대한건축학회논문집 (Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea)

  • 제39권6호
  • /
  • Pages.27-38
  • /
  • 2023
  • /
  • 2733-6239(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2733-6247(eISSN)
대한건축학회 (Architectural Institute of Korea)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

도시형 공유주거에 대한 세대별 인식과 요구 특성 분석

Analysis of Perceptions and Needs Characteristics by Generation for Urban Shared Housing

  • 주운수 (중앙대 공간디자인전공 ) ;
  • 이소연 (중앙대 실내환경디자인전공 ) ;
  • 김영주 (중앙대 주거환경학과)
  • Zhou, Yunxiu (Dept. of Space Design, Chung-Ang University) ;
  • Lee, Soyeon (Dept. of Housing & Interior Design, Chung-Ang University) ;
  • Kim, Youngjoo (Dept. of Housing & Interior Design, Chung-Ang University)
  • 투고 : 2022.11.04
  • 심사 : 2023.05.22
  • 발행 : 2023.06.30
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

The study aims to compare the perceptions and needs of urban shared housing according to different age group, and conducted a survey as a mean of analysis. Survey participants were those living in Seoul and Gyeonggi area in South Korea, who responded to an online questionnaire. For comparative analysis by generation, survey-takers in their 20s and 30s were classified in the "Youth" group. those in their 40s and 50s in the "Middle-age" group, and those in their 60s and older in the "Elderly" group. According to research findings, the greatest generational difference was in the survey participants perception of relationships with neighbors. Preference towards friendliness and interaction with neighbors increased with older age group, while youths wanted less interaction with neighbors. In the case of youths and middle-aged participants, they saw urban shared housing as a short-term residence type, living there for only a short period of time in the form of chonsei (multi-year, large deposit rental method unique to South Korea). On the other hand, while some elderly participants shared similar thoughts as their younger counterparts, others wanted to spend the rest of their lives there by having ownership over such housing type. Furthermore, regarding the physical space of urban shared housing, small households across all age groups wanted to maintain similar personal spaces, but showed differences in their needs for communal spaces. Older generations preferred to have leisure-related spaces, while youths sought after convenient and practical facilities. Existing studies on shared housing have been mainly carried out with fragmentary case studies of one age group or a specific target. In this study, the difference in perception of shared housing for various age groups will be compared together, and it will be a meaningful data when planning or developing urban shared housing in the future.

키워드

과제정보

이성과는 정부(과학기술정보통신부)의 지원으로 한국연구재단의 지원을 받아 수행된 연구임(No.NRF-2021R1A2C2009201).

참고문헌

  1. Byun, H. M., & Han, J. W. (2015). Case studies on the characteristics of shared housing for each type, Korean Institute of Interior Design Journal, 17(1), 25-28.
  2. Choi, J. S., & Oh, D. H. (2015). Activating schemes introducing share house for the senior from the perspective of the providers. Housing Studies Review, 23(3), 89-109.
  3. Geonggi Research Institute. (2022). Supply of large-scaled shared housing, let's prepare properly. Issue & Diagnosis. No.491.
  4. Jeong, K. (2021). Application of the artificial neural network model to an analysis of the factors affecting the intention of young single persons living in non-housing accommodations to move to a shared house, Korean Association for Housing Studies Review, 29(2), 37-58 https://doi.org/10.24957/hsr.2021.29.2.37
  5. Jeong, D. W., Hong, H. O., & Jee, E. Y. (2015). A study on recognition and demands about mixed-generation house-sharing. Journal of Families and Better Life, 33(6), 65-75.
  6. Kim, B. S., & Lee, D. S. (2021). The effects of residential characteristics of elderly single person households on residential satisfaction - comparing elderly households to ordinary households -, residential environment : Journal of the Residential Environment Institute of Korea, 19(3), 349-360. https://doi.org/10.22313/reik.2021.19.3.349
  7. Kim, Y. J., & Gu, H. J. (2019). Community housing policy alternative for one-person households, Seoul Foundation of Women & Family, 10, 67-84.
  8. Lee, M. S., & Suh, K. S. (2016). Analysis on management about the intergenerational homeshare by senior-young student-focusing on 4 districts in Seoul, Korea. Korean Institute of Interior Design Journal, 25(3), 90-101.
  9. McCamant, K., & Durrett, C. (2011). Creating cohousing building sustainable communities, New Society Publishers, 7th ed., New Society Publishers, 1-338.
  10. Seo, E., & Lee, J. (2022). Is co-housing an alternative housing for young single-household : A study on the comparison and analysis of social capital and residential satisfaction by housing type, Journal of the Korean Housing Association, 33(2), 72.
  11. Son, C. H., & Jang, H. D. (2020). A study on the recognition of problems in urban and residential environment and the management alternatives of neighborhood units in korean government officials, Residential Environment : Journal of the Residential Environment Institute of Korea, 18(3), 265-283. https://doi.org/10.22313/reik.2020.18.3.265
  12. Yoo, M. S. (2017). Satisfaction of Residents Living and their Relationship with Local Communities in Cohousing of Seoul. thesis, University of Seoul, 41.