산업융합연구 (Journal of Industrial Convergence)

  • 제20권9호
  • /
  • Pages.131-139
  • /
  • 2022
  • /
  • 2635-8875(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2672-0124(eISSN)
대한산업경영학회 (DAEHAN Society of Industrial Management)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

노인의 지역사회 내 계속거주(AIP) 의향에 영향을 미치는 요인: 동거형태를 중심으로

The Effects of Older Persons' Inclination to Choose Aging in Place(AIP): Focusing on Living Arrangements

  • 투고 : 2022.05.16
  • 심사 : 2022.09.20
  • 발행 : 2022.09.28
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구의 목적은 노인이 건강상태가 악화되어도 시설에 입소하지 않고 지역사회 내에서 계속 거주하기를 원하는 노인들의 주거욕구 영향요인을 현재 노인들의 동거형태를 중심으로 분석하였다. 노인실태조사에 의하면 우리나라 노인의 동거형태는 독신 및 부부가구의 구성 외에 기혼성인자녀와 동거하는 경우와 미혼성인자녀와 동거하는 경우로 세분하였다. 이에 본 연구에서는 2020년 노인복지실태조사 자료를 통해 노인의 인구사회학적 특성과 동거형태에 따라 지역사회 내에서 계속거주 의향에 미치는 영향에 대해 SPSS 25 프로그램을 활용해 분석하였다. 주요 연구결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 노인의 인구사회학적 특성의 성별, 연령, 주택소유 여부가 통계적 유의수준으로 나타났다. 둘째, 노인의 동거형태가 독신가구일 경우 지역사회 계속거주 의향에 부정적 영향을, 부부가구일 경우와 장남과 동거할 경우 지역사회 계속거주 의향에 긍정적 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났고 이는 통계적으로 유의한 수준으로 나타났다. 이를 바탕으로 노인의 지역사회 내 계속거주를 증진시키기 위해 재가 돌봄 강화, 고령친화 환경 개선 등 노인복지정책 수립에 필요한 기초자료와 함께 정책적 제언을 제시하였다.

The purpose of this study was to ensure that the elderly do not enter a facility even if their health deteriorates, but continue to live in the community and receive necessary care. According to the survey of the elderly, the cohabitation type of the elderly in Korea was that they lived with married adults and/or unmarried children in addition to single and married households. Therefore, in this study, using the SPSS 25 program, the effects of the elderly's socio-demographic characteristics and cohabitation type on the intention to continue living in the community was analyzed using the 2020 elderly welfare status survey data. The main research results are as follows. First, gender, age, and residence type of the demographic characteristics of the elderly were found to be statistically significant. Second, single households, married households, and households living with the eldest son revealed the statistical significance level of the elderly. Based on this, we were intending to provide basic data necessary for establishing welfare policies for the elderly, such as strengthening care and an age-friendly environment, in order to improve the continued residence of the elderly in the local community.

키워드

과제정보

본 연구는 2020년 1차 한세대학교 교내학술연구비 지원에 의해 연구되었음.

참고문헌

  1. Korean Statistical Information Service. (2020). 2020 Elderly Survey(Online). http://repository.kihasa.re.kr
  2. O. J. Kwon, Y. M. Lee, H. H. Ha, J. Y. Kim & H. S. Yeom. (2014). Reasons for Seniors Aging in Place within Their Community. Reasons for Seniors Aging in Place within Their Community, 52(3), 2875-299. DOI : 10.6115/2014.025
  3. Y. K. Lee, J. H. Yeom & S. H. Lee. (2013). A Study of Demand Estimation and Reorganization of Provision System for Elderly Welfare Service in response to an aging society. Korea Institute for Health and Affairs, 2013-31-15.
  4. Ministry of Health and Welfare. (2022). Welfare facilities for the elderly. http://www.mohw.go.kr
  5. Korean Statistical Information Service. (2020). 2020 Elderly Survey(Online). http://repository.kihasa.re.kr
  6. S. C. Lee, Y. R. Park & E. H. Jung. (2015). An Exploratory Study on the Perceived Concept of Age-Friendly Environments and Its Relationship with Active Aging of Older Persons. Seoul Urban Research, 17(2), 119-137. DOI : 10.23129/seouls.17.2.201606.119
  7. A. Bookman. (2008). Innovative models of aging in place: Transforming our communities for an aging population. Community, Work&Family, 11(4), 419-438. DOI : 10.1080/13668800802362334
  8. K. D. Marek & M. J. Rantz. (2000). Aging in place: A new model for long term care. Nursing Administration Quarterly, 24(3), 1-11.
  9. G. Rowles. (1983). Geographical Dimensions of Social Support in Rural Appalachian Community, In:Graham Rowles & Russell Ohta(eds.), Aging and Milieu: Environmental Perspectives on Growing Old. New York: Academic Press, 231-239.
  10. J. L. Wiles et al. (2011). The Meaning of Aging in Place to Older People. The Gerontologist, 52(3), 357-366.
  11. S. J. Kim. (2010, May). Seoul's age-friendly city promotion strategy. SDI policy report, 64, 2010:1-20.
  12. Y. K. Lee. (2018, May). Current Status of and Barriers to Home and Community Care in the Long-term Care System. Health and Welfare Policy Forum, 77-89.
  13. M. H. Lee, J. J. Lee & B. K. Seo. (2015). Improving delivery system of care services for older adults in South Korea : Support for aging in place. The Journal of Korea Long Term Care, 3(1), 30-56.
  14. M. A. Lee. (2010). An Analysis on Factors Affecting Korean Elderly People's ADL. The Korean Journal of Community Living Science, 21(2), 201-210. UCI : G704-001337.2010.004
  15. M. A. Lee. (1998). Caregiver Characteristics and Experiences: Their Effects on the Probability of Nursing Home Admission. Korean Gerontology, 18(2), 80-96.
  16. M. A. Lee. (2015). The Effects of Social Quality on Suicide Ideation of Korean Elderly. Journal of Digital Convergence, 13(3), 271-281. DOI : 10.14400/JDC.2015.13.3.271
  17. H. J. Lee, Y. S. Lee & S. J. Lee. (2010). A Case Study on Relationship between Environmental Affordance and Holistic Health of the Active Elderly. Journal of the Korean Housing Association, 21(2), 77-86. DOI : 10.6107/2010.077