DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Detachable zirconia prosthesis using Milled bar and ADD-TOC attachment in partial edentulous mandible: A case report

하악 부분 무치악 환자에서 Milled-bar와 ADD-TOC 부착 장치를 이용한 탈착 가능한 지르코니아 보철물 수복 증례

  • Min-Sung Sohn (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University) ;
  • Jung-Bo Huh (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University)
  • 손민성 (부산대학교 치의학전문대학원 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 허중보 (부산대학교 치의학전문대학원 치과보철학교실)
  • Received : 2022.12.14
  • Accepted : 2023.01.06
  • Published : 2023.01.31

Abstract

Implant overdentures are widely used as a treatment method to restore oral function in completely edentulous or partially edentulous patients with severe bone resorption. Using a milled bar, it is mechanically advantageous as the implant fixtures are splinted. Applying additional attachments to the bar has the advantage of dispersing the stress applied to the implant. In this case, a patient who used implant overdentures using 4 implants wanted to fabricate a new prosthesis due to repeated fractures of the denture and weakened retention. Milled bar with ADD-TOC attachment and zirconia prosthesis were fabricated by CAD-CAM method and mechanically and aesthetically satisfactory results were obtained.

임플란트 피개의치는 골 흡수가 심한 완전 무치악 또는 부분 무치악 환자의 구강 기능 회복을 위한 치료 방법으로 널리 사용되고 있다. Milled bar를 이용한 임플란트 피개의치의 경우 bar가 임플란트 고정체를 연결 고정하므로 기계적으로 유리하며, bar에 추가적으로 부착 장치를 적용하면 임플란트에 가해지는 응력을 분산시킬 수 있다는 이점이 있다. 본 증례에서는 4개의 임플란트를 사용하여 임플란트 피개의치를 사용하던 환자가 의치의 반복적인 파절과 유지력의 약화로 인해 새로운 보철물 제작을 원하여 ADD-TOC 부착 장치가 부착된 milled bar와 탈착 가능한 지르코니아 보철물을 CAD-CAM 방식으로 제작하였고, 이를 통해 기능적, 심미적으로 만족할 만한 결과를 얻었다.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

이 논문은 부산대학교 기본연구지원사업(2년)에 의하여 연구되었음.

References

  1. DeBoer J. Edentulous implants: overdenture versus fixed. J Prosthet Dent 1993;69:386-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(93)90186-R
  2. Ohkubo C, Kobayashi M, Suzuki Y, Hosoi T. Effect of implant support on distal-extension removable partial dentures: in vivo assessment. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2008;23:1095-101.
  3. Narhi TO, Geertman ME, Hevinga M, Abdo H, Kalk W. Changes in the edentulous maxilla in persons wearing implant-retained mandibular overdentures. J Prosthet Dent 2000;84:43-9. https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2000.107113
  4. Trakas T, Michalakis K, Kang K, Hirayama H. Attachment systems for implant retained overdentures: a literature review. Implant Dent 2006;15:24-34. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.id.0000202419.21665.36
  5. Watson CJ, Tinsley D, Sharma S. Implant complications and failures: the complete overdenture. Dent Update 2001;28:234-8, 240. https://doi.org/10.12968/denu.2001.28.5.234
  6. Bakke M, Holm B, Gotfredsen K. Masticatory function and patient satisfaction with implant-supported mandibular overdentures: a prospective 5-year study. Int J Prosthodont 2002;15:575-81.
  7. Naert I, Gizani S, Vuylsteke M, van Steenberghe D. A 5-year randomized clinical trial on the influence of splinted and unsplinted oral implants in the mandibular overdenture therapy. Part I: Peri-implant outcome. Clin Oral Implants Res 1998;9:170-7. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1998.090304.x
  8. Sadowsky SJ. The implant-supported prosthesis for the edentulous arch: design considerations. J Prosthet Dent 1997;78:28-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(97)70084-2
  9. Ercoli C, Graser GN, Tallents RH, Hagan ME. Alternative procedure for making a metal suprastructure in a milled bar implant-supported overdenture. J Prosthet Dent 1998;80:253-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(98)70120-9
  10. Walton JN, MacEntee MI, Glick N. One-year prosthetic outcomes with implant overdentures: a randomized clinical trial. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2002;17:391-8.
  11. Chae SK, Cho WT, Choi JW, Bae EB, Bae JH, Bae GH, Huh JB. Comparison of retentive force and wear pattern of Locator® and ADD-TOC attachments combined with CAD-CAM milled bar. J Adv Prosthodont 2022;14:12-21. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2022.14.1.12
  12. Misch CE, Goodacre CJ, Finley JM, Misch CM, Marinbach M, Dabrowsky T, English CE, Kois JC, Cronin RJ Jr. Consensus conference panel report: crown-height space guidelines for implant dentistry-part 2. Implant Dent 2006;15:113-21. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.id.0000217907.18396.18
  13. Bulaqi HA, Mousavi Mashhadi M, Safari H, Samandari MM, Geramipanah F. Effect of increased crown height on stress distribution in short dental implant components and their surrounding bone: A finite element analysis. J Prosthet Dent 2015;113:548-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.11.007
  14. Bortolini S, Natali A, Franchi M, Coggiola A, Consolo U. Implant-retained removable partial dentures: an 8-year retrospective study. J Prosthodont 2011;20:168-72. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2011.00700.x
  15. Zitzmann NU, Marinello CP. Treatment plan for restoring the edentulous maxilla with implant-supported restorations: removable overdenture versus fixed partial denture design. J Prosthet Dent 1999;82:188-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(99)70155-1