DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Impact of Philosophical Anthropology and Axiology on the Current Understanding of the Institution of Human Rights

  • Buglimova, Olga V. (Moscow City University) ;
  • Goncharov, Igor (North Caucasus Branch of the Russian State University of Justice) ;
  • Malinenko, Elvira (South Russian Institute of Management, Russian Academy of National Economy and Public Administration under the President of the Russian Federation) ;
  • Matveeva, Natalya (Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation) ;
  • Stepanenko, Yuri (Moscow State Law University named after O.E. Kutafina (Moscow State Law Academy)) ;
  • Chernichkina, Galina (Russian State University of Justice)
  • Received : 2022.07.05
  • Published : 2022.07.30

Abstract

The article aims at studying the institution of human rights in an ever-evolving world in the context of the interdisciplinary approach. The main scientific method was deduction that allowed examining the specific interdisciplinary approach in relation to the institution of human rights on the global scale. To solve the issue set, it is necessary to study legal foundations and features of the interdisciplinary approach to the institution of human rights in the modern world. The article proves there is no theoretical anthropological understanding of the institution of human rights. It has been concluded that the appeal to anthropological jurisprudence requires the identification of the initial theoretical and methodological principles, parameters and axioms of cognition, the integration of a person into the subject field of legal science, linking jurisprudence with the chosen external environment (philosophy, sociology, theology, etc.), predetermining the existence (understanding) of a person, causing qualitative differences and the structure of subject-methodological phenomena. In addition to the identification of such hypotheses, prerequisites and axioms, the basic method (principle) of cognition and its heuristic potential are also being searched (defined). The terminological designation of the formed subject-methodological phenomenon (legal anthropology, anthropology of law, anthropological approach, etc.) reveals its role in the system of interdisciplinary relations of legal science.

Keywords

References

  1. Alpatov, Yu. M., Grudtsyna, L. Yu.: Gumanisticheskie idei na liberalno-demokraticheskom etape genezisa pedagogicheskoi mysli i publitsistiki (posle 1920-kh gg.) [Humanistic ideas at the liberal and democratic stage of developing pedagogy and journalism (after the 1920s)]. Obrazovanie i Pravo, vol. 4, pp. 294-310 (2017).
  2. Alpatov, Yu. M., Grudtsyna, L. Yu., Molchanov, S. V.: Globalizatsiya i upravlenie natsionalnymi obrazovatelnymi sistemami [Globalization and management of national educational systems]. Obrazovanie i pravo. Obrazovanie i Pravo, vol. 7, pp. 202-208 (2017).
  3. Bachinin, V. A.: Filosofiya prava. Konspekt lektsii [The philosophy of law. The compendium of lectures]. Kharkov: Konsum (2002).
  4. Cacciaguidi-Fahy, S., Mooney, A.: The Promise of Legal Semiotics. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Semiotique Juridique, vol. 22(4), pp. 381-386 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-009-9123-7
  5. Kovkel, N. F.: Kriticheskii diskurs-analiz vlasti i prava: osnovnye problemy primeneniya [The critical discourse analysis of power and law: the main application issues]. In: Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference «Law and Power: Main Models of Interaction in a Multipolar World» (pp. 122-134). Voronezh (2017).
  6. Grudtsina, L. J.: Civil Society and Private Law. American Journal of Applied Sciences, vol. 11(11), pp. 1955-1958 (2014). https://doi.org/10.3844/ajassp.2014.1955.1958
  7. Chestnov, I. L.: Antropologicheskaya programma pravoprimeneniya [The anthropological program of law enforcement]. Trudy Instituta Gosudarstva i Prava RAN, vol. 4, pp. 87-101 (2016).
  8. Saidov, A. I.: Metodologicheskie problemy antropologii prava [Methodological issues of legal anthropology]. In: Proceedings of the IR International Round Table «Anthropology of Law» (pp. 247-259). Lvov (2013).
  9. Singer, P.: Practical Ethics Centre for Human Bioethics Monash University. New York: Cambridge University Press (1993).
  10. Lepti, B.: Obshchestvo kak edinoe tseloe. O trekh formakh analiza sotsialnoi tselostnosti [Society as a whole. About three forms of analyzing social integrity]. In: Gurevich, A. (Ed.), Odissei. Chelovek v istorii [Odysseus. Man in history]. Translated from French by Dubrovskii, I.V. (pp. 148-165). Moscow: Coda (1996).
  11. Tereshkovich, P. V.: Antropologiya [Anthropology]. In: Gritsanov, A. A. (Ed.), Noveishii filosofskii slovar [New Philosophical Dictionary]. The 3rd revised edition. Minsk: Knizhniy dom, pp. 51-52 (2003).
  12. Kevelson, R.: The Law as a System of Signs. New York, London: Plenum Press (1988).
  13. Kant, I.: Antropologiya s pragmaticheskoi tochki zreniya [Anthropology from a pragmatic point of view]. Saint Petersburg: Nauka (1999).
  14. Russian Humanist Society: Deklaratsiya sekulyarnogo gumanizma [The declaration of secular humanism] (2022). http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:h_mTKYCxm3kJ:www.humanism.ru/documents/75-declaration.html+&cd=3&hl=ru&ct=clnk&gl=ru
  15. Centre for Human Technologies: Gumanisticheskii manifest 2000. Prizyv k novomu planetarnomu gumanizmu [Humanist manifesto 2000. A call for a new planetary humanism] (2000). https://gtmarket.ru/library/basis/5469/5473
  16. Balkin, J. M.: The Promise of Legal Semiotics. University of Texas Law Review, vol. 69, pp. 1831-1852 (1991).
  17. Wagner, A., Broekman, J. M.: Promises and Prospects of Legal Semiotics - An Introduction. In: Prospects of Legal Semiotics (pp. 5-17). Springer (2011).
  18. Grudtsina, L. J.: Role of civil society, mechanisms of future development and regulation. World Applied Sciences Journal, vol. 31(3), pp. 294-297 (2014). https://doi.org/10.5829/idosi.wasj.2014.31.03.335
  19. Malinenko, E. V.: Pravovoe polozhenie cheloveka i grazhdanina: problemy teorii i praktiki [The legal status of a person and civilian: theoretical and practical issues]. Agrarnoe i Zemelnoe Parvo, vol. 4(160), pp. 19-23 (2018).