Journal of Christian Education in Korea (기독교교육논총)

The Korean Society of Christian Religious Education (한국기독교교육학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the Future Competency Education of Christian Alternative Schools Using Delphi Analysis Techniques

델파이 기법을 활용한 기독교대안학교의 미래 역량교육에 관한 연구

  • Received : 2023.06.04
  • Accepted : 2023.06.29
  • Published : 2023.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Competency means 'the ability to do something', and competency-based education means 'the process of education based on the concept of competency'. Competency-based education is generally implemented in general education. However, competency-based education has not yet been actively conducted in the field of Christian education. In particular, it has not been established academically on what competencies Christian alternative schools provide in common. Most of the previous studies related to competency-based education in Christian education are related to competency-based education conducted by Christian universities. Research related to competency in Christian alternative schools is mainly related to the professionalism of teachers or the ideology of Christian alternative schools. In other words, there are few specific studies on what kind of competency they provide to students attending Christian alternative schools. Therefore, this study aims to understand the reality of competency-based education conducted by Christian alternative schools using Delphi analysis techniques. Through this study, four goals and 20 competency elements of competency education pursued by Christian alternative schools were found. By categorizing the goals and elements of competency education, it can be divided into relationships with God, relationships with oneself, and relationships with others and the world. In conclusion, it was suggested that Christian alternative schools should provide education that pursues the universal purpose of Christian education based on specificity and reflect the goals and elements of competency education in the curriculum.

연구 목적 : 본 연구의 목적은 기독교대안학교가 공통적으로 지향하는 역량교육의 목적이 무엇이고 그러한 교육을 통해 길러주고자 하는 역량의 요소가 무엇인지를 합의적 의사결정 방법인 델파이 방법을 통해 제시하는 것이다. 연구 내용 및 방법 : 역량은 '무엇인가를 할 수 있는 능력'을 의미하며, 역량기반 교육은 '역량의 개념을 기반으로 한 교육의 과정'을 의미한다. 일반교육에서 역량기반 교육은 보편적으로 시행되고 있다. 그러나 기독교교육의 영역에서는 아직까지 역량기반 교육이 활발하게 이루어지지 못하고 있다. 특히 기독교대안학교에서 공통적으로 어떠한 역량을 길러주는 교육을 하고 있는지에 대하여 학문적으로 정립되지 않고 있다. 기독교교육에서 역량기반 교육과 관련된 선행연구는 대부분 기독교 대학에서 실시하고 있는 역량기반 교육과 관련되어 있다. 기독교대안학교에서의 역량과 관련된 연구는 주로 교사들의 전문성이나 기독교대안학교의 이념과 관련된 연구들이다. 즉 기독교대안학교에 다니는 학생들에게 어떠한 역량을 길러주는 교육을 하고 있는지에 대한 구체적인 연구는 거의 없다. 따라서 본 연구에서는 델파이 분석 기법을 활용하여 기독교 대안학교에서 실시하고 있는 역량중심 교육의 실체가 무엇인지 파악하고자 한다. 특히 기독교대안학교들이 공통적으로 가지고 있는 역량교육의 목표가 무엇이고 역량의 요소는 무엇인지 찾아내서 향후 기독교대안학교의 질적인 성장에 기여하고자 한다. 결론 및 제언 : 본 연구를 통해 기독교대안학교에서 추구하는 역량교육의 목표 4개와 역량요소 20개를 발견하였다. 역량교육의 목표와 요소를 유형화하면 하나님과의 관계, 자신과의 관계, 타인 및 세상과의 관계로 구분할 수 있다. 결론적으로 기독교대안학교가 특수성을 기반으로 하는 기독교교육의 보편적 목적을 추구하는 교육을 해야 하며 교육과정에 역량교육의 목표와 요소를 반영하여야 할 것을 제안하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. Kang, Y. T. (2015). Key competencies needed in a future society and tasks of a Christian school. Faith & Scholarship, 20, 7-37.
  2. Kagn, Y. T., Kim, H, K., Park, S. J., Yoo, J. B., Ham, Y. J. (2020). Education for rest. Seoul: Education for rest.
  3. Kang, Y. T., Park, S. J., Ham, Y. J. (2019). The identity and role of Christian parents in Korea. Seoul: YeYoung Communications.
  4. Institute of Christian school education. (2007). Hope planting education, Christian alternative school guide. Seoul: YeYoung Communications.
  5. Kim, D. J., Kim, S. Y. (2017). Understanding and issues of core competencies and competency-based education in university education. The Journal of Core Competency Education Research, 2, 23-45.
  6. Kim, B. W. (2015). Delphi analysis method. Seoul: Kim's institute for information strategy.
  7. Kim, W, G. (2017). The principles to the curriculum development fortifying Christian competencies. Korea Reformed Journal, 41, 101-131.
  8. Park, D. S. (2020). Educational research method. Seoul: Educational Science.
  9. Park, S. J., Kim, C. H., Kim, J. W., Kang, Y. T. (2015). Prospects for Christian alternative schools. Seoul: YeYoung Communications.
  10. Park, S, J., Lee, G. J., Choi, Y. J., Kang, Y. T. (2017). The Finances of Christian alternative schools. Seoul: YeYoung Communications.
  11. Park, S, J., Lee, J. C. (2019). Everything you want to know about Christian alternative schools. Seoul: Bukuku.
  12. Park, S. J., Lee, J. C. (2022). Ponder the future of Christian alternative schools. Seoul: Education for rest.
  13. Park, S. J., Cho, I. J., Kang, Y. T., Lee, E. S. (2012). The educational achievement of Christian alternative schools. Seoul: YeYoung Communications.
  14. Park, E. S. (2013). A development on Christian competency educational model and applying in the college. Korea Society for Christian Education and Information Technology, 37, 93-121
  15. Seo, M. K. (2020). A study on Christian educational implications for 6 key competencies of 2015 revised national curriculum. A Journal of Christian Education in Korea, 63, 221-253.
  16. Lee, S. E. (2019). Characteristics of a new competency education framework in OECD Education 2030 project and its implication to Korea's 2015 revised curriculum. Korean Journal of Comparative Education, 29, 123-154.
  17. Lee, S. A., Nam, S. W., Lee, E. C. (2020). A study on the development and validation of an assessment tool of KBU core competency. A Journal of Christian Education in Korea, 62, 187-225.
  18. Lee, S. I. (2018). The applicability of the competency-based education at a Christian university: A case of Asian United Theological University. ACTS Theological Journal, 35, 93-124. https://doi.org/10.19114/atj.35.3
  19. Lee, E. S. (2020). The meaning and growth of teacher professionalism recognized by Christian alternative school teachers. A Journal of Christian Education in Korea, 63, 183-219.
  20. Lee, E. S., Jay, Y. K. (2016). Development of competency-based education and its operating system in a Christian higher education: A case of Handong Global University. Faith & Scholarship, 21, 177-207.
  21. Lee, J. S. (2001). Delphi method. Seoul: Educational Science.
  22. Lee, J. T. (2001). The crisis, causes, and alternatives of school education. Educational Theory and Practice, 11, 7-53.
  23. Jung, J. S. (2000). Christian education curriculum. Seoul: A Publishing Department of Presbyterian Church in Korea.
  24. Cho, S. K. (2014). Future tasks of Christian schools on the basis of Christian worldview. A Journal of Christian Education in Korea, 38, 1-26.
  25. Ji, M. K., Kim, J. H. (2020). The case study on the characteristics of classroom community in a Christian alternative school: in aspects of activity, relationship and value. A Journal of Christian Education in Korea, 64, 445-477.
  26. Jin, M. S. (2016). Can core competencies be a new answer to the old question of education. The Journal of Core Competency Education Research, 1, 1-24.
  27. Han, C, K. (2008). Theology of Christian education. Seoul: Kidok Hankyo.
  28. Ham, Y. J. (2015a). The ideology and vision of Christian alternative schools. Research on Christian Education, 24, 9-36.
  29. Ham, Y. J. (2015b). A study on teachers' perception of the Christian alternative school education. Gospel and Education, 18, 43-77.
  30. Ham, Y. J. (2015c). A qualitative study on the educational performance of Christian alternative school graduates. Theology and Praxis, 47, 459-483. https://doi.org/10.14387/jkspth.2015.47.459
  31. Ham, Y. J. (2015d). A study on the narrative of graduates on the education system of Christian alternative schools. A 2015 collection of materials of the Korean society of Christian education summer conference, 210-230.
  32. Ham, Y. J. et. al. (2020). I am a Christian alternative school teacher. Seoul: Education for rest.
  33. Heo, J. W. (2021). Understanding the competency-based education conceptual framework and presenting challenges through conditional exploration. The Journal of Core Competency Education Research, 10, 1-22.
  34. De Jong, N (1969). Education in the truth. Westminster, Nutley, N.J: Presbyterian and Reformed Pub. Co.
  35. Lawshe, C. H (1975). A qualitative approach to content validity. Personal Psychology, 28, 563-575. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1975.tb01393.x
  36. OECD (2018). The future of education and skills: Education 2030. Position Paper.
  37. Wolterstorff, N. (2014). Educating for Shalom. Shin. Y. S..Lee. M. K..Lee, H. M. Seoul: SFC. (original article published in 2004)