DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Impact of Linguistic Misinformation on Shaping Saudi Awareness: An Empirical Study of Saudi Perception of Social Media News

  • Khafaga, Ayman (College of Science and Humanities, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University)
  • Received : 2022.11.05
  • Published : 2022.11.30

Abstract

The main objective of this paper is to probe the extent to which misinformation propagated through the different social media platforms contribute effectively in the process of directing, shaping and reshaping societal awareness of Saudis. In so doing, this paper attempts to delve into the relationship between linguistic misinformation and societal awareness, by exploring the perception of Saudis towards social media news, particularly misinformation and the extent to which this misinformation influences the social attitudes of Saudis in terms of various societal issues. Two main research questions are addressed in this study. First, to what extent does social media misinformation affect Saudis' awareness? Second, what are the linguistic manifestations of misinformation presented in the different social platforms? Two main findings have been recorded in this study: first, misinformation significantly contributes to the societal awareness of Saudis; and, second, however misinformation is linguistically manifested at the different levels of linguistic analysis, it is highly representative at the lexicalization level of language use.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

The author extends his appreciation to Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University for funding this research work through the project number (PSAU/2022/02/21304).

References

  1. Balakrishnan, V., and Lay, G. Student's learning style and their effects on the use of social media technology for learning. Telematics and Informatics, 33, 808-821, (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2015.12.004
  2. Ha, L., Perez, A., and Ray, R. Mapping recent development in scholarship on fake news and misinformation, 2008 to 2017: Disciplinary contribution, topics, and impact. American Behavioral Scientist, vol. 65, no. 2, pp. 290-315, (2021). https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764219869402
  3. Thorne, S. L. The intercultural turn and language learning in the crucible of new media. In F. Helm & S. Guth (eds.), Telecollaboration 2.0 for Language and Intercultural Learning (pp. 139-164). Bern: Peter Lang, (2010).
  4. Guo, L., and Vargo, C. "Fake news" and emerging online media ecosystem. Communication Research, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 178-200, (2020). https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650218777177
  5. Rice, R. E., Gustafson, A., and Hoffman, Z. Frequent but Accurate: A Closer Look at Uncertainty and Opinion Divergence in Climate Change Print News. Environmental Communication (12:3), pp. 301-321, (2018). https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2018.1430046
  6. Shane, S. The fake Americans Russia created to influence the election. from https://www.nytimes.com/2017/09/07/us/politics/russia-facebooktwitter-election.html, (2017)
  7. McGrath, G. Measuring the Concept of Credibility. Journalism Quarterly, 63, (3), pp. 12- 24, (1986). https://doi.org/10.1177/107769908606300102
  8. Shearer, E., and Mitchell, A. News use across social media platforms in 2020. London: Sage, (2021).
  9. Kirby, E. J. The city getting rich from fake news. BBC News, (2016).
  10. Maheshwari, S. 20th century fox gives real apology for a fake news campaign. The New York Times. Business Day, (2017).
  11. Azzimonti, M., and Fernandes, M. Social media networks, fake news, and polarization. National Bureau of Economic Research, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 35-61, (2018).
  12. Weeks, B. de. Gil, and Zuniga, H. "What's next? Six observations for the future of political misinformation research," American Behavioral Scientist, vol. 65, no. 2, pp. 277-289, (2021). https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764219878236
  13. de la Garza, A. How social media is shaping our fears of and responses to the Coronavirus. Times, available at: https://time.come/5802802/social-media-coronavirus/ (Accessed: 22 September, 2022), (2020).
  14. Arias, E. How does media influence social norms? Experimental evidence on the role of common knowledge. Political Science Research and Methods, vol. 7, no.3, pp. 561-578, (2019). https://doi.org/10.1017/psrm.2018.1
  15. Zollmann, F. Bringing propaganda back into news media studies. Critical Sociology, vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 329-345, (2019). https://doi.org/10.1177/0896920517731134
  16. Vamanu, I. Fake news and propaganda: A critical discourse research perspective. Open Information Science, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 197-208, (2019). https://doi.org/10.1515/opis-2019-0014
  17. Fairclough, N. Media discourse. Edward Arnold, London, (1995).
  18. Fowler, R. Language in the news: Discourse and ideology in the press. Routledge, New York, (1991).
  19. Koidl, K., and T. Matthews, Measuring impact of rumors messages in social media. NOBIDS, pp. 1-16, (2017).
  20. Lukasik, M., Cohn, T., and Bontcheva, K. Classifying tweet level judgments of rumors in social media. Hospital, vol. 796, no. 487, p. 132, (2015).
  21. Mendoza, M., Poblete, B., and Castillo, C. Twitter under crisis: can we trust what we write? Proceedings of the first workshop on social media analytics. ACM, pp. 71-79, (2010).
  22. Dwoskin, E., and Shaban, H. Facebook Will Now Ask Users to Rank News Organizations They Trust. The Washington Post, (2018).
  23. Dwoskin, E., and Timberg, C. How Merchants Use Facebook to Flood Amazon with Fake Reviews. The Washington Post, (2018).
  24. Roberts, D. Yelp's Fake Review Problem. Fortune magazine, (2013).
  25. Minas, R. K., Potter, R. F., Dennis, A. R., Bartelt, V. L., and Bae, S. Putting on the Thinking Cap: Using Neurois to Understand Information Processing Biases in Virtual Teams," Journal of Management Information Systems (30:4), pp. 49-82, (2014). https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222300403
  26. Goyanes, M., Borah, P., and Gil de Zuniga, H. Social media filtering and democ- racy: Effects of social media news use and uncivil political discussions on social media unfriending," Computers in Human Behavior, vol. 120, pp. 106759, (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106759
  27. Bandura, A. Social cognitive theory of mass communication. Media Psychology, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 265- 299, (2001). https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532785XMEP0303_03
  28. Barkho, L. Editorial policies and news discourse-how Al Jazeera's implicit guidelines shape its coverage of Middle East conflicts. Journalism, vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 1357-1374, (2021). https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884919841797
  29. Oh, O., Agrawal, M., and Rao, H. R. Community intelligence and social media services: A rumor theoretic analysis of tweets during social crises. Mis. Quarterly, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 407-426, (2013). https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2013/37.2.05
  30. Koidl, K., and Matthews, T. Measuring Impact of Rumors Messages in Social Media. NOBIDS, 1-16, (2017).
  31. Lee, S. Connecting social media use with gaps in knowledge and participation in a protest context: The case of candle light vigil in South Korea. Asian Journal of Communication, vol. 29, pp. 111-127, (2019). https://doi.org/10.1080/01292986.2018.1549264
  32. Lopes, A. R. The impact of social media on social movements: The new opportunity and mobilizing structure," Journal of Political Science Research, vol. 4, pp. 1-23, (2014).
  33. Lee, S., and Xenos, M. Social distraction? Social media use and political knowledge in two US presidential elections. Computers in Human Behavior, vol. 90, pp. 18-25, (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.08.006
  34. Rogers, R., and Niederer, S. The politics of social media manipulation. in R. Rogers and S. Niederer (Eds.), The politics of Social Media Manipulation. Amestrdam University Press, 2020, 19-70, (2020).
  35. Repoll, S. Social dimension of the COVID-19 outbreak in China and beyond. Institute of Development Studies, available at: https://www.ids.ac.uk/news/ids-researchers-attend-world-healthorganization/.(Accessed:20 September, 2022), (2020).
  36. Toendan, W. Research methods. Palangka Raya: University of Palangka Raya, (2013).
  37. Jones, M. O. The gulf information war propaganda, fake news, and fake trends: The weaponization of twitter bots in the gulf crisis. International journal of communication, vol. 13, pp. 27, (2019).
  38. Khafaga, A. F. A computational approach to explore the extremist ideologies of Daesh discourse". International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, vol. 11, no. 8, pp. 193-199, (2020).
  39. Fowler, R., Hodge, B., Kress, G., and Trew, T. Language and control. Routledge, (2018).
  40. Allcott, H., and Gentzkow, M. "Social media and fake news in the 2016 election," Journal of economic perspectives, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 211-36, (2017). https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.31.2.211
  41. Khafaga, A., Strategies of political persuasion in literary genres: A computational approach to critical discourse analysis. Germany: LAMBERT Publication, (2017).
  42. Wilson, T. D., and Walsh, C. Information behavior: An interdisciplinary perspective. Sheffield: University of Sheffield Department of Information Studies." Available at: http://informationr.net/tdw/publ/infbehav/cont.html (Accessed: 19 October, 2022), (1996).
  43. Khafaga, A., Linguistic manipulation of political myth in Margaret Atwood's The Handmaid's Tale. International Journal of English Linguistics, 7(3), 189-200, (2017). https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v7n3p189
  44. van Dijk, T. A., Ideology and discourse analysis. Journal of Political Ideologies, 11(2), pp. 115-140, (2006). https://doi.org/10.1080/13569310600687908
  45. Sornig, K., Some remarks on linguistic strategies of persuasion, in Wodak, R. (Ed.), Language, power and ideology: Studies in political discourse. John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 95-113, (1989).
  46. Khafaga, A., Linguistic representation of power in Edward Bond's Lear: A lexico-pragmatic approach to critical discourse analysis. International Journal of English Linguistics, 9(6), 404-420, (2019). https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v9n6p404