DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

하악골 편측 절제 환자에서 High Performance Polymer (PEKK)를 이용한 임플란트 지지형 고정성 보철 수복 증례

Implant-supported fixed prosthetic restoration using a high performance polymer (PEKK) in a mandibular unilateral resection: A case report

  • 공대룡 (조선대학교 치과대학 보철학교실) ;
  • 민경원 (조선대학교 치과대학 보철학교실) ;
  • 장기열 (조선대학교 치과대학 보철학교실) ;
  • 이경제 (조선대학교 치과대학 보철학교실) ;
  • 이선행 (조선대학교 치과대학 보철학교실)
  • Kong, Dae-Ryong (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Chosun University) ;
  • Min, Gyeong-Won (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Chosun University) ;
  • Jang, Ki-Yeol (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Chosun University) ;
  • Lee, Gyeong-Je (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Chosun University) ;
  • Lee, Sun-Haeng (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Chosun University)
  • 투고 : 2022.04.12
  • 심사 : 2022.05.31
  • 발행 : 2022.07.29

초록

편악 부분 무치악 환자를 치료하는 경우, 적절한 수복 재료를 사용하는 것이 중요하다. 적절하지 않은 수복 재료는 보철 수복의 결과에 좋지 않은 영향을 줄 수 있다. 현재 널리 사용되고 있는 재료들인 지르코니아와 치과용 합금은 피질골보다 탄성 계수가 높아 외력 발생시 임플란트 및 임플란트 주위 골에 유해한 힘을 가할 수 있다. 최근 새롭게 소개된 재료인 Polyetherketoneketone (PEKK)은 피질골과 유사한 탄성계수를 가졌으며, 물리적 특성 및 생체 친화성에 있어서도 많은 이점을 가지고 있다. 본 증례에서는 PEKK를 이용한 임플란트 지지형 고정성 보철치료를 진행하였고 기능적, 심미적으로 만족할 만한 결과를 얻었기에 이를 보고하는 바이다.

When treating partial edentulous patients, it is important to use an appropriate restorative materials. Inappropriate restorative materials can adversely affect the outcome of prosthetic restorations. Zirconia and dental metal, which are currently and widely used materials, have a higher elastic modulus than cortical bone, so when an external force is generated, a harmful force can be applied to the implant and the bone around the implant. Polyetherketoneketone (PEKK), a recently introduced material, has a elastic modulus similar to that of cortical bone, and has many advantages in terms of physical properties and biocompatibility. This case report describes that implant-supported fixed prosthetic treatment using PEKK was performed, and functional and esthetic satisfactory results were obtained.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Budtz-Jorgensen E. Restoration of the partially edentulous mouth--a comparison of overdentures, removable partial dentures, fixed partial dentures and implant treatment. J Dent 1996;24:237-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/0300-5712(95)00075-5
  2. Palmqvist S, Sondell K, Swartz B. Implant-supported maxillary overdentures: outcome in planned and emergency cases. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1994;9:184-90.
  3. Sadowsky SJ. The implant-supported prosthesis for the edentulous arch: design considerations. J Prosthet Dent 1997;78:28-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(97)70084-2
  4. Chan MF, Narhi TO, de Baat C, Kalk W. Treatment of the atrophic edentulous maxilla with implant-supported overdentures: a review of the literature. Int J Prosthodont 1998;11:7-15.
  5. Carlson ER, Marx RE. The ameloblastoma: primary, curative surgical management. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2006;64:484-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2005.11.032
  6. Fabrizio C, Manuel F, Vito S, Dario M, Gianluca P. Implant-supported rehabilitation of a patient with mandibular ameloblastoma. Ann Stomatol (Roma) 2012;3:21-5.
  7. Iizuka T, Hafliger J, Seto I, Rahal A, Mericske-Stern R, Smolka K. Oral rehabilitation after mandibular reconstruction using an osteocutaneous fibula free flap with endosseous implants. Factors affecting the functional outcome in patients with oral cancer. Clin Oral Implants Res 2005;16:69-79. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.01076.x
  8. Chan MF, Hayter JP, Cawood JI, Howell RA. Oral rehabilitation with implant-retained prostheses following ablative surgery and reconstruction with free flaps. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1997;12:820-7.
  9. Schepers RH, Slagter AP, Kaanders JH, van den Hoogen FJ, Merkx MA. Effect of postoperative radiotherapy on the functional result of implants placed during ablative surgery for oral cancer. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2006;35:803-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2006.03.007
  10. Mian W, Garima B, Thomas JW. Antibacterial properties of PEKK for orthopedic applications. Int J Nanomedicine 2017;12:6471-6. https://doi.org/10.2147/IJN.S134983
  11. Skinner HB. Composite technology for total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1988;(235):224-36.
  12. Kolbeck C, Behr M, Rosentritt M, Handel G. Fracture force of tooth-tooth- and implant-tooth-supported all-ceramic fixed partial dentures using titanium vs. customised zirconia implant abutments. Clin Oral Implants Res 2008;19:1049-53. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01551.x
  13. Stawarczyk B, Beuer F, Wimmer T, Jahn D, Sener B, Roos M, Schmidlin PR. Polyetheretherketone-a suitable material for fixed dental prostheses? J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2013;101:1209-16. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.32932
  14. Cantor R, Curtis TA. Prosthetic management of edentulous mandibulectomy patients. I. Anatomic, physiologic, and psychologic considerations. J Prosthet Dent 1971;25:446-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(71)90236-8
  15. Radke JC, Kamyszek GJ, Kull RS, Velasco GR. TMJ symptoms reduce chewing amplitude and velocity, and increase variability. Cranio 2019;37:12-9. https://doi.org/10.1080/08869634.2017.1365421
  16. Bathala L, Majeti V, Rachuri N, Singh N, Gedela S. The role of Polyether Ether Ketone (Peek) in dentistry - a review. J Med Life 2019;12:5-9. https://doi.org/10.25122/jml-2019-0003
  17. Parmigiani-Izquierdo JM, Cabana-Munoz ME, Merino JJ, Sanchez-Perez A. Zirconia implants and peek restorations for the replacement of upper molars. Int J Implant Dent 2017;3:5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40729-016-0062-2
  18. Real-Osuna J, Almendros-Marques N, Gay-Escoda C. Prevalence of complications after the oral rehabilitation with implant-supported hybrid prostheses. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2012;17:e116-21.
  19. Alqurashi H, Khurshid Z, Syed AUY, Rashid Habib S, Rokaya D, Zafar MS. Polyetherketoneketone (PEKK): An emerging biomaterial for oral implants and dental prostheses. J Adv Res 2020;28:87-95.