DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

제로에너지건축물 인증제도의 활성화를 위한 설계자와 시공자의 중요도 비교분석

Important Factors for Designers and Builders in Activating Zero-Energy Building Certification

  • 박정로 ((주)케이스종합건축사사무소 기업부설연구소) ;
  • 최재규 (동서울대 건축학과)
  • 투고 : 2022.05.23
  • 심사 : 2022.07.12
  • 발행 : 2022.08.30

초록

The importance of activating zero-energy building certification was analyzed for designers and builders. A comparative analysis was conducted to reveal what designers and builders deemed important as it pertained to policy, technology, education, incentives, and promotion. For designers, policy items were found to value energy expert training and the office registration system. For contractors, items on technology were more important than policies and they placed value on the maintenance of the design system. Important factors for both designers and builders regarding the technology items involved the development of various residential and non-residential standard models and design consulting support. As for the education items, both designers and contractors saw insulation, confidential education, and conceptual education as important factors for activation. For the incentive items, both groups viewed incentives for easing the floor area ratio and building height standard as an important factor for activation. Lastly, for the promotion items, both designers and contractors selected promotions for builders or ordering customers as the most important activation factor. Through this study, it is expected that the direction of policy definition factoring practitioners can contribute to the preparation process of revitalizing the certification of zero-energy buildings.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Choi, J. K., Shin, M. S., & Lee, D. O. (2020). A survey on capability and effectiveness of the building energy assessor, Journal of Korea Institute of Ecological Architecture and Environment, 20(6), 139-146.
  2. Jeong, Y. S., Cho, S. H., Mun, S. H., & Ji, C. Y. (2021). Scenario to reduce greenhouse gas emissions in building sector towards the goal of carbon neutrality by 2050, Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea, 37(10), 189-197. https://doi.org/10.5659/JAIK.2021.37.10.189
  3. Kim, M. Y., Kim, H. G., & Hong, G. P. (2018). Design factors and initial cost by zero energy building rating systems through case study, Journal of Korea Institute of Ecological Architecture and Environment, 18(2), 55-60.
  4. Kim, S. S., & Jin, T. S. (2018). An institutional study for the activation of zero energy building, AURI report
  5. Lee, D. H., & Byun, S. Y. (2021). A study on the selection of the optimal region of data center considering zero energy building certification, Journal of Korean Institute of Architectural Sustainable Environment and Building Systems, 15(4), 375-385.
  6. Lee, M. J., & Kim, J. U. (2015). A study of domestic and foreign system and evaluate tools relative to building energy performance analysis and improvement plan for zero energy building design, Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea, 31(4), 45-52.
  7. Lee, S. M., Kim, J. H., Shin, G. S., & Kim, E. J. (2018). Market acceptability of the ZEB certification system for public buildings according to the 2025 roadmap, Journal of Korean Institute of Architectural Sustainable Environment and Building Systems, 12(6), 557-566.
  8. Shin, J. W., Yun, J. H., & Ko, J. L. (2019). A study on the optimization of photovoltaic system for the ZEB certification in detached housing, Journal of the Korean Solar Energy Society, 39(3), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.7836/kses.2019.39.3.001
  9. Zero Energy Building Certification System, Retrieved March 10, 2022 from https://zeb.energy.or.kr/