DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Lactic acid bacteria strains selected from fermented total mixed rations improve ensiling and in vitro rumen fermentation characteristics of corn stover silage

  • Huang, Kailang (Institute of Dairy Science, College of Animal Sciences, Zhejiang University) ;
  • Chen, Hongwei (Institute of Dairy Science, College of Animal Sciences, Zhejiang University) ;
  • Liu, Yalu (Institute of Dairy Science, College of Animal Sciences, Zhejiang University) ;
  • Hong, Qihua (The Experimental Teaching Center, College of Animal Sciences, Zhejiang University) ;
  • Yang, Bin (Institute of Dairy Science, College of Animal Sciences, Zhejiang University) ;
  • Wang, Jiakun (Institute of Dairy Science, College of Animal Sciences, Zhejiang University)
  • 투고 : 2021.10.09
  • 심사 : 2021.12.30
  • 발행 : 2022.09.01

초록

Objective: This study identified the major lactic acid bacteria (LAB) strains from different fermented total mixed rations (FTMRs) via metataxonomic analysis and evaluated the ability of their standard strain as ensiling inoculants for corn stover silage. Methods: The bacterial composition of eight FTMRs were analyzed by 16S rDNA sequencing. Corn stover was ensiled without LAB inoculation (control) or with 1×106 cfu/g LAB standard strain (Lactobacillus vaginalis, Lactobacillus reuteri, Lactobacillus helveticus, or Lactobacillus paralimentarius) selected from the FTMRs or 10 g/t commercial silage inoculant (CSI) around 25℃ for 56 days. For each inoculation, a portion of the silage was sampled to analyze ensiling characteristics at time intervals of 0, 1, 3, 7, 14, 28, and 56 days, gas production (GP), microbial crude protein and volatile fatty acids as the measurements of rumen fermentation characteristics were evaluated in vitro with the silages of 56 days after 72 h incubation. Results: Lactobacillus covered >85% relative abundance of all FTMRs, in which L. pontis, L. vaginalis, L. reuteri, L. helveticus, and L. paralimentarius showed >4% in specific FTMRs. CSI, L. helveticus, and L. paralimentarius accelerated the decline of silage pH. Silage inoculated with L. paralimentarius and CSI produced more lactic acid the early 14 days. Silage inoculated with L. paralimentarius produced less acetic acid and butyric acid. For the in vitro rumen fermentation, silage inoculated with CSI produced more potential GP, isobutyric acid, and isovaleric acid; silage inoculated with L. helveticus produced more potential GP and isovaleric acid, silage inoculated with L. paralimentarius or L. reuteri produced more potential GP only. Conclusion: The standard strain L. paralimentarius (DSM 13238) is a promising ensiling inoculant for corn stover silage. The findings provide clues on strategies to select LAB to improve the quality of silage.

키워드

과제정보

We would also like to thank the members of the Experimental Teaching Center, College of Animal Sciences, Zhejiang University, China for their assistance. This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (Award number: 2018YFD0501903) and Higher Education "13th Five-Year" Teaching Reform Research Project, Zhejiang University (Grant number: Zdjg08009), China.

참고문헌

  1. Muck RE, Nadeau EMG, McAllister TA, Contreras-Govea FE, Santos MC, Kung L, Jr. Silage review: Recent advances and future uses of silage additives. J Dairy Sci 2018;101:3980-4000. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2017-13839
  2. Yang J, Cao Y, Cai Y, Terada F. Natural populations of lactic acid bacteria isolated from vegetable residues and silage fermentation. J Dairy Sci 2010;93:3136-45. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2009-2898
  3. Lynch JP, O'Kiely P, Waters SM, Doyle EM. Conservation characteristics of corn ears and stover ensiled with the addition of Lactobacillus plantarum MTD-1, Lactobacillus plantarum 30114, or Lactobacillus buchneri 11A44. J Dairy Sci 2012;95:2070-80. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2011-5013
  4. Cai Y, Benno Y, Ogawa M, Kumai S. Effect of applying lactic acid bacteria isolated from forage crops on fermentation characteristics and aerobic deterioration of silage. J Dairy Sci 1999;82:520-6. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(99)75263-X
  5. Li D, Wang Y, Zhang Y, Lin Y, Yang F. Evaluation of lactic acid bacteria isolated from alfalfa for silage fermentation. Grassl Sci 2018;64:190-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/grs.12198
  6. Zhang Q, Yu Z, Wang X. Isolating and evaluating lactic acid bacteria strains with or without sucrose for effectiveness of silage fermentation. Grassl Sci 2015;61:167-76. https://doi.org/10.1111/grs.12097
  7. Cai Y, Pang H, Kitahara M, Ohkuma M. Lactobacillus nasuensis sp. nov., a lactic acid bacterium isolated from silage, and emended description of the genus Lactobacillus. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2012;62:1140-4. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.031781-0
  8. Guan H, Ke W, Yan Y, et al. Screening of natural lactic acid bacteria with potential effect on silage fermentation, aerobic stability and aflatoxin B1 in hot and humid area. J Appl Microbiol 2020;128:1301-11. https://doi.org/10.1111/jam.14570
  9. Wang S, Yuan X, Dong Z, Li J, Shao T. Characteristics of lactic acid bacteria isolated from different sources and their effects on the silage quality of oat (Avena sativa L.) straw on the Tibetan Plateau. Grassl Sci 2018;64:128-36. https://doi.org/10.1111/grs.12191
  10. Amaral RC, Carvalho BF, Costa DM, Morenz MJF, Schwan RF, vila CLdS. Novel lactic acid bacteria strains enhance the conservation of elephant grass silage cv. BRS Capiacu. Anim Feed Sci Technol 2020;264:114472. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2020.114472
  11. Ding ZT, Xu DM, Bai J, et al. Characterization and identification of ferulic acid esterase-producing Lactobacillus species isolated from Elymus nutans silage and their application in ensiled alfalfa. J Appl Microbiol 2019;127:985-95. https://doi.org/10.1111/jam.14374
  12. Gagen EJ, Denman SE, Padmanabha J, et al. Functional gene analysis suggests different acetogen populations in the bovine rumen and tammar wallaby forestomach. Appl Environ Microbiol 2010;76:7785-95. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.01679-10
  13. Schloss PD, Westcott SL, Ryabin T, et al. Introducing mothur: open-source, platform-independent, community-supported software for describing and comparing microbial communities. Appl Environ Microbiol 2009;75:7537-41. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.01541-09
  14. Edgar RC, Haas BJ, Clemente JC, Quince C, Knight R. UCHIME improves sensitivity and speed of chimera detection. Bioinformatics 2011;27:2194-200. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btr381
  15. DeSantis TZ, Hugenholtz P, Larsen N, et al. Greengenes, a chimera-checked 16S rRNA gene database and workbench compatible with ARB. Appl Environ Microbiol 2006;72:5069-72. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.03006-05
  16. Dubois M, Gilles KA, Hamilton JK, Rebers PA, Smith F. Colorimetric method for determination of sugars and related substances. Anal Chem 1956;28:350-6. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac60111a017
  17. Sun Z, Harris HM, McCann A, et al. Expanding the biotechnology potential of lactobacilli through comparative genomics of 213 strains and associated genera. Nat Commun 2015;6: 8322. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms9322
  18. Chaney AL, Marbach EP. Modified reagents for determination of urea and ammonia. Clin Chem 1962;8:130-2. https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/8.2.130
  19. Menke KH, Raab L, Salewski A, Steingass H, Fritz D, Schneider W. The estimation of the digestibility and metabolizable energy content of ruminant feedingstuffs from the gas production when they are incubated with rumen liquor in vitro. J Agric Sci-Cambridge 1979;93:217-22. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859600086305
  20. Mi L, Yang B, Hu X, et al. Comparative analysis of the microbiota between sheep rumen and rabbit cecum provides new insight into their differential methane production. Front Microbiol 2018;9:575. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.00575
  21. Contreras-Govea FE, Muck RE, Mertens DR, Weimer PJ. Microbial inoculant effects on silage and in vitro ruminal fermentation, and microbial biomass estimation for alfalfa, bmr corn, and corn silages. Anim Feed Sci Technol 2011;163: 2-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2010.09.015
  22. Guan H, Yan Y, Li X, et al. Microbial communities and natural fermentation of corn silages prepared with farm bunkersilo in Southwest China. Bioresour Technol 2018;265:282-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2018.06.018
  23. Yan Y, Li X, Guan H, et al. Microbial community and fermentation characteristic of Italian ryegrass silage prepared with corn stover and lactic acid bacteria. Bioresour Technol 2019;279:166-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2019.01.107
  24. Ren H, Feng Y, Pei J, et al. Effects of Lactobacillus plantarum additive and temperature on the ensiling quality and microbial community dynamics of cauliflower leaf silages. Bioresour Technol 2020;307:123238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2020.123238
  25. Yang F, Wang Y, Zhao S, Wang Y. Lactobacillus plantarum inoculants delay spoilage of high moisture alfalfa silages by regulating bacterial community composition. Front Microbiol 2020;11:1989. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2020.01989
  26. Carvalho BF, Sales GFC, Schwan RF, Avila CLS. Criteria for lactic acid bacteria screening to enhance silage quality. J Appl Microbiol 2021;130:341-55. https://doi.org/10.1111/jam.14833
  27. McCullough M. Feeding quality silage. Animal Nutrition and Health; 1984. pp. 30-5.
  28. Xu D, Ding W, Ke W, Li F, Zhang P, Guo X. Modulation of metabolome and bacterial community in whole crop corn silage by inoculating homofermentative Lactobacillus plantarum and heterofermentative Lactobacillus buchneri. Front Microbiol 2019;9:3299. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.03299
  29. Guo L, Yao D, Li D, et al. Effects of lactic acid bacteria isolated from rumen fluid and feces of dairy cows on fermentation quality, microbial community, and in vitro digestibility of alfalfa silage. Front Microbiol 2020;10:2998. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2019.02998
  30. da Silva NC, Nascimento CF, Nascimento FA, de Resende FD, Daniel JLP, Siqueira GR. Fermentation and aerobic stability of rehydrated corn grain silage treated with different doses of Lactobacillus buchneri or a combination of Lactobacillus plantarum and Pediococcus acidilactici. J Dairy Sci 2018; 101:4158-67. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2017-13797