International Journal of Computer Science & Network Security

International Journal of Computer Science & Network Security (국제컴퓨터통신보호논문지학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Digitalization as a Means of Anti-Corruption Policy in the Sphere of Health Care in Ukraine

  • Received : 2022.07.05
  • Published : 2022.07.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The main purpose of the article is to determine the role of the digitalization phenomenon (its positive and negative sides) as a means of anti-corruption policy in the healthcare sector of Ukraine and provide practical recommendations for transforming the domestic healthcare sector based on digitalization through the implementation of organizational and legal measures. The definitions of such concepts as: corruption in the healthcare sector; digitalization; digitalization of the healthcare sector; e-medicine. A typology of reasons for promoting the development of corruption in the healthcare sector of modern Ukraine is given. As a result of the study, a number of scientific tasks were implemented. The negative side of the introduction of digitalization in the healthcare sector has been identified and illustrated. The types of e-services in the healthcare sector are systematized, each of them is characterized and the fundamental directions of their development are indicated. The existing problems of technostress are characterized (techno-overload; techno-invasion; techno-complexity; techno-insecurity; techno-uncertainty). In the context of considering digitalization as a means of anti-corruption policy in the healthcare sector, practical organizational and legal measures are proposed for implementation.

Keywords

References

  1. Quinn P. Crisis Communication in Public Health Emergencies: The Limits of 'Legal Control' and the Risks for Harmful Outcomes in a Digital Age. Life sciences, society and policy, 2018, 14(1), 4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40504-018-0067-0
  2. Puaschunder, J., Beerbaum, D. The Future of Healthcare around the World: Four Indices Integrating Technology, Productivity, Anti-Corruption, Healthcare and Market Financialization. SSRN Electronic Journal. 2020. https://doi.org/110.2139/ssrn.3662010
  3. Gaitonde R, Oxman AD, Okebukola PO, Rada G. Interventions to reduce corruption in the health sector. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Aug 16;(8). https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858
  4. Kohler, J., Dimancesco, D. The risk of corruption in public pharmaceutical procurement: how anti-corruption, transparency and accountability measures may reduce this risk. Glob Health Action. 2020;13(sup1):1694745. https://doi.org/10.1080/16549716.2019
  5. Okewu E., Okewu, J. E-government, e-Governance and e-Administration: A Typology of Corruption Management Using ICTs, in European Conference on e-Government, 2015, pp. 203-212.
  6. Mackey, T., Cuomo, R. An interdisciplinary review of digital technologies to facilitate anti-corruption, transparency and accountability in medicines procurement. Glob Health Action. 2020;13(sup1):1695241.https://doi.org/10.1080/16549716.2019.1695241
  7. Heeks R., Mathisen, H. Understanding success and failure of anti-corruption initiatives, Crime, Law Soc. Chang., 2019, vol. 58, no. 5, pp. 533-549, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-011-9361-y
  8. Hutchinson E, Naher N, Roy P, McKee M, Mayhew SH, Ahmed SM, Balabanova D. Targeting anticorruption interventions at the front line: developmental governance in health systems. BMJ Glob Health. 2020 Dec;5(12). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2020-003092
  9. Sommersguter-Reichmann M, Wild C, Stepan A, et al. Individual and institutional corruption in European and US healthcare: overview and link of various corruption typologies. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2018;16:1-24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40258-017-0345-7
  10. Kryshtanovych M., Gorban I., Kornat L., Dykyi A., Marushko N. Investment Support for the Digitalization of Socio-Economic Systems in the Context of Ensuring Security. IJCSNS. International Journal of Computer Science and Network Security. 2022. 22 , 6 , 733-738. https://doi.org/10.22937/IJCSNS.2022.22.6.92
  11. Huss, R., Green, A., Sudarshan, H., Karpagam, S, Ramani, K, Tomson, G., eGood governance and corruption in the health sector: lessons from the Karnataka experience. Health Policy and Planning. 2010;26(6):471-84. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czq080
  12. Vian, T. Anti-corruption, transparency and accountability in health: concepts, frameworks, and approaches. Glob Health Action. 2020;13(1):1694744.https://doi.org/10.1080/16549716.2019.1694744
  13. Kryshtanovych M., Antonova L., Pohrishchuk B., Mironova Y., Storozhev R. Information System of Anti-Crisis Management in the Context of Ensuring National Security.. IJCSNS International Journal of Computer Science and Network Security, 2021, 21,12, 719-725 https://doi.org/10.22937/IJCSNS.2021.21.12.98
  14. Wierzynska A, Steingruber S, Oroxom R, Bauhoff S. Recalibrating the anti-corruption, transparency, and accountability formula to advance public health. Glob Health Action. 2020;13(sup1):1701327.https://doi.org/10.1080/16549716.2019.1701327
  15. Kryshtanovych, M., Kotyk, T., Tiurina, T., Kovrei, D., & Dzhanda, H. Pedagogical and Psychological Aspects of the Implementation of Model of the Value Attitude to Health. BRAIN. Broad Research in Artificial Intelligence and Neuroscience, 2020 11(2Sup1), 127-138. https://doi.org/10.18662/brain/11.2Sup1/99