Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea (대한건축학회논문집)

Architectural Institute of Korea (대한건축학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Developing a Comprehensive Framework for Detailed Facility Planning in Office Building Grade Assessment

오피스 건물 등급 설정을 위한 세부 시설계획 평가 방안 제안

  • Kim, Dock-Hyun (PCM Headquarters Design Team, Kunwon Engineering) ;
  • Ye, Seong-Jun (Dept. of Architectural Engineering, Han University) ;
  • Lee, Kyung-Tae (Dept. of Architectural Engineering, Hanyang University) ;
  • Im, Jin-bin (Dept. of Architectural Engineering, Hanyang University) ;
  • Kim, Ju-Hyung (Dept. of Architectural Engineering, Hanyang University)
  • 김덕현 ((주)건축사사무소 건원엔지니어링 PCM본부 설계팀) ;
  • 예성준 (한양대 건축공학과) ;
  • 이경태 (한양대 건축공학과) ;
  • 임진빈 (한양대 건축공학과) ;
  • 김주형 (한양대 건축공학과)
  • Received : 2023.06.16
  • Accepted : 2023.08.18
  • Published : 2023.09.30
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

In managing office building assets, grading assessment plays a crucial role in making investment decisions. In Korea, the grading assessment of office buildings has been handled by private real estate companies, following an inconsistent and sporadic analysis method. Consequently, specific facility criteria for evaluating the grade of office buildings haven't been standardized. This lack of clarity can create confusion for both suppliers and investors seeking reliable building assets. This study aims to establish precise facility standards and provide a clear direction for distinctive grading assessments. To achieve this, the current evaluation criteria were redefined after validating the revised guidelines with industry practitioners. These redefined criteria were organized into 60 items, which were then verified through focus group interviews. To quantify these criteria, a scoring table was devised for each item using a 5-point Likert scale. Using this approach, a comprehensive scoring method was established and five rating systems for office buildings were proposed. By applying this approach to an actual case, it was confirmed that the evaluation closely aligned with real-world performance. This proposed evaluation method is anticipated to assist business operators in their planning efforts and aid tenants in making informed decisions when renting office spaces.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

이 연구는 2023년도 한국연구재단 연구비 지원에 의한 결과의 일부임. 과제번호: 2021R1A2C1095606.

References

  1. Baek, K. M. (2015). A Study on the impact of Green certification for Office Buildings Rent preferences: Focusing on the LEED certified offices, Thesis, Hongik University.
  2. BHP Korea, Samil PwC, & Korea Appraisal Board. (2003). Study report for the establishment of office building rating system.
  3. BOMA International. (2012). Experience Exchange Report.
  4. CBRE Korea. (2022). "CBRE_Office Leasing Flyer", September.
  5. Cho, H. H., & Choi, C. G. (2022). A study on the effect of age of office buildings by grade on effective net occupancy cost: focus on the central business district (CBD) of Seoul. The Journal of Korea Real Estate Analysts Association, 28(1), 21-35. https://doi.org/10.19172/KREAA.28.1.2
  6. Cho, K. M., Kim, J. W., & Kim, T. H. (2019). Decision support method for estimating monetary value of post-renovation office buildings, Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 16, 1103-1113.
  7. Choi, J. S. (2010). An analysis of impact factors affecting the office rental decision of tenants in three major areas in Seoul, Ph. D. Dissertation, Hanyang University.
  8. Jang, M. C., & Lee, H. D. (2008). The effects of service quality of large scale office building on tenant satisfaction, tenant loyalty and financial performance. Journal of KREAA, 14(1), 35-64.
  9. Jung, H. G., Han, Y. O., & Park, T. W. (2016). Exploratory factor analysis of the real estate asset management of small and medium-sized office buildings: focused on Seoul CBD small and medium-sized office buildings. Appraisal Studies, 15(1), 98-111.
  10. Kang, M. S., Lee, M. S., Chun, J. Y., & Lim, H. Y. (2003). A study on performance evaluation standard of office building and it's certification. Journal Of The Architectural Institute Of Korea Planning & Design, 19(3), 39-47.
  11. Keum, S. S. (2013). An Analysis of Classification & Determinants of Office Building Grade, Ph. D. Dissertation, Konkuk University.
  12. Keum, S. S., & Cho, J. H. (2013). An empirical study on classification criteria for office building grade in seoul. Seoul Studies, 14(2), 67-81. https://doi.org/10.23129/SEOULS.14.2.201306.67
  13. Kim, H. Y. (2016). A Study on the Practical Use of Special Building Services in Office Market: Focusing on Seoul Area, Thesis, Konkuk University.
  14. Kim, J. M. (2011). A development of the evaluation elements for the office buildings, Ph. D. Dissertation, Hanyang University.
  15. Kim, S. Y., Han, J. S., & Yoo, S. J. (2009). Study on purchasing behavior for investment in office buildings by domestic & foreign capital. The Korea Spatial Planning Review, 199-222.
  16. Krueger, R. A., & Casey, M. A. (2014). Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage publications.
  17. Kwon, T. W., Lee, K. T., Kim, J. H., & Kim, J. J. (2023). Proposal of hierarchical organization structure for negotiation consensus in multinational joint-client megaprojects: Case of US force relocation program in Korea. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 149(2), 05022019.
  18. Lim, D. O. (2018). A study on the effect of office building fire safety on the building asset value. Magazine of the SAREK, 47(2),44-49.
  19. Shin, H. J. (2021). Issues and prospects of the office market. Planning And Policy, (), 12-21.
  20. ShinYoung Asset. (2011). Office Market Report. 1-4Q.
  21. So, S. K., & Cho, J. H. (2018). The effect of eco-friendly characteristics on the price of office buildings. Journal of Real Estate Research, 28(2), 49-64.
  22. Yoon, K. S. (2020). A Study on the Determinants of Maintenance Cost in Office Building, Thesis, KonKuk University.
  23. Yoon, Y. S., & Lee, W. J. (2012). A study on establish of grades index for office buildings in Seoul, Journal of the Korea Facility management Association, 7(2), 23-31.