DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Analysis of the Effects of Job Policy Measures in Korea: Do the job policy measures impact the marriage and fertility of the youth in Korea?

  • Received : 2022.05.02
  • Accepted : 2022.08.08
  • Published : 2022.08.31

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to analyze the effects of youth job policy measures, set forth in Korea's 2016-2020 Third Basic Plan for Low Fertility and Aging Society (December 2015), on marriage and fertility among young people. Based on the results, we provide theoretical explanations for the findings and suggest policy alternatives to overcome the low fertility phenomenon in Korea. Previous studies have shown that employment is an important factor for marriage among youth, and a job policy could increase marriage and fertility rates. To test this assumption, we performed an exact matching between Statistics Korea's Employee-Enterprise Linkage DB and the Newlyweds DB from 2011 to 2019, in order to identify all young people aged 15-34. Then, linear spline regression analysis was used to examine the impact of the youth job policy on marriage and fertility. Comparing the period before the implementation of the employment policy (2011-2015) and after (2016-2019), the fertility rate increased as the number of young people looking for work increased. In addition, it was found that these impacts were greater after the implementation of the measures (2016-2019) than before (2011-2015). It is interesting to note that job growth among young people did not lead to an increase in marriage. However, the number of births significantly increased when young people who occupy jobs got married, which seems to be related to the delay in marriage among young people who are employed. Survey results about the intentions to marry and views on fertility are utilized for the explanation of the study results.

Keywords

References

  1. Ang, X.L. (2015). The effects of cash transfer fertility incentives and parental leave benefits on fertility and labor supply: Evidence from two natural experiments. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 36(2), 263-288. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10834-014-9394-3
  2. Boca, D. (2002). The effect of child care and part time opportunities on participation and fertility decisions in Italy. Journal of Population Economic, 15(3), 549-573. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20007829 https://doi.org/10.1007/s001480100089
  3. Cho, S.K., Jun, K.H., Kye, B., Hwang, S.J., Jang, D.H. & Lee, K.O. (2019). Hangugsahoegwahagjosa 2019nyeon 1chajosabogoseo [The Korean Academic Multimode Open Survey, 1st Survey Report]. http://cnukamos.com/kor/sub3/menu_1.php
  4. Choi, B.H., Lee, C.W. (2017). Daehanmingug gwang-yeogjibangjachidanche chulsanjanglyeo peulogeulaem-ui hyogwaseong-e gwanhan siljeungjeog yeongu [An empirical study on the effectiveness of birth encouragement programs of local governments in South Korea]. Social Economy & Policy Studies, 7(1), 187-213. https://doi.org/10.22340/seps.2017.02.7.1.187
  5. Choi, S. (2015). Hangugsahoeui ingubyeonhwawa sahoemunje: ingubyeondongyoingwa ingusu/ingugujoleul jungsim-eulo [Demographic change and social problems in South Korea: Based on population/demographic structure and determinants of population change]. Economy and Society, 106, 14-40. https://doi.org/10.18207/criso.2015.106.14
  6. Chu, H., Kim, M.S. (2018). Cheongnyeoncheung-ui gyeolhon ihaeng yeobue daehan gyeongjejeog baegyeong yoin-ui yeonghyang [The impact of socioeconomic backgrounds on marriage event]. Social Economy & Policy Studies, 8(2), 59-88. https://doi.org/10.22340/seps.2018.06.8.2.59
  7. Eom, D.W. (2009). Daehanmingug-eun jeochulsanhamjeong-e ppajin geos-inga?-jeochulsanhamjeong gaseol-ui geomjeung-gwa ham-ui [Does Korea fall into the low fertility trap?-A test of the low fertility trap hypothesis-]. Korea Journal of Population Studies, 32(2), 141-159. G704-000152.2009.32.2.004
  8. Francesconi, M., Klaauw, W. (2007). The socioeconomic consequences of 'in-work' benefit reform for British lone mothers. The Journal of Human Resources, 42(1), 1-31. https://doi.org/10.3368/jhr.XLII.1.1
  9. Gauthier, A.H., Hatzius, J. (1997). Family benefits and fertility: An econometric analysis. Population Studies: Journal of Demography, 51(3), 295-306. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2952473 https://doi.org/10.1080/0032472031000150066
  10. Government of the Republic of Korea (2006). 2006-2010 je1cha jeochulsan golyeongsahoe gibongyehoeg [First Basic Plan for Low Fertility and Aging Society]. https://www.korea.kr/archive/expDocView.do?docId=22496
  11. Government of the Republic of Korea (2010). 2011-2015 je2cha jeochulsan golyeongsahoe gibongyehoeg [Second Basic Plan for Low Fertility and Aging Society]. https://www.korea.kr/archive/expDocView.do?docId=36599
  12. Government of the Republic of Korea (2015). 2016-2020 je3cha jeochulsan golyeongsahoe gibongyehoeg [Third Basic Plan for Low Fertility and Aging Society]. https://www.korea.kr/archive/expDocView.do?docId=36928
  13. Higuchi, Y. (1996). An empirical study of childcare leave in Japan: Marriage, childbirth and job retention. Keio Business Review, 33, 33-51.
  14. James, G., Witten, D., Hastie, T. & Tibshirani, R. (2013). An Introduction to Statistical Learning. Springer. https://www.statlearning.com
  15. JoongAng Daily. (2017, October 24) Lagaleudeu IMF chongjae "hangug, jibdan jasalsahoe" hantanhan kkadalg [IMF's lagarde expressed worries about South Korea's glass ceiling]. http://Joongang.co.kr/article/22043679#home
  16. Jung, C., Kim, D., Kim, S., Choi, J. & Kim, H. (2019). Milae daehanmingug-ui jeochulsangwa iljalie sumgyeojin pideubaeg lupeuwa sinalio [The hidden feedback loop and scenario on future of Korea's low fertility and jobs]. https://www.nafi.re.kr/new/research.do?mode=view&articleNo=2499&article.offset=10&articleLimit=10&srSearchVal=%EC%B6%9C%EC%82%B0
  17. Kalwij, A. (2010). The impact of family policy expenditure on fertility in Western Europe. Demography, 47(2), 503-519. https://doi.org/10.1353/dem.0.0104
  18. Kim, C.S. (2006). Mihonnamnyeoui gyeolhon uihyang bigyobunseog [Marriage intention among never-married men and women in Korea]. Korea Journal of Population Studies, 29(1), 57-70. G704-000152.2006.29.1.006
  19. Kim, D.H., Chung, C.K. & Kim, S.B. (2019). Jeochulsan jeongchaeggwa iljali jeongchaeg-ui yeongyeol-eul tonghae deuleonaneun pideubaeg lupeu [Emerging feedback loops through connecting the population policy and the employment policy], Korean System Dynamics Review, 20(4), 5-43. https://doi.org/10.32588/ksds.20.4.2
  20. Kim, J. (2013). Mihonnamnyeoui gyeolhon-uihyang chaie michineun jojeolbyeonsuui yeongu [The study of moderating effects upon gender differences in attitudes toward marriage]. Journal of Social Science, 39(1), 167-189. https://kiss.kstudy.com/thesis/thesis-view.asp?key=3140650 https://doi.org/10.15820/KHJSS.2013.39.1.008
  21. Kim, Y. (2016). Jeochulsangwa cheongnyeon iljali [Low fertility and youth jobs]. Korea Labour & Society Institute, 8, 1-19. http://klsi.org/bbs/board.php?bo_table=B03&wr_id=2473
  22. Kravdal, O. (1996). How the local supply of day-care centers influences fertility in Norway: A parity-specific approach. Population Research and Policy Review, 15(3), 201-218. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40230098 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00127049
  23. Lappegard, T. (2010). Family policies and fertility in Norway. European Journal of Population, 26(1), 99-116. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10680-009-9190-1
  24. Lee, S., Lee, C. & Hong, S.C. (2016). Jeochulsan daechaeg-ui hyogwaseong pyeong-ga [Impact evaluation of Korea's pro-natal policies]. Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs Research Paper, 2016-44-08. http://repository.kihasa.re.kr/handle/201002/21232
  25. Milligan, K. (2005). Subsidizing the stork: New evidence on tax incentives and fertility. The Review of Economic and Statistics, 87(3), 539-555. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40042947 https://doi.org/10.1162/0034653054638382
  26. Oh, J., Lim, J. (2016). Hangug mihon namnyeoui gyeolhon sigiwa gyeolhon ganeungseong-e gwanhan yeongu [The timing and possibility of marriage among single men and women in Korea]. Korean Journal of Sociology, 50(5), 203-245. https://doi.org/10.21562/kjs.2016.10.50.5.203
  27. Presidential Committee on Ageing Society and Population Policy. (2020). 2021-2025 Fourth Basic Plan for Low Fertility and Aging Society. https://www.betterfuture.go.kr/front/notificationSpace/pressReleaseDetail.do?articleId=117
  28. Statistics Korea. Newly Weds Statistics. https://kosis.kr
  29. Statistics Korea. Administrative Statistics on Jobs. https://kosis.kr
  30. Statistics Korea. Vital Statistics - Births. Marriages Statistics. https://kosis.kr
  31. Statistics Korea. Population projections: 2000-2050. https://kosis.kr
  32. Statistics Korea. kosis.kr. Population projections: 2017-2067. https://kosis.kr
  33. Statistics Korea. 2020 Population Census Sample (20%) - Population Characteristics (Women, Fertility, Children, Migration, Commuting to Workplaces and Schools). https://kosis.kr
  34. Suk, H. (2011). Chulsanjanglyeogeum jeongchaeg-ui hyogwaseong-e gwanhan yeongu: seoulteugbyeolsileul jungsim-eulo [Study on the impact of maternity subsidies policy: Focusing on local governments in Seoul Metropolis]. The Korea Local Administration Review, 25(2), 143-180. https://doi.org/10.22783/krila.2011.25.2.143
  35. Vedung, E. (2003). Models of evaluation. In P. Haug & T.A. Schwandt (Eds). Evaluating Educational Reforms: Scandinavian Perspectives, 41-71. IAP (Information Age Publishing). https://www.infoagepub.com
  36. Whittington, L., Alm, J. & Elizabeth, H. (1990). Fertility and the personal exemption: Implicit pronatalist policy in the United States. The American Economic Review, 80(3), 545-556. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2006683
  37. Yoo, J. (2016). Chwieob-i gyeolhon-e michineun yeonghyang-gwa nodongsijanggaehyeog-e daehan sisajeom [Insights on the effects of employment on marriage and labor market reform], KERIS Economic Quarterly, 16(15), 1-34. http://www.keri.org/web/www/research_0201
  38. Zhang, J., Quan, J. & Meerbergen, P. (1994). The effect of tax-transfer policies on fertility in Canada, 1921-88. The Journal of Human Resources, 29(1), 181-201. https://doi.org/10.2307/146061