한국비블리아학회지 (Journal of the Korean BIBLIA Society for library and Information Science)

한국비블리아학회 (Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

학습자를 위한 웹듀이의 사용성 증진 방안 연구

A Study on Improving Usability of Webdewey for Learners

  • 백지원 (숭의여자대학교 문헌정보과)
  • 투고 : 2022.05.16
  • 심사 : 2022.06.02
  • 발행 : 2022.06.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구는 분류 학습의 기본 도구가 된 웹듀이의 발전 및 기능 변화를 분석하고, 이를 학습자를 위한 사용성의 측면에서 분석하여, 웹듀이의 사용성 증진을 위한 구체적인 방안을 제안하는 목적을 가지고 수행되었다. 이러한 연구 목적을 달성하기 위하여 먼저 UI와 사용성의 개념과 원칙을 정리하고, 웹듀이의 구성 및 주요 기능을 분석하였다. 또한, 웹듀이의 매체 변화 및 시기별 기능 변화를 고찰하였다. 이후 웹듀이를 학습 과정에서 사용한 학습자들을 대상으로 웹듀이 사용성에 관한 의견 조사를 수행하고, 여기서 도출된 시사점과 개선 방향성을 바탕으로 웹듀이의 사용성 증진 방안을 제안하였다. 사용성 증진 방안은 UI의 측면과 합성 기능의 측면으로 나누어 제안되었다. UI의 측면에서는 디스플레이 방식, 시각화 장치, 인쇄본의 장점 도입, 한국어 버전 개발 등의 제안이 이루어졌다. 번호 자동 합성 기능의 측면에서는 기본 번호 선택, 합성 경로 안내 및 오류 메시지 제공, 참고 주기 및 경로 신설, 화면과 버튼 설계, 합성 내역 안내 등의 측면에서 사용성 증진 제안이 이루어졌다.

This study was carried out with the aim of analyzing the development and functional changes of Webdewey, which has become a basic tool of classification learning, analyzing it in terms of usability for learners, and suggesting specific ways to improve WebDewey's usability. In order to achieve this research objective, the concepts and principles of UI and usability were first laid out, and Webdewey's structure and key functions were analyzed. Since then, Webdewey's media changes and periodical feature changes have been analyzed. In addition, an opinion survey was conducted on the usability of WebDewey among learners who used WebDewey in the learning process, and proposed ways to improve WebDewey's usability based on the implications and direction of improvement derived from it. In terms of UI, proposals have been made to introduce display methods, visualization devices, the advantages of printed versions, and the development of Korean versions. In terms of the 'Create built number' function, suggestions have been made to improve usability in terms of basic number selection, composite route guidance and error message provision, new reference and route construction, screen and button design, and built-number component guidance.

키워드

과제정보

본 논문은 2020학년도 숭의여자대학교 학술연구비 지원에 의해 연구되었음.

참고문헌

  1. Baek, J., & Choi, Y. (2021). A study on classification education using webdewey: based on learning outcomes and learner satisfaction survey by DDC medium type. Journal of the Korean BIBLIA Society for Library and Information Science, 32(3), 5-21. https://doi.org/10.14699/KBIBLIA.2021.32.3.005
  2. Grant, W. (2019). 101 UX principles a definitive design guide. Seoul: Acorn.
  3. Jo, S. B. (2020). This is UX/UI Design. Paju: Wikibooks.
  4. Lee, E. & Lee, J. (2003). A study on the development of usability evaluation criteria in digital library website. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 20(3), 129-153. https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2003.20.3.129
  5. Lee, H. & Park, K. (2009). A strategy of learner-centered usability evaluation for quality management in e-learning contents development. Journal of Korean Association for Educational Information and Media, 15(3), 63-88.
  6. Lee, J. & Kim, S. (2013). Development of evaluation tool for educational applications. Proceedings of the Korean Society of Computer Information Conference, 21(1), 149-152.
  7. Shinichi, T., Ryusuki, M., Sato, T., Bunmei, O, Shinsaku, T., & IMJA (2020). A book to get started with UX design: from usability assessments to customer journey maps. Seoul: Booklab.
  8. Beall, J. (2013). Number building, new things in DDC, use of DDC for shelving in public libraries. The world's libraries. Connected. The Number Building: User Contribution Tool in Web Dewey. EDUG Symposium. https://slideplayer.com/slide/3471176/
  9. Ergonomics of human-system interaction. ISO 9241-11.
  10. Hider, P. (2004). Learning to classify: online versus printed dewey. Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science, 9(2), 15-25.
  11. Hudon, M. (2011). Teaching classification in the 21st century. Knowledge Organization, 38(4), 342-351. http://doi.org/10.7152/nasko.v3i1.12791
  12. Krug, S. (2014). Don't make me think, revisited: a common sense approach to Web usability (3rd ed.). Berkeley: New Riders.
  13. Kyrios, Alex (2022, March 3 ~ 2022, April 15). Interview by author [email].
  14. Lohr, L. L. & Eikleberry, C. (2002). Learner-centered usability. Tools for creating a J learnerfriendly instructional environment. Performance Improvement, 40(4), 24-27. https://doi.org/10.1002/pfi.4140400406
  15. Mengel, T., DNB, Werling, P., & Pansoft (2017). New features in DDC applications. EDUG Symposium. https://slideplayer.com/slide/12484756/
  16. Nielsen, J. (1999). Designing web usability: the practice of simplicity. Indianapolis: New Riders Pub.
  17. Taylor, A. G. (2006). Teaching the dewey decimal classification System. Cataloging and Classification Quarterly, 42(3/4), 97-117. https://doi.org/10.1300/J104v42n03_03