DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effects of Meteorological Conditions and Self-instruction on Anxiety and Performance of Helicopter Pilots in Flight

기상 조건과 자기 교시가 조종 중인 헬리콥터 조종사의 불안 및 수행에 미치는 영향

  • 김문성 (광운대학교 산업심리학과) ;
  • 김신우 (광운대학교 산업심리학과) ;
  • 이형철 (광운대학교 산업심리학과)
  • Received : 2023.05.24
  • Accepted : 2023.09.07
  • Published : 2023.12.31

Abstract

Anxiety is known to upset the balance of the attentional system and prioritize the stimulus-driven system over the goal-directed system; however, self-instruction induces goal-directed behavior with the self-regulation effect. This study verified the effects of meteorological and self-instruction conditions on pilot anxiety and flight task performance for in-service pilots in a virtual reality environment. The meteorological conditions were divided into visual meteorological and very low visibility conditions, and the flight tasks were conducted by varying whether or not self-instruction was performed. The experiment results reveal that anxiety and heart rate were higher, and the performance of the flight task was lower in the very low visibility condition. However, anxiety and heart rate were lower, and the performance of the flight task was higher in the self-instruction condition. This result suggests that accidents due to difficulty in flight may increase because of anxiety, but such accidents may decrease because of flight performance improvement by self-instruction.

불안은 주의 시스템의 균형을 깨트려 목표 지향 시스템보다 자극 주도 시스템을 우선하게 만드는 것으로 알려져 있으나, 자기 교시는 자기 조절의 효과로 목표 지향적 행동을 유도하게 한다. 본 연구는 가상현실 환경에서 현직 조종사를 대상으로 기상 및 자기 교시 조건이 조종사에게 발생하는 불안과 비행 과제의 수행에 미치는 영향을 검증하였다. 기상 조건은 시계비행 기상 상황과 악기상 상황으로 구분하였고 자기 교시의 수행 여부를 달리하여 비행 과제를 수행하게 하였다. 실험 결과 악기상 상황에서 불안과 심박수가 더 높고 비행 과제의 수행도가 더 낮은 것으로 나타났으나, 자기 교시를 수행하는 조건에서는 불안과 심박수가 더 낮고 비행 과제의 수행도가 더 높은 것으로 나타났다. 이 결과는 불안의 영향으로 비행에 어려움을 겪어 사고로 연결될 가능성이 증가할 수 있으나, 자기 교시에 의한 비행 수행의 향상으로 사고로 연결될 가능성이 감소할 수 있음을 시사한다.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

이 논문은 2023년 광운대학교 교내연구비 지원(이형철)에 의해서 연구되었음..

References

  1. Allsop, J., & Gray, R. (2014). Flying under pressure: Effects of anxiety on attention and gaze behavior in aviation. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 3(2), 63-71. DOI: 10.1016/j.jarmac.2014.04.010
  2. Bellenkes, A. H., Wickens, C. D., & Kramer, A. F. (1997). Visual scanning and pilot expertise: The role of attentional flexibility and mental model development. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, 68(7), 569-579.
  3. Benson, A. J. (2003). Spatial disorientation-a perspective. Royal air force centre of aviation medicine bedfordshire (United Kingdom).
  4. Corbetta, M., & Shulman, G. L. (2002). Control of goal-directed and stimulus-drivenattention in the brain. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 3(3), 201-215. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn755
  5. Department of the Army. (2007). Aircrew training manual utility helicopter H-60 series. Washington, D.C. TC1-237.
  6. Donald Meichenbaum. (1977). Cognitive behaviour modification, Scandinavian Journal of Behaviour Therapy, 6(4), 185-192, https://doi.org/10.1080/16506073.1977.9626708
  7. Durso, F. T., Nickerson, R. S., Dumais, S. T., Lewandowsky, S., & Perfect, T. J. (Eds.). (2007). Handbook of applied cognition. John Wiley & Sons, 364.
  8. Eysenck, M. W., Derakshan, N., Santos, R., & Calvo, M. G. (2007). Anxiety and cognitive performance: Attentional control theory. Emotion, 7(2), 336-353. DOI: 10.1037/1528-3542.7.2.336
  9. HANDBOOK, H. F. FAA-H-8083-21B. (2021). Estados Unidos: Skyhorse.
  10. Kang, Y. (2020). Analysis on pilot's experiences and effects of voice procedure under spatial disorientation (공간정위상실 상황 하 조종사 경험 및 Voice Procedure 효과 분석) (Unpublished Master's Thesis). Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea. Retrieved from http://www.riss.kr/link?id=T15551426
  11. Karoly, P. (1993). Mechanisms of self-regulation: A systems view. Annual Review of Psychology, 44(1), 23-52. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ps.44.020193.000323
  12. Kim, J. T. (1978). The relationship between trait - anxiety and sociality: Focusing on spielberger's STAI(특성-불안과 사회성과의 관계: Spielberger의 STAI를 중심으로) (Unpublished Master's Thesis). Korea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea. Retrieved from http://www.riss.kr/link?id=T7816838
  13. Kim, M., Kim, S., & Li, H. O. (2023). Effect of weather, flight, and time conditions on anxiety and time perception of helicopter pilots in flight, Korean Journal of the Science of Emotion & Sensibility, 26(1), 65-78. DOI: 10.14695/kjsos.2023.26.1.65
  14. Meichenbaum, D., & Goodman, J. (1971). Training impulsive children to talk to themselves: Ameans of developing self-control. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 77(2), 115-126.
  15. Moray, N. (1997). Human factors in process control. In G. Salvendy (ed.), The handbook of human factors and ergonomics (2nd edn). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
  16. Previc, F. H., & Ercoline,W. R. (2004). Spatial disorientation in aviation: Historical background, concepts, and terminology. In F. H. Previc & W. R. Ercoline (Eds.), Spatial disorientation in aviation (pp. 1-36). Lexington, MA: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics.
  17. Seamster, T. L., & Redding, R. E. (2017). Applied cognitive task analysis in aviation. Routledge.
  18. Shappell, S. A., & Wiegmann, D. A. (2003). A human error analysis of general aviationcontrolled flight into terrain accidents occurring between 1990-1998. (Tech. Rep. No.DOT/FAA/AM-03/4). Washington, DC: Federal Aviation Administration, Office ofAerospace Medicine.
  19. Spielberger, C. D., Gorsuch, R. L., & Lushene, R. E. (1970). Manual for the state-trait anxiety inventory. Palo Alto, California, Consulting Psychologist Press.
  20. Staal, M. A. (2004). Stress, cognition, and human performance: A literature review andconceptual framework. Hanover MD: National Aeronautics & Space Administration.
  21. Stokes, A. F., & Kite, K. (1997). Flight stress: Stress, fatigue and performance in aviation. Farnham: Ashgate Publishing Limited.
  22. Wickens, C. D., & Carswell, C. M. (2007). Human information processing. In G. Salvendy (ed.), The handbook of human factors and ergonomics (3rd edn). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
  23. Wickens, C. D., & Hollands, J. (2000). Engineering psychology and human performance (3rd edn). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  24. Wickens, C. D. (1986). The effects of control dynamics on performance. In K. R. Boff, L. Kaufman & J. P. Thomas (eds.), Handbook of perception and performance (Vol. 2, pp. 39-1-39-60). New York: John Wiley & Sons.