DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

비대칭 단면을 가지는 매입형 합성기둥의 압축-휨 강도 평가에 대한 실무적 접근 방법

Practical Approach for Evaluation of Axial-Flexural Strength of Encased Composite Columns with Asymmetric Cross-Sections

  • 김경태 ((주)창민우구조컨설탄트) ;
  • 설동현 ((주)창민우구조컨설탄트) ;
  • 김종호 ((주)창민우구조컨설탄트)
  • 투고 : 2023.01.06
  • 심사 : 2023.03.29
  • 발행 : 2023.04.30

초록

In the process of embedding a steel column in an excavated hole during the top-down construction, it often occurs that the geometric center of the encased column and the center of the steel core is misaligned. In the case of an asymmetric composite section where the steel is not in the center, the compression-bending strength is different due to the effect of eccentricity, but there is not much data that engineers can refer to. Based on the design formulae for symmetric composite sections provided in the current KSSC Composite Structural Manual, in order to reflect the effect of asymmetric sections, this paper proposes to add points approximating the P-M interaction diagram and provides formulae for the axial forces and moments of each point. For verification, the error rate was reviewed for 200 cases of sections that depend on the amount of steel, column size, material strength, and eccentricity. As a result of examining the error, it was found that the unconservative error decreased as the eccentricity increased. This tendency can also be confirmed in the P-M interaction curve according to the eccentricity of the example cross section.

키워드

과제정보

본 연구는 국토교통부 디지털 기반 건축시공 및 안전감리 기술개발 사업의 연구비지원 (RS-2022-00143493)에 의해 수행되었습니다.

참고문헌

  1. American Concrete Institute. (2008). Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete (ACI 318-08) and Commentary.
  2. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport. (2019). Korea Design Standard 41 (KDS 41).
  3. American Institute of Steel Construction. (2010). Specification for Structural Steel Buildings.
  4. European Committee for standardization. (2005). Eurocode 4: Design of composite steel and concrete structures.
  5. Korean Society of Steel Construction. (2016). KBC 2016 Design Manual of Composite Structures.
  6. Roik, K., & Bergmann, R. (1985). Composite Columns-Design and Examples for Construction. Composite and mixed construction, 267-78.
  7. Roik, K., & Bergmann, R. (1990). Design method for composite columns with unsymmetrical cross-sections, Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 15(1-2), 153-168. https://doi.org/10.1016/0143-974X(90)90046-J
  8. Chiorean, C. G., (2010). Computerised interaction diagrams and moment capacity contours for composite steel-concrete cross-sections, Engineering Structures, 32, 3734-3757. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.08.019
  9. Chen, S., Teng, J. G., & Chan, Siu-Lai. (2001). Design of Biaxially Loaded Short Composite Columns of Arbitrary Section, Journal of Structural Engineering-asce - J STRUCT ENG-ASCE, 127.
  10. Lai, B. L., Liew, J. Y. R., & Li, S. (2018). Finite element analysis of concrete-encased steel composite columns with off-center steel section, 12th international conference on 'Advances in Steel-Concrete Composite Structures' - ASCCS 2018.
  11. Behnam, A., & Denavit, M. (2020). Plastic stress distribution method for predicting interaction strength of steel-concrete composite cross sections. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 170.
  12. Lubas, P., & Silva, V. (2016). A general method for designing non-symmetrical composite steel and concrete columns, Rem Revista Escola de Minas, 69, 273-279.
  13. Sousa, J. J., & Caldas, R. (2005). Numerical Analysis of Composite Steel-Concrete Columns of Arbitrary Cross Section, Journal of Structural Engineering-asce - J STRUCT ENG-ASCE, 131.
  14. Papanikolaou, V. (2012). Analysis of arbitrary composite sections in biaxial bending and axial load, Computers & Structures, 98-99, 33-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2012.02.004
  15. Liu, S., Liu, Y., & Chan, S. (2012). Advanced analysis of hybrid steel and concrete frames: Part 1: Cross-section analysis technique and second-order analysis, Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 70, 326-336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2011.09.003