Acknowledgement
This work was supported by the Ministry of Education of the Republic of Korea and the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF-2016S1A5A2A01023762).
References
- Brainard, D. H. (1997). The psychophysics toolbox. Spatial Vision, 10(4), 433-436. https://doi.org/10.1163/156856897X00357
- Belke, B., Leder, H., & Carbon, C. C. (2015). When challenging art gets liked: Evidences for a dual preference formation process for fluent and non-fluent portraits. PloS one, 10(8), e0131796. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0131796
- Berlyne, D. E. (1970). Novelty, complexity, and hedonic value. Perception & Psychophysics, 8(5-A), 279-286. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03212593
- Bernberg, R. E. (1953). Prestige suggestion in art as communication. The Journal of Social Psychology, 38(1), 23-30. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.1953.9711433
- Boselie, F. (1991). Against prototypicality as a central concept in aesthetics. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 9(1), 65-73. https://doi.org/10.2190/ERDR-FN28-PUEE-EU7F
- Chatterjee A., Widick P., Sternschein R., Smith W. B., & Bromberger B. (2010). The assessment of art attributes. Empirical Studies of Arts, 28(2), 207-222. https://doi.org/10.2190/EM.28.2.f
- Dearden, P. (1984). Factors influencing landscape preferences: An empirical investigation. Landscape Planning, 11(4), 293-306. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3924(84)90026-1
- Elgammal, A., Liu, B., Elhoseiny, M., & Mazzone, M. (2017). Can: Creative adversarial networks, generating "art" by learning about styles and deviating from style norms. arXiv Preprint arXiv: 1706.07068.
- Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A. G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G* Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175-191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146
- Feist, G. J. & Brady, T. R. (2004). Openness to experience, non-conformity, and the preference for abstract art. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 22(1), 77-89. https://doi.org/10.2190/Y7CA-TBY6-V7LR-76GK
- Flexas, A., Rossello, J., de Miguel, P., Nadal, M., & Munar, E. (2014). Cognitive control and unusual decisions about beauty: An fMRI study. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8(520), 1-9.
- Gangadharbatla, H. (2021). The role of ai attribution knowledge in the evaluation of artwork. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 40(2), 125-142. https://doi.org/10.1177/0276237421994697
- Gergen, K. J. & Breger, I. (1965). Two forms of inference and problems in the assessment of creativity. In Proceedings of the Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, 215-216.
- Hekkert, P. & Van Wieringen, P. C. (1990). Complexity and prototypicality as determinants of the appraisal of cubist paintings. British Journal of Psychology, 81(4), 483-495. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.1990.tb02374.x
- Hong, J. W. & Curran, N. M. (2019). Artificial intelligence, artists, and art: Attitudes toward artwork produced by humans vs. artificial intelligence. ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing, Communications, and Applications (TOMM), 15(2s), 1-16.
- Huang, M., Bridge, H., Kemp, M. J., & Parker, A. J. (2011). Human cortical activity evoked by the assignment of authenticity when viewing works of art. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 5(134), 1-9.
- Isham, E. A., Ekstrom, A. D., & Banks, W. P. (2010). Effects of youth authorship on the appraisal of paintings. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 4(4), 235. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019308
- Jakesch, M. & Leder, H. (2009). Finding meaning in art: Preferred levels of ambiguity in art appreciation. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62(11), 2105-2112. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470210903038974
- Kirk, U., Skov, M., Hulme, O., Christensen, M. S., & Zeki, S. (2009). Modulation of aesthetic value by semantic context: An fMRI study. NeuroImage, 44(3), 1125-1132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.10.009
- Leder, H., Belke, B., Oeberst, A., & Augustin, D. (2004). A model of aesthetic appreciation and aesthetic judgments. British Journal of Psychology, 95(4), 489-508. https://doi.org/10.1348/0007126042369811
- Leder, H., Carbon, C. C., & Ripsas, A. L. (2006). Entitling art: Influence of title information on understanding and appreciation of paintings. Acta Psychologica, 121(2), 176-198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2005.08.005
- Leder, H., & Nadal, M. (2014). Ten years of a model of aesthetic appreciation and aesthetic judgments: The aesthetic episode - Developments and challenges in empirical aesthetics. British Journal of Psychology, 105(4), 443-446. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12084
- Lee, K. & Ashton, M. C. (2004). Psychometric properties of the HEXACO personality inventory. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39(2), 329-358. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr3902_8
- Martindale, C. & Moore, K. (1988). Priming, prototypicality, and preference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14(4), 661. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.14.4.661
- Mastandrea, S., Bartoli, G., & Bove, G. (2009). Preferences for ancient and modern art museums: Visitor experiences and personality characteristics. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 3(3), 164-173. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013142
- Mordvintsev, A., Olah, C., & Tyka, M. (2015). Inceptionism: going deeper into neural networks. Retrieved from http://googleresearch.blogspot.com/2015/06/inceptionism-going-deeper-into-neural.html.
- Muth, C. & Carbon, C. C. (2013). The aesthetic aha: On the pleasure of having insights into Gestalt. Acta Psychologica, 144(1), 25-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.05.001
- Newman, G. E. & Bloom, P. (2012). Art and authenticity: The importance of originals in judgments of value. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 141(3), 558-569. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026035
- Pelli, D. G. (1997). The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics. Spatial Vision, 10, 437-442. https://doi.org/10.1163/156856897X00366
- Ragot, M., Martin, N., & Cojean, S. (2020). Ai-generated vs. human artworks. a perception bias towards artificial intelligence? In Extended abstracts of the 2020 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 1-10).
- Silveira, S., Fehse, K., Vedder, A., Elvers, K., & Hennig-Fastm K. (2015). Is it the picture or is it the frame? An fMRI study on the neurobiology of framing effects. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9, 528.
- Song, J., Kwak, Y., & Kim, C.-Y. (2021). Familiarity and novelty in aesthetic preference: The effects of the properties of the artwork and the beholder. Frontiers in Psychology, 12.
- Szegedy, C., Liu, W., Jia, Y., Sermanet, P., Reed, S., Anguelov, D., Erhan, D., Vanhoucke, V., & Rabinovich A. (2015). Going deeper with convolutions. Proceedings of the IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 1-9.
- Yoon, Y. & Lee, S. (2016). Does the preference for emotional paintings depends on personality?. Science of Emotion and Sensibility, 19(3), 15-26. https://doi.org/10.14695/KJSOS.2016.19.3.15