DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Improved Resource Allocation Model for Reducing Interference among Secondary Users in TV White Space for Broadband Services

  • Marco P. Mwaimu (The School of Computational and Communication Sciences and Engineering, The Nelson Mandela African Institution of Science and Technology) ;
  • Mike Majham (The School of Computational and Communication Sciences and Engineering, The Nelson Mandela African Institution of Science and Technology) ;
  • Ronoh Kennedy (The Technical University of Kenya ) ;
  • Kisangiri Michael (The School of Computational and Communication Sciences and Engineering, The Nelson Mandela African Institution of Science and Technology) ;
  • Ramadhani Sinde (The School of Computational and Communication Sciences and Engineering, The Nelson Mandela African Institution of Science and Technology)
  • Received : 2023.04.05
  • Published : 2023.04.30

Abstract

In recent years, the Television White Space (TVWS) has attracted the interest of many researchers due to its propagation characteristics obtainable between 470MHz and 790MHz spectrum bands. The plenty of unused channels in the TV spectrum allows the secondary users (SUs) to use the channels for broadband services especially in rural areas. However, when the number of SUs increases in the TVWS wireless network the aggregate interference also increases. Aggregate interferences are the combined harmful interferences that can include both co-channel and adjacent interferences. The aggregate interference on the side of Primary Users (PUs) has been extensively scrutinized. Therefore, resource allocation (power and spectrum) is crucial when designing the TVWS network to avoid interferences from Secondary Users (SUs) to PUs and among SUs themselves. This paper proposes a model to improve the resource allocation for reducing the aggregate interface among SUs for broadband services in rural areas. The proposed model uses joint power and spectrum hybrid Firefly algorithm (FA), Genetic algorithm (GA), and Particle Swarm Optimization algorithm (PSO) which is considered the Co-channel interference (CCI) and Adjacent Channel Interference (ACI). The algorithm is integrated with the admission control algorithm so that; there is a possibility to remove some of the SUs in the TVWS network whenever the SINR threshold for SUs and PU are not met. We considered the infeasible system whereby all SUs and PU may not be supported simultaneously. Therefore, we proposed a joint spectrum and power allocation with an admission control algorithm whose better complexity and performance than the ones which have been proposed in the existing algorithms in the literature. The performance of the proposed algorithm is compared using the metrics such as sum throughput, PU SINR, algorithm running time and SU SINR less than threshold and the results show that the PSOFAGA with ELGR admission control algorithm has best performance compared to GA, PSO, FA, and FAGAPSO algorithms.

Keywords

References

  1. Rahman, M. and A. Saifullah, A comprehensive survey on networking over TV white spaces. Pervasive and Mobile Computing, 2019. 59: p. 101072. 
  2. Lamola, M., et al. Head to Head Battle of TV White Space and WiFi for Connecting Developing Regions. in e-Infrastructure and e-Services for Developing Countries: 8th International Conference, AFRICOMM 2016, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso, December 6-7, 2016, Proceedings. 2017. Springer. 
  3. Ronoh, K.K., et al., A Survey of Resource Allocation in TV White Space Networks. JCM, 2019. 14(12): p. 1180-1190.  https://doi.org/10.12720/jcm.14.12.1180-1190
  4. Selen, Y. and J. Kronander. Optimizing power limits for white space devices under a probability constraint on aggregated interference. in 2012 IEEE International Symposium on Dynamic Spectrum Access Networks. 2012. IEEE. 
  5. Gong, X., S.A. Vorobyov, and C. Tellambura, Joint bandwidth and power allocation with admission control in wireless multi-user networks with and without relaying. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 2011. 59(4): p. 1801-1813.  https://doi.org/10.1109/TSP.2010.2104146
  6. Kennedy, R., O. Tonny, and K. George, Novel Resource Allocation Algorithm for TV White Space Networks Using Hybrid Firefly Algorithm. International Journal of Computer (IJC), 2019. 32(1): p. 34-53. 
  7. Kennedy, R., et al. Firefly algorithm based power control in wireless TV white space network. in 2017 IEEE AFRICON. 2017. IEEE. 
  8. Arora, S. and S. Singh, The firefly optimization algorithm: convergence analysis and parameter selection. International Journal of Computer Applications, 2013. 69(3). 
  9. Li, Y., et al., QoS-aware admission control and resource allocation in underlay device-to-device spectrum-sharing networks. IEEE Journal on selected areas in communications, 2016. 34(11): p. 2874-2886.  https://doi.org/10.1109/JSAC.2016.2614942
  10. Xue, Z. and L. Wang. Geolocation database based resource sharing among multiple device-to-device links in TV white space. in 2015 International Conference on Wireless Communications & Signal Processing (WCSP). 2015. IEEE. 
  11. Gu, H.-Y., C.-Y. Yang, and B. Fong, Low-complexity centralized joint power and admission control in cognitive radio networks. IEEE Communications Letters, 2009. 13(6): p. 420-422.  https://doi.org/10.1109/LCOMM.2009.082173
  12. Xue, Z., et al. Coexistence among Device-to-Device communications in TV white space based on geolocation database. in 2014 International Workshop on High Mobility Wireless Communications. 2014. IEEE. 
  13. Ronoh, K.K., G. Kamucha, and T.K. Omwansa, Comparison of Hybrid Firefly Algorithms for Power Allocation in a TV White Space Network. International Journal of Computer Applications, 2019. 975: p. 8887. 
  14. Yang, X.-S., Nature-inspired metaheuristic algorithms. 2010: Luniver press.
  15. Fister, I., et al., A comprehensive review of firefly algorithms. Swarm and Evolutionary Computation, 2013. 13: p. 34-46.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.swevo.2013.06.001
  16. Anumandla, K.K., et al. Spectrum allocation in cognitive radio networks using firefly algorithm. in International Conference on Swarm, Evolutionary, and Memetic Computing. 2013. Springer. 
  17. Shrestha, A. and A. Mahmood, Improving genetic algorithm with fine-tuned crossover and scaled architecture. Journal of Mathematics, 2016. 2016. 
  18. Carr, J., An introduction to genetic algorithms. Senior Project, 2014. 1(40): p. 7. 
  19. Lopez, R.B., et al. Genetic algorithm aided transmit power control in cognitive radio networks. in 2014 9th International Conference on Cognitive Radio Oriented Wireless Networks and Communications (CROWNCOM). 2014. IEEE. 
  20. Varade, P.S. and Y. Ravinder. Optimal spectrum allocation in cognitive radio using genetic algorithm. in 2014 Annual IEEE India Conference (INDICON). 2014. IEEE. 
  21. Chen, S., et al. Genetic algorithm-based optimization for cognitive radio networks. in 2010 IEEE Sarnoff Symposium. 2010. IEEE. 
  22. Supraja, P., V. Gayathri, and R. Pitchai, Optimized neural network for spectrum prediction using genetic algorithm in cognitive radio networks. Cluster Computing, 2019. 22(1): p. 157-163.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10586-018-1978-5
  23. Eberhart, R. and J. Kennedy. Particle swarm optimization. in Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on neural networks. 1995. Citeseer. 
  24. Kennedy, J. and R. Eberhart. Particle swarm optimization. in Proceedings of ICNN'95-international conference on neural networks. 1995. IEEE. 
  25. Shi, Y. and R. Eberhart. A modified particle swarm optimizer. in 1998 IEEE international conference on evolutionary computation proceedings. IEEE world congress on computational intelligence (Cat. No. 98TH8360). 1998. IEEE. 
  26. Motiian, S., M. Aghababaie, and H. Soltanian-Zadeh. Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) of power allocation in cognitive radio systems with interference constraints. in 2011 4th IEEE International Conference on Broadband Network and Multimedia Technology. 2011. IEEE. 
  27. Behera, S.B. and D. Seth. Resource allocation for cognitive radio network using particle swarm optimization. in 2015 2nd International Conference on Electronics and Communication Systems (ICECS). 2015. IEEE. 
  28. Jie, Z. and L. Tiejun, Spectrum Allocation in Cognitive Radio with Particle Swarm Optimization Algorithm. Chinese Scientific Papers Online, 2012: p. 201201-658. 
  29. Mishra, S., et al., Spectrum allocation in cognitive radio: A PSO-based approach. Periodica Polytechnica Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, 2019. 63(1): p. 23-29.  https://doi.org/10.3311/PPee.13074
  30. Nie, N. and C. Comaniciu, Adaptive channel allocation spectrum etiquette for cognitive radio networks. Mobile networks and applications, 2006. 11(6): p. 779-797. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11036-006-0049-y