DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Occupants' Visual Sensitivity According to the Illuminance Fluctuations of the Office Space

사무공간의 조도 변화에 따른 재실자의 시각적 민감도 분석

  • Ryu, Ji-Hye (Convergence Institute of Construction, Environmental and Energy Engineering, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Kim, Sung-Kyung (Convergence Institute of Construction, Environmental and Energy Engineering, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Kim, In-Hye (Strategy Part, NED) ;
  • Hong, Won-Hwa (School of Architectural, Civil, Environmental and Energy Engineering, Kyungpook National University)
  • 류지혜 (경북대 건설환경에너지융합기술원) ;
  • 김성경 (경북대 건설환경에너지융합기술원) ;
  • 김인혜 (네드 친환경계획전략) ;
  • 홍원화 (경북대 건설환경에너지공학부)
  • Received : 2022.10.28
  • Accepted : 2023.03.09
  • Published : 2023.04.30

Abstract

From the perspective of a lighting user, changes in illuminance can be recognized and visual fatigue increases as the range of change increases while visual satisfaction decreases. In this study, when the indoor illuminance level was controlled with four set illuminance levels of 300lx, 400lx, 500lx, and 700lx, the visual comfort of lighting users was analyzed as it relates to the measured illuminance value, illuminance preference, eye fatigue, and sensibility based on the brightness questionnaire. Visual sensitivity was derived from the change in the perceived brightness response of a lighting user according to the change in illuminance. As a result of the visual comfort analysis, the illuminance preference desired by occupants differed according to the set illuminance. The lower the setting illuminance, the clearer the tendency to prefer bright illuminance. There was a difference in the degree of eye fatigue affected by various factors. In the case of perceived brightness, it was investigated that as the set illuminance was higher, the perceived brightness at the same overall illuminance was relatively dark. In the case of the set illuminance 700lx, it was found that the illuminance was intuitively perceived as bright. As a result of the occupant's sensitivity analysis according to the change in illuminance, it revealed an illuminance change of 74.9lx (300lx), illuminance change of 63lx (400lx), illuminance change of 111.7lx (500lx), and illuminance change of 51.2lx (700lx). In this case, it was found that the lighting user could visually perceive the change in brightness for the first time. As a result of deriving visual sensitivity through regression analysis, it revealed that the higher the setting illuminance, the lower the visual sensitivity.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

이 논문은 정부(과학기술정보통신부)의 재원으로 한국연구재단의 지원을 받아 수행된 연구임 (No. NRF-2022R1C1C2007215). 이 논문은 2022년도 정부(교육부)의 재원으로 한국연구재단의 지원을 받아 수행된 기초연구사업임 (No. 2022R1A6A3A01087255).

References

  1. Baik, Y., & Kim, S. (2020). The prediction of lighting user's visual satisfaction for illuminance fluctuations in a small private office space. Journal of Korean Society of Living Environmental System, 27, 752-760. https://doi.org/10.21086/ksles.2020.12.27.6.752
  2. Boubekri, M. (2008). Daylighting, Architecture and Health. Building Design Strategies. 1st ed., Amsterdam, Boston, London, Architectural Press, 87.
  3. Boyce, P.R., Veitch, J.A., Newsham, G.R., Jones, C.C., Heerwagen, J., Myer, M., & Hunter, C.M. (2006). Occupant use of switching and dimming controls in offices. Lighting Research & Technology, 38(4), 358-376. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477153506070994
  4. Fakhari, M., & Fayaz, R. (2021). Somayeh Asadi, Lighting preferences in office spaces concerning the indoor thermal environment. Frontiers of Architectural Research, 10(3), 639-651. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foar.2021.03.003
  5. Grynning, S., Time, B., & Matusiak, B. (2014). Solar shading control strategies in cold climates heating, cooling demand and daylight availability in office spaces. Solar Energy, 107, 182-194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2014.06.007
  6. Kim, I.H., Kim, S.K., & Hong, W.H. (2020). A study on the proper illuminance considering the task amenity of the occupant in the office space, Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea Structure & Construct, 36(3), 159-167.
  7. Kim, S. (2010). The Influence of illuminance variation by a daylight dimming control system on visual comfort under clear sky conditions, Korea Journal of Air-Conditioning and Refrigeration Engineering, 22(8), 553-561.
  8. Kim, S., & Kim, J. (2007). Influence of light fluctuation on occupant visual perception, Building and Environment, 42(8), 2888-2899. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2006.10.033
  9. Kim, S., & Mistrick, R. (2001). Recommended daylight conditions for photosensor system calibration in a small office, The Journal of the Illuminating Engineering Society of North America, 176-188.
  10. Kim, S., & Song, K. (2007). Determining photosensor conditions of a daylight dimming control system using different double-skin envelope configuration, Indoor and Built Environment, 16, 411-425. https://doi.org/10.1177/1420326X07082497
  11. Kwong. Q.J. (2020). Light level, visual comfort and lighting energy savings potential in a green-certified high-rise building. Journal of Building Engineering, 29, 101198.
  12. Lee, E., DiBartolomeo, D., & Selkowitz, S. (1999). The effect of venetian blinds on daylight photoelectric control performance, The Journal of Illuminating Engineering Society of North America, 3-23.
  13. Lee, J., Moon, J., & Kim, S. (2014). Analysis of occupants' visual perception to refine indoor lighting environment for office tasks. Energies, 7, 4116-4139. https://doi.org/10.3390/en7074116
  14. Lee, Y. (2002). A Study on the Lighting Plan of Office Space According to the Social Variation : Focused on the Application of Preset Dimmer System, Thesis, Konkuk University.
  15. Mistrick, R., Chen, C., Bierman, A. & Felt, D. (2000). Comparison of photosensor-controlled electronic dimming systems in a small office, The Journal of Illuminating Engineering Society of North America, 66-80.
  16. Newsham, G., & Veitch, J. (2001). Lighting quality recommendations for VDT offices. A new method of derivation. Lighting Research & Technology, 33(2), 97-113. https://doi.org/10.1177/136578280103300205
  17. Reinhart, C., & Fitz, A.. (2006). Findings from a survey on the current use of daylight simulations in building design. Energy and Buildings, 38(7), 824-835. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2006.03.012
  18. Veitch, J.A., & Newsham, G.R. (2000). Preferred luminous conditions in open-plan offices. Research and practice recommendations. Lighting Research & Technology, 32(4), 199-212.  https://doi.org/10.1177/096032710003200404