Animal Bioscience

Asian Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies (아세아태평양축산학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Genetic parameters of milk and lactation curve traits of dairy cattle from research farms in Thailand

  • Pangmao, Santi (Sydney School of Veterinary Science, Faculty of Science, The University of Sydney) ;
  • Thomson, Peter C. (Sydney School of Veterinary Science, Faculty of Science, The University of Sydney) ;
  • Khatkar, Mehar S. (Sydney School of Veterinary Science, Faculty of Science, The University of Sydney)
  • Received : 2021.12.17
  • Accepted : 2022.04.11
  • Published : 2022.10.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Objective: This study was aimed to estimate the genetic parameters, including genetic and phenotypic correlations, of milk yield, lactation curve traits and milk composition of Thai dairy cattle from three government research farms. Methods: The data of 25,789 test-day milk yield and milk composition records of 1,468 cattle from lactation 1 to 3 of Holstein Friesian (HF) and crossbred HF dairy cattle calved between 1990 and 2015 from three government research farms in Thailand were analysed. 305-day milk yield was estimated by the Wood model and a test interval method. The Wood model was used for estimating cumulative 305-day milk yield, peak milk yield, days to peak milk yield and persistency. Genetic parameters were estimated using linear mixed models with herd, breed group, year and season of calving as fixed effects, and animals linked to a pedigree as random effects, together with a residual error. Univariate models were used to estimate variance components, heritability, estimated breeding values (EBVs) and repeatability of each trait, while pairwise bivariate models were used to estimate covariance components and correlations between traits in the same lactation and in the same trait across lactations. Results: The heritability of 305-day milk yield, peak milk yield and protein percentage have moderate to high estimates ranging from 0.19 to 0.45 while days to peak milk yield, persistency and fat percentage have low heritability ranging from 0.08 to 0.14 in lactation 1 cows. Further, heritability of most traits considered was higher in lactation 1 compared with lactations 2 and 3. For cows in lactation 1, high genetic correlations were found between 305-day milk yield and peak milk yield (0.86±0.07) and days to peak milk yield and persistency (0.99±0.02) while estimates of genetic correlations between the remaining traits were imprecise due to the high standard errors. The genetic correlations within the traits across lactation were high. There was no consistent trend of EBVs for most traits in the first lactation over the study period. Conclusion: Both the Wood model and test interval method can be used for milk yield estimates in these herds. However, the Wood model has advantages over the test interval method as it can be fitted using fewer test-day records and the estimated model parameters can be used to derive estimates of other lactation curve parameters. Milk yield, peak milk yield and protein percentage can be improved by a selection and mating program while days to peak milk yield, persistency and fat percentage can be improved by including into a selection index.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

The data for this work were provided by the Department of Livestock Development, Thailand. We would like to sincerely thank the Royal Thai Government Scholarships for SP's PhD studies.

References

  1. Office of Agricultural Economics. Agricultural statistics of Thailand 2018 [Internet]. c2018 [cited 2019 April 8]. Available from: http://www.oae.go.th/assets/portals/1/files/jounal/2562/yearbook2561.pdf
  2. Pangmao S, Thomson PC, Khatkar MS. Dairy cattle industry and genetic improvement programs in Thailand. Anim Prod Sci 2017;57:1242-7. https://doi.org/10.1071/AN16454
  3. ICAR. International Committee for Animal Recording [Internet]. c2019 [2019 April 8]. Available from: https://www.icar. org/index.php/icar-recording-guidelines/
  4. Wood PDP. Algebraic model of the lactation curve in cattle. Nature 1967;216:164-5. https://doi.org/10.1038/216164a0
  5. Dijkstra J, Lopez S, Bannink A, et al. Evaluation of a mechanistic lactation model using cow, goat and sheep data. J Agric Sci 2010;148:249-62. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859609990578
  6. McGill DM, Thomson PC, Mulder HA, Lievaart JJ. Modification of lactation yield estimates for improved selection outcomes in developing dairy sectors. Proc Assoc Advmt Anim Breed Genet 2013;20:74-7.
  7. Thai Meteorological Department. The climate of Thailand [Internet]. c2015 [cited 2016 Feb 25]. Available from: http://www.tmd.go.th/en/archive/thailand_climate.pdf
  8. Hall EJS. Statistical modelling of lactation curves in Australian dairy cattle [PhD Thesis]. Sydney, Australia: University of Sydney; 2008.
  9. Pinheiro J, Bates D, DebRoy S, Sarkar D, R Core Team. nlme: Linear and nonlinear mixed effects models. R package version 3.1-137. Available from: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=nlme; 2018
  10. Sargent FD, Lytton VH, Wall OG, Jr. Test interval method of calculating dairy herd improvement association records. J Dairy Sci 1968;51:170-9. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(68)86943-7
  11. Butler DG, Cullis BR, Gilmour AR, Gogel BJ. ASReml-R reference manual. Brisbane, Australia: Queensland Department of Primary Industries and Fisheries; 2009.
  12. McGill DM, Thomson PC, Mulder HA, Lievaart JJ. Strategic test-day recording regimes to estimate lactation yield in tropical dairy animals. Genet Sel Evol 2014;46:78. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12711-014-0078-0
  13. Hossein-Zadeh NG. Comparison of non-linear models to describe the lactation curves of milk yield and composition in Iranian Holsteins. J Agric Sci 2014;152:309-24. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859613000415
  14. Gengler N. Persistency of lactation yields: a review. Interbull Bulletin 1996;12:87-96.
  15. Hammami H, Rekik B, Soyeurt H, Ben Gara A, Gengler N. Genetic parameters for tunisian holsteins using a test-day random regression model. J Dairy Sci 2008;91:2118-26. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2007-0382
  16. Mohammed E, Tumwasorn S, Sopannarath P, Prasanpanich S. Genotype by region interaction on milk production traits of Holstein crossbred dairy cows in Thailand. Agric Nat Res 2013;47:228-37.
  17. Boonkum W, Duangjinda M. Estimation of genetic parameters for heat stress, including dominance gene effects, on milk yield in Thai Holstein dairy cattle. Anim Sci J 2015;86:245-50. https://doi.org/10.1111/asj.12276
  18. Konig S, Chongkasikit N, Langholz HJ. Estimation of variance components for production and fertility traits in Northern Thai dairy cattle to define optimal breeding strategies. Arch Anim Breed 2005;48:233-46. https://doi.org/10.5194/aab-48-233-2005
  19. Seangjun A, Koonawootrittriron S, Elzo MA. Characterization of lactation patterns and milk yield in a multibreed dairy cattle population in the Central Thailand. Agric Nat Res 2009;43:74-82.
  20. Sarakul M, Koonawootrittriron S, Elzo M, Suwanasopee T. Factors influencing genetic change for milk yield within farms in central Thailand. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci 2011;24: 1031-40. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2011.10401
  21. Chegini A, Shadparvar AA, Ghavi Hossein-Zadeh N. Genetic parameter estimates for lactation curve parameters, milk yield, age at first calving, calving interval and somatic cell count in Holstein cows. Iran J Appl Anim Sci 2015;5:61-7.
  22. Welper RD, Freeman AE. Genetic parameters for yield traits of Holsteins, including lactose and somatic cell score. J Dairy Sci 1992;75:1342-8. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(92)77885-0
  23. Boujenane I. Estimates of genetic and phenotypic parameters for milk production in moroccan Holstein-Friesian cows. Rev Elev Med Vet Pays Trop 2002;55:63-7. https://doi.org/10.19182/remvt.9848
  24. Harris Bl, Pryce JE. Genetic and phenotypic relationships between milk protein percentage, reproductive performance and body condition score in New Zealand dairy cattle. Proceedings of the New Zealand Society of Animal Production 2004;64:127-31.
  25. Kim BW, Lee D, Jeon JT, Lee JG. Estimation of genetic parameters for milk production traits using a random regression test-day model in Holstein cows in Korea. AsianAustralas J Anim Sci 2009;22:923-30. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2009.80110
  26. Koonawootrittriron S, Elzo MA, Thongprapi T. Genetic trends in a Holstein x other breeds multibreed dairy population in Central Thailand. Livest Sci 2009;122:186-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2008.08.013
  27. Boujenane I, Hilal B. Genetic and non genetic effects for lactation curve traits in Holstein-Friesian cows. Arch Anim Breed 2012;55:450-7. https://doi.org/10.5194/aab-55-450-2012
  28. Gebreyohannes G, Koonawootrittriron S, Elzo MA, Suwanasopee T. Variance components and genetic parameters for milk production and lactation pattern in an Ethiopian multibreed dairy cattle population. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci 2013;26:1237-46. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2013.13040
  29. Saghanezhad F, Atashi H, Dadpasand M, Zamiri MJ, ShokriSangari F. Estimation of genetic parameters for lactation curve traits in Holstein dairy cows in Iran. Iran J Appl Anim Sci 2017;7:559-66.
  30. Van Der Werf JHJ, De Boer W. Estimation of genetic parameters in a crossbred population of Black and White dairy cattle. J Dairy Sci 1989;72:2615-23. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(89)79402-9