대한건축학회논문집 (Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea)

  • 제38권8호
  • /
  • Pages.71-81
  • /
  • 2022
  • /
  • 2733-6239(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2733-6247(eISSN)
대한건축학회 (Architectural Institute of Korea)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

특수목 조경 설계 검토 단계에서의 혼합현실 도입 가능성에 관한 연구

Introduction of Mixed Reality on Special Tree Landscape Design Review Phase

  • 임진빈 (한양대학교 건축공학과) ;
  • 황서준 (한양대학교 건설관리학과) ;
  • 장재호 (한양대학교 건축공학과) ;
  • 김주형 (한양대학교 건축공학과) ;
  • 이경태 (한양대학교 건축공학과)
  • Im, Jin-Bin (Dept. of Architectural Engineering, Hanyang University) ;
  • Hwang, Seo-Joon (Dept. of Construction Management Hanyang University) ;
  • Jang, Jae-Ho (Dept. of Architectural Engineering, Hanyang University) ;
  • Kim, Ju-Hyung (Dept. of Architectural Engineering, Hanyang University) ;
  • Lee, Kyung-Tae (Dept. of Architectural Engineering, Hanyang University)
  • 투고 : 2022.04.01
  • 심사 : 2022.08.01
  • 발행 : 2022.08.30
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Information asymmetry is the biggest reason for variations and change orders in the field of construction. These issues lead to increased construction period and cost, legal claims, and disputes. Especially, the design of a special tree is difficult for clients to perceive the description of the tree due to the limited experience and information. Consequently, designers have used representation tools such as 2D CAD or BIM to make their proposals easier for clients to understand more intuitive. However, existing representation tools require professional knowledge and the ability to imagine or shape the information, which intensifies difficulties in communication between practitioners and clients. Thus, more immersive realistic models in virtual-reality or mixed-reality environments are applied in the design review process to support decision-making. In this study, the mixed reality was introduced to determine whether it could be used as a representation tool while supporting the client's special tree design decision-making. To verify this hypothesis, an experiment, about the installation of a special tree in the landscape design review phase, was conducted to compare mixed reality with the 2D CAD drawing plans, which is the representative design proposal representation. In addition, 12 questionnaires are classified by each category, understanding of space, understanding of greenery, and decision-making supporting. Mann-Whitney U test and paired t-test were conducted to analyze the significance between previous representation tools and mixed-reality about the understanding of space, design, and greenery. In addition, the correlation between understanding and decision-making support for landscape design review was analyzed by applying the Pearson correlation coefficient. As a result, it was found that mixed-reality is more intuitive and easier than 2D CAD drawings to understand essential information such as spatial, design, and scale information in the design review phase of a special tree. Even with the technical limitations of tactility visualization in mixed-reality, quick introduction of this innovative tool would support clients to determine the size and installation location of a special tree.

키워드

과제정보

이 연구는 2021년도 한국연구재단 연구비 지원에 의한 결과의 일부임. 과제번호:2021R1A2C1095606

참고문헌

  1. Ahn, K. J., & Ko, D. S. (2019). Implementation and feasibility test of the mixed reality service platform for application of architectural field. The Journal of Korean Institute of Information Technology, 17(1), 149-156. https://doi.org/10.14801/jkiit.2019.17.1.149
  2. Ahn, M. S. (2017). The Study on the Differences of Space Design Recognition System -Focused on the Differences of Recognition among Clients, Designers and Users-. Ph.D, Seoul National University.
  3. An, J. Y., Choi, J. M., Kwon, S. H., Song, D. H., & Ock, J. H. (2010). A study on the development of the project management system based on augmented reality. Journal of Korea Academia-Industrial Cooperation Society, 11(8), 3083-3093. https://doi.org/10.5762/KAIS.2010.11.8.3083
  4. Baek, K. Y. (2020). Feasibility Study to Introduce Mixed Reality for Supporting Clients Design Decision Making in Office Building Remodeling Projects. Thesis, Hanyang University.
  5. Carrasco, M. D. O., & Chen, P. H. (2021). Application of mixed reality for improving architectural design comprehension effectiveness. Automation in Construction, 126, 103677. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2021.103677
  6. Cuff, D. (1992). Architecture: The story of a practice. MIT Press.
  7. Deng, B., Kim, Y. H., Cao, L., & Heo, S. H. (2019). Realization method for landscape architecture design using virtual reality technology - focused on the residential garden design -. Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture, 47(3), 71-80. https://doi.org/10.9715/KILA.2019.47.3.071
  8. Han, M., Baek, K., Lee, K. T., Ko, S., & Kim, J. H. (2021). A study on supporting design decision making in office building remodeling projects by introducing mixed reality. Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 22(1), 3-12. https://doi.org/10.6106/KJCEM.2021.22.1.003
  9. Hong, S. W., & Yoo, C. G. (2014). The applications of online, multi-user virtual environments for architectural & interior design communication. Journal of the Korean Housing Association, 25(1), 41-50 https://doi.org/10.6107/JKHA.2014.25.1.041
  10. Ju, J. J., Kim, C. W., & Jeong, E. Y. (2007). A study on the analysis of satisfaction index in library remodeling. Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea Planning & Design, 23(8), 53-62.
  11. Jung, K. Y. (2019). Analysis of Image and Preference of Pine Tree in Landscaping of Apartment Complex - Focused on the Apartment Complex Ilsan Xi in Goyang -. Thesis, Hanyang University.
  12. Kalantari, M., & Rauschnabel, P. (2018). Exploring the early adopters of augmented reality smart glasses: The case of Microsoft HoloLens. In Augmented Reality and Virtual Reality. Springer, Cham, 229-245.
  13. Kalay, Y. E. (2004). Architecture's New Media: Principles, Theories, and Methods of Computer Aided Design. MIT Press.
  14. Kang, L. S., Moon, J. S., & Kwon, J. H. (2007). Development of virtual reality functions for visualizing concept design information for civil engineering projects. Journal of the Korean Society of Civil Engineers D, 27(6D), 759-765.
  15. Keane, P., Sertyesilisik, B., & Ross, A. D. (2010). Variations and change orders on construction projects. Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction, 2(2), 89-96. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000016
  16. Kim, B. Y., & Son, Y. H. (2017). A study on the effects of BIM adoption and methods of implementation in landscape architecture through an analysis of overseas cases. Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture, 45(1), 52-62. https://doi.org/10.9715/KILA.2017.45.1.052
  17. Kim, J. K. (2007). A Study on Construction Quality Improvement and Design Changes of Landscape Architectural Projects. Thesis, Seoul National University.
  18. Kim, T. K. (2021). Research on contract change system in construction contracts - focusing on adjusting the contractamount due to design changes in the U.S.A -. Dong-A Journal of International Business Transactions Law, (33), 207-240.
  19. Kim, Y. D., Choo, S. Y., Seo, J. H., & Kim, T. H. (2019). An application of BIM-based mixed reality to improve BF certification. Korean Journal of Computational Design and Engineering, 24(2), 211-222. https://doi.org/10.7315/CDE.2019.211
  20. Korea Land & Housing Corporation, (2018). A Design Guidebook -Landscape-.
  21. Kwon, N. H., Park, M. S., & Lee, H. S. (2012). Key factors to improve communication method in early design stage. Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 10, 613-614.
  22. Lee, J. G., & Seo, J. O. (2020). Architectural design collaboration using BIM-based spatial augmented reality (SAR) technology. Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 21(4), 31-34.
  23. Lee, J. I., & Park, E. G. (2007). A study on client in building act on agency theory. Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea Planning & Design, 23(3), 107-116.
  24. Lee, J. P. (2019). Development and trend of virtual/augmented/mixed reality technology. Weekly ICT Trends, Institute for Information & Communication Technology Planning & Evaluation, 1881, 2-15.
  25. Lee, S. G. (2007). Survey on mixed reality R&D. Korea Computer Graphics Society, 13(2), 1-15.
  26. Lee, S. H., Kim, J. S., Song, J. Y., & Lee, J. K. (2020). An approach to the on-site visualization in early phase of design based on Augmented Reality(AR) -focused on an example of a university library renovation planning-. Journal of the Korean Institute of Interior Design, 29(1), 97-104. https://doi.org/10.14774/JKIID.2020.29.1.097
  27. Mann, H. B., & Whitney, D. R. (1947). On a test of whether one of two random variables is stochastically larger than the other. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 50-60.
  28. Memon, A. H., Rahman, I. A., & Hasan, M. F. A. (2014). Significant causes and effects of variation orders in construction projects. Research Journal of Applied Sciences, Engineering and Technology, 7(21), 4494-4502. https://doi.org/10.19026/rjaset.7.826
  29. Milgram, P., & Kishino, F. (1994). A taxonomy of mixed reality visual displays. IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Information and Systems, 77(12), 1321-1329.
  30. Min, Y. H., Jeong, M. H., Lee, J. M., & Ryu, J. H. (2018). Proposal of basic design review method using augmented reality technology for architectural consultation with building client - focused on functional layout and interior design -. Design Convergence Study, 17(2), 105-119. https://doi.org/10.31678/SDC.69.7
  31. Moon, S. Y., Yun, S. Y., Kim, H. S., & Kang, L. S. (2015). Improved method for increasing maintenance efficiency of construction structure using augmented reality by marker-less method. Journal of the Korean Society of Civil Engineers, 35(4), 961-968. https://doi.org/10.12652/KSCE.2015.35.4.0961
  32. Noor, A. K. (2016). The hololens revolution. Mechanical Engineering, 138(10), 30-35. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2016-Oct-1
  33. Oh, S. H. (2015). A research on expandability of cultural assets restoration blend using virtual reality. Journal of Digital Convergence, 13(8), 465-472. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2015.13.8.465
  34. Park, J. Y. (2010). A Study on the Factor Analysis of the Change Order in the Landscape Architecture Planting Construction : Focused on the Landscape Architecture Planting Construction of Housing Complex. Thesis, Hanyang University.
  35. Park, K. S. (2020). Development of mixed reality based baekje neungsa cultural heritage on-site guide system for smart tourism. Journal of the Korea Institute of Information and Communication Engineering, 24(4), 481-488. https://doi.org/10.6109/JKIICE.2020.24.4.481
  36. Rho, S. G. (2010). A Study on the Value Perception about Pinus densiflora on Landscape Architecture Design. Thesis, Kyungpook National University.
  37. Sampaio, A. Z., & Martins, O. P. (2014). The application of virtual reality technology in the construction of bridge: The cantilever and incremental launching methods. Automation in Construction, 37, 58-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2013.10.015
  38. Song, E. J. (2020). How to create mixed reality educational contents using Hololens. Journal of the Korea Institute of Information and Communication Engineering, 24(3), 391-397. https://doi.org/10.6109/JKIICE.2020.24.3.391
  39. Speicher, M., Hall, B. D., & Nebeling, M. (2019). What is mixed reality?. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1-15.
  40. Sunday, O. A. (2010). Impact of variation orders on public construction projects. In 26th Annual ARCOM Conference, Leeds, UK.
  41. The Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture (2014). Standard Specification for Landscaping Construction. The Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture
  42. Yoon, J. Y. (2021). Construction Relations Dispute Law. 8th Generation, Pakyoungsa press.
  43. Yu, C. S., & Kim, J. H. (2021). Differences on Decision Making Process According to the Role in Corporation Client's Organization in Building Projects. Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea, 37(5), 41-52. https://doi.org/10.5659/JAIK.2021.37.5.41