficient seismic design. However, regions without sufficient earthquake records face issues when determining which earthquake is most suitable for their site condition. In this study, a selection method for design ground motion used in the nonlinear time history analysis was developed by correlating the fundamental period of buildings and the mean period of ground motions. From existing literature, the relationship between the maximum displacement and the fundamental period normalized to the mean period was determined. A total of 200 NTHA was performed to establish the relationship of reinforced concrete (RC) piloti-type structures by statistically correlating them between the fundamental period and the mean period with the maximum displacement. By statistical means from RC piloti structure's NTHA distribution, the regression curve and the 70% confidence interval were derived. This correlation determined the period ratio range category where the earthquake's NTHA displacements were compared to the pseudo displacement of the design spectrum method. For the suggested piloti prototype model, it was concluded that the period ratio of 0.75-1.5 was a category that could determine whether the earthquake's NTHA displacement was greater or less than the linear elastic response spectrum method.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

이 연구는 2021도 정부(교육과학기술부)의 재원으로 한국연구재단의 지원을 받아 수행된 연구임. 과제번호: NRF-2021R1A2C2007064, NFR-2021R1C1C2004310.

References

  1. KDS. (2019). Seismic Building Design Code (KDS 41 17 00), Korean Design Standard.
  2. Kumar, M., Castro, J. M., Stafford, P. J., & Elghazouli, A. Y. (2011). Influence of the mean period of ground motion on the inelastic dynamic response of single and multi degree of freedom systems. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 40(3), 237-256. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.1013
  3. Hickey, J., & Broderick, B. (2019). Influence of mean period of ground motion on inelastic drift demands in cbfs designed to eurocode 8. Engineering Structures, 182, 172-184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.12.055
  4. Karavasilis, T. L., Bazeos, N., & Beskos, D. E. (2007). Estimation of seismic drift and ductility demands in planar regular X-braced steel frames. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 36(15), 2273-2289. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.728
  5. Karavasilis, T. L., Seo, C. Y., & Makris, N. (2011). Dimensional response analysis of bilinear systems subjected to non-pulselike earthquake ground motions. Journal of Structural Engineering, 137(5), 600-606. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)st.1943-541x.0000305
  6. Katsanos, E. I., & Sextos, A. G. (2018). Structure - specific selection of earthquake ground motions for the reliable design and assessment of structures. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 16(2), 583-611. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-017-0226-3
  7. Ha, S. J., Han, S. W., & Ji, H. W. (2017). Assessment of Code-specified Ground Motion Selection Criteria with Accurate Selection and Scaling Methods-I Ground Motion Selection. Journal of the Earthquake Engineering Society of Korea, 21(4), 171-179. https://doi.org/10.5000/EESK.2017.21.4.171
  8. Ha, S. J. (2020). An Evaluation on Seismic Design Criteria for Ground Motions Selection for Three-Dimensional Time History Analysis of Structures. Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea, 36(7), 139-146. https://doi.org/10.5659/JAIK.2020.36.7.139
  9. Rathje, E. M., Abrahamson, N. A., & Bray, J. D. (1998). Simplified frequency content estimates of earthquake ground motions. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 124(2), 150-159. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(1998)124:2(150)
  10. Shome, N. (1999). Probabilistic seismic demand analysis of nonlinear structures.
  11. Elenas, A., & Meskouris, K. (2001). Correlation study between seismic acceleration parameters and damage indices of structures. Engineering Structures, 23(6), 698-704. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(00)00074-2
  12. Reyes, J. C., & Kalkan, E. (2012). How many records should be used in an ASCE/SEI-7 ground motion scaling procedure?. Earthquake Spectra, 28(3), 1223-1242. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.4000066
  13. Sohn, J. H., Choi, I., & Kim, J. (2020). Effect of vertical irregularity on displacement concentration in building seismic design based on linear analysis. Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea, 36(6), 193-200. https://doi.org/10.5659/JAIK.2020.36.6.193
  14. Sohn, J. H., Choi, I., & Kim, J. (2022). Development of limit states for seismic fragility assessment of piloti-type structures verified with observed damage data. Engineering Structures, 251, 113562. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.113562
  15. Chopra, A. K., & Chintanapakdee, C. (2004). Inelastic deformation ratios for design and evaluation of structures: single-degree-of-freedom bilinear systems. Journal of Structural Engineering, 130(9), 1309-1319. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)0733-9445(2004)130:9(1309)
  16. Shin, J. W., Oh, S. H., & Yang, W. J. (2021). Review of Selection Technique of Design Seismic Wave According to Seismic Design Standards for Buildings. Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea, 37(6), 199-206. https://doi.org/10.5659/JAIK.2021.37.6.199