DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparison of Cryoprotectants and Cryopreservation Protocols for Eleutherococcus senticosus via Somatic Embryogenesis

  • Ahn, Chang Ho (Division of Garden Material Research, Korea Institute of Arboretum Management) ;
  • Shin, Jung Won (Division of Garden Material Research, Korea Institute of Arboretum Management) ;
  • Lee, Ha Na (Division of Garden Material Research, Korea Institute of Arboretum Management) ;
  • Yoon, Hyun Won (Division of Garden Material Research, Korea Institute of Arboretum Management) ;
  • Seo, Jeong Min (Division of Garden Material Research, Korea Institute of Arboretum Management) ;
  • Kim, Yeoung Ryul (Division of Garden Material Research, Korea Institute of Arboretum Management) ;
  • Baek, Saeng Geul (Division of Garden Material Research, Korea Institute of Arboretum Management) ;
  • Nam, Jae Ik (Division of Garden Material Research, Korea Institute of Arboretum Management) ;
  • Choi, Yong Eui (Division of Forest Sciences, College of Forest and Environmental Sciences, Kangwon National University)
  • 투고 : 2022.06.24
  • 심사 : 2022.08.20
  • 발행 : 2022.09.30

초록

A cryopreservation is an essential tool for preservation of germplasm. In this study, the possibility for cryopreservation of embryogenic cells of Siberian ginseng (Eleutherococcus senticosus) in liquid nitrogen (-196℃) was evaluated. The effects of glycerol and dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) at different concentrations (5%, 10% and 20%) as cryoprotectants on regrowth of cryopreserved E. senticosus embryogenic cells were tested. There was significant effect of cryoprotectants on regrowth of embryogenic cells (p=0.0019). The highest and lowest fresh mass gain were achieved when embryogenic cells were frozen with 10% DMSO and 5% glycerol (138.2±5.9 and 61.3±14.6, respectively). The effect of the cryoprotectants on the frequency embryo germination was tested. There was no significant difference between glycerol and DMSO (p=0.846). Three different concentrations of cryoprotectants did not significantly affect the frequency embryo germination (p=0.534). Finally, the genetic fidelity of the plantlets regenerated from non-cryopreserved and cryopreserved embryogenic cells was tested by random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) and inter simple sequence repeat (ISSR) analysis. RAPD and ISSR analysises showed that there was no genetic variation among regenerants.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Ahn CH, Kim YS, Lim S, Yi JS, Choi YE. 2011. Random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) analysis and RAPD-derived sequence characterized amplified regions (SCAR) marker development to identify Chinese and Korean ginseng. J Med Plants Res 5: 4487-4492.
  2. Al-Bahrany AM, Al-Khayri JM. 2012. Optimizing in vitro cryopreservation of date palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.). Biotechnology 11: 59-66. https://doi.org/10.3923/biotech.2012.59.66
  3. An C. 2019. In vitro propagation of commonly used medicinal trees in Korea. J For Environ Sci 35: 272-280.
  4. Arakawa T, Carpenter JF, Kita YA, Crowe JH. 1990. The basis for toxicity of certain cryoprotectants: a hypothesis. Cryobiology 27: 401-415. https://doi.org/10.1016/0011-2240(90)90017-X
  5. Benson EE. 2008. Cryopreservation of phytodiversity: a critical appraisal of theory & practice. Crit Rev Plant Sci 27: 141-219. https://doi.org/10.1080/07352680802202034
  6. Bhattacharya S. 2018. Cryoprotectants and their usage in cryopreservation process. In: Cryopreservation Biotechnology in Biomedical and Biological Sciences (Bozkurt Y, ed). IntechOpen, London, pp 7-20.
  7. Chakrabarty D, Yu KW, Paek KY. 2003. Detection of DNA methylation changes during somatic embryogenesis of Siberian ginseng (Eleuterococcus senticosus). Plant Sci 165: 61-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-9452(03)00127-4
  8. Cheong EJ. 2019. Organogenesis from callus derived from in vitro root tissues of wild Prunus yedoensis matsumura. J For Environ Sci 35: 41-46.
  9. Choi YE, Jeong JH. 2002a. Dormancy induction of somatic embryos of Siberian ginseng by high sucrose concentrations enhances the conservation of hydrated artificial seeds and dehydration resistance. Plant Cell Rep 20: 1112-1116. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00299-002-0455-y
  10. Choi YE, Kim JW, Yoon ES. 1999. High frequency of plant production via somatic embryogenesis from callus or cell suspension cultures in Eleutherococcus senticosus. Annal Bot 83: 309-314. https://doi.org/10.1006/anbo.1998.0827
  11. Choi YE, Ko SK, Lee KS, Yoon ES. 2002b. Production of plantlets of Eleutherococcus sessiliflorus via somatic embryogenesis and successful transfer to soil. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 69: 201-204. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015290718273
  12. Choudhary R, Chaudhury R, Malik SK, Kumar S, Pal D. 2013. Genetic stability of mulberry germplasm after cryopreservation by two-step freezing technique. Afr J Biotechnol 12: 5983-5993. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJB2013.12916
  13. Fernandes P, Rodriguez E, Pinto G, Roldan-Ruiz I, De Loose M, Santos C. 2008. Cryopreservation of Quercus suber somatic embryos by encapsulation-dehydration and evaluation of genetic stability. Tree Physiol 28: 1841-1850. https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/28.12.1841
  14. Gantait S, Kundu S, Wani SH, Das PK. 2016. Cryopreservation of forest tree seeds: a mini-review. J For Environ Sci 32: 311-322.
  15. Gui Y, Guo Z, Ke S, Skirvin RM. 1991. Somatic embryogenesis and plant regeneration in Acanthopanax senticosus. Plant Cell Rep 9: 514-516. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00232108
  16. Han JY, Choi YE. 2003. Mass production of Eleutherococcus senticosus plants through in vitro cell culture. Korean J Plant Biotechnol 30: 167-172. https://doi.org/10.5010/JPB.2003.30.2.167
  17. Harding K. 2004. Genetic integrity of cryopreserved plant cells: a review. Cryo Letters 25: 3-22.
  18. Jeong JH, Kim YS, Moon HK, Hwang SJ, Choi YE. 2009. Effects of LED on growth, morphogenesis and eleutheroside contents of in vitro cultured plantlets of Eleutherococcus senticosus maxim. Korean J Med Crop Sci 17: 39-45.
  19. Lee WT. 1979. Distribution of Acanthopanax plants in Korea. Korean J Pharmacogn 10: 103-107.
  20. Lee YS, Jung SH, Lim SS, Ji J, Lee SH, Shin KH. 2001. Effects of the water extract from the stem bark of Acanthopanax senticosus on hyperlipidemia in rats. Korean J Pharmacogn 32: 103-107.
  21. Li CH, Lim JD, Heo K, Kim MJ, Lee CO, Lee JG, Cui XS, Yu CY. 2004. Long-term cold storage and plant regeneration of suspension cultured somatic embryos of Eleutherococcus senticosus maxim. Korean J Med Crop Sci 12: 494-499.
  22. Li CH, Lim JD, Kim MJ, Kim NY, Yu CY. 2005. Acclimatization and growth characteristics of plantlets of Eleutherococcus senticosus maxim cultured by bioreactor. Korean J Med Crop Sci 13: 133-137.
  23. Mikula A, Tomiczak K, Rybczynski JJ. 2011. Cryopreservation enhances embryogenic capacity of Gentiana cruciata (L.) suspension culture and maintains (epi)genetic uniformity of regenerants. Plant Cell Rep 30: 565-574. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00299-010-0970-1
  24. Murashige T, Skoog F. 1962. A revised medium for rapid growth and bio assays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol Plant 15: 473-497. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.1962.tb08052.x
  25. Panis B, Lambardi M. 2005. Status of cryopreservation technologies in plants (crops and forest trees). In: The Role of Biotechnology for the Characterization and Conservation of Crop, Forest, Animal and Fishery Genetic Resources in Developing Countries (FAO, ed). FAO, Turin, pp 43-54.
  26. Richards CM, Reilley A, Touchell D, Antolin MF, Walters C. 2004. Microsatellite primers for Texas wild rice (Zizania texana), and a preliminary test of the impact of cryogenic storage on allele frequency at these loci. Conserv Genet 5: 853-859. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10592-004-1977-3
  27. Seol Y, Yong SH, Choi E, Jeong MJ, Suh GU, Lee CH, Choi MS. 2020. Optimization conditions for cryopreservation of Deutzia paniculata nakai, endangered plant. J For Environ Sci 36: 274-280.
  28. Sun YL, Liu LD, Hong SK. 2011. Eleutherococcus senticosus as a crude medicine: review of biotechnological effects. J Med Plants Res 5: 6105-6111.
  29. Yu CY, Kim JK, Ahn SD. 1997. Callus formation and plant regeneration from immature embryos of Eleutherococcus senticosus. Korean J Med Crop Sci 5: 49-55.