Animal Bioscience

  • 제36권12호
  • /
  • Pages.1806-1820
  • /
  • 2023
  • /
  • 2765-0189(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2765-0235(eISSN)
아세아태평양축산학회 (Asian Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparative genetic analysis of frequentist and Bayesian approach for reproduction, production and life time traits showing favourable association of age at first calving in Tharparkar cattle

  • 투고 : 2023.01.30
  • 심사 : 2023.05.17
  • 발행 : 2023.12.01
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Objective: The present study was aimed primarily for estimating various genetic parameters (heritability, genetic correlations) of reproduction (age at first calving [AFC], first service period [FSP]); production (first lactation milk, solid-not fat, and fat yield) and lifetime traits (lifetime milk yield, productive life [PL], herd life [HL]) in Tharparkar cattle to check the association of reproduction traits with lifetime traits through two different methods (Frequentist and Bayesian) for comparative purpose. Methods: Animal breeding data of Tharparkar cattle (n = 964) collected from Livestock farm unit of ICAR-NDRI Karnal for the period 1990 through 2019 were analyzed using a Frequentist least squares maximum likelihood method (LSML; Harvey, 1990) and a multi-trait Bayesian-Gibbs sampler approach (MTGSAM) for genetic correlations estimation of all the traits. Estimated breeding values of sires was obtained by BLUP and Bayesian analysis for the production traits. Results: Heritability estimates of most of the traits were medium to high with the LSML (0.20±0.44 to 0.49±0.71) and Bayesian approach (0.24±0.009 to 0.61±0.017), respectively. However, more reliable estimates were obtained using the Bayesian technique. A higher heritability estimate was obtained for AFC (0.61±0.017) followed by first lactation fat yield, first lactation solid-not fat yield, FSP, first lactation milk yield (FLMY), PL (0.60±0.013, 0.60±0.006, 0.57±0.024, 0.57±0.020, 0.42±0.025); while a lower estimate for HL (0.38±0.034) by MTGSAM approach. Genetic and phenotypic correlations were negative for AFC-PL, AFC-HL, FSP-PL, and FSP-HL (-0.59±0.19, -0.59±0.24, -0.38±0.101 and -0.34±0.076) by the multi-trait Bayesian analysis. Conclusion: Breed and traits of economic importance are important for selection decisions to ensure genetic gain in cattle breeding programs. Favourable genetic and phenotypic correlations of AFC with production and lifetime traits compared to that of FSP indicated better scope of AFC for indirect selection of life-time traits at an early age. This also indicated that the present Tharparkar cattle herd had sufficient genetic diversity through the selection of AFC for the improvement of first lactation production and lifetime traits.

키워드

과제정보

The authors would like to thank the Director, ICAR-NDRI, Karnal and Head of the Division for providing all the necessary help for the present study.

참고문헌

  1. Joshi NR, Phillips RW. Zebu cattle of India and Pakistan. Rome, Italy: FAO Agriculture Studies; 1953. pp. 146-51. 
  2. Khan RIN, Sahu AR, Malla WA, et al. Systems biology under heat stress in Indian cattle. Gene 2021;805:145908. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gene.2021.145908 
  3. Stojsin-Carter A, Mahboubi K, Costa NN, et al. Systemic and local anti-Mullerian hormone reflects differences in the reproduction potential of Zebu and European type cattle. Anim Reprod Sci 2016;167:51-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2016.02.003 
  4. Kuchekar HD, Bhoite UY, Bhoite SU, Gaikwad US, Shinde KP. Effect of genetic and non-genetic factors on first lactation reproduction and production traits in Phule Triveni cattle. J Pharmacogn Phytochem 2021;10(Special Issue 2):13-6.  https://doi.org/10.22271/phyto.2021.v10.i6a.14244
  5. Tamboli P, Bharadwaj A, Chaurasiya A, Bangar YC, Jerome A. Genetic parameters for first lactation and lifetime traits of Nili-Ravi buffaloes. Front Vet Sci 2021;8:557468. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2021.557468 
  6. Bhosale MD, Singh TP. Development of lifetime milk yield equation using artificial neural network in Holstein Friesian crossbred dairy cattle and comparison with multiple linear regression model. Curr Sci 2017;113:951-5. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26293962  https://doi.org/10.18520/cs/v113/i05/951-955
  7. Yadav N, Illa SK, Mukherjee S, Gujar G, Mukherjee A. Bayesian estimates for genetic and phenotypic parameters of growth traits in Sahiwal cattle. Trop Anim Health Prod 2023;55:30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-022-03446-7 
  8. Yadav N, Mukherjee S, Bhardwaj S, Togla O, Gujral S, Mukherjee A. Bayesian using gibbs sampling (bugs) algorithm for life time traits in sahiwal cattle. Rumin Sci 2022;11:15-20. 
  9. Cardoso Consentini CE, Wiltbank MC, Sartori R. Factors that optimize reproductive efficiency in dairy herds with an emphasis on timed artificial insemination programs. Animals 2021;11:301. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11020301 
  10. Crowe MA, Hostens M, Opsomer G. Reproductive management in dairy cows-the future. Ir Vet J 2018;71:1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13620-017-0112-y 
  11. Van De Schoot R, Broere JJ, Perryck KH, Zondervan-Zwijnenburg M, Van Loey NE. Analyzing small data sets using Bayesian estimation: The case of posttraumatic stress symptoms following mechanical ventilation in burn survivors. Eur J Psychotraumatol 2015;6:25216. https://doi.org/10.3402/ejpt.v6.25216 
  12. Nuzzo RL. An introduction to Bayesian data analysis for correlations. PM R 2017;9:1278-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmrj.2017.11.003 
  13. Plas JV. Frequentist and Bayesianism: the python-driven primer. Proceedings of the 13th Python in Science Conference; 2014 Jul 6-13; Austin, TX, USA. SciPy 2014 pp. 85-93. https://doi.org/10.25080/Majora-14bd3278-00e 
  14. Nunez-Torres OP, Almeida-Secaira RI. Quantitative genetics: principles of farming in livestock production. J Selva Andina Anim Sci 2022;9:23-36. https://doi.org/10.36610/j.jsaas.2022.090100023 
  15. Fahrmeir L, Tutz G. Multivariate statistical modelling based on generalized linear models. New York, NY, USA: Springer; 2001. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-3454-6 
  16. Gianola D, Foulley JL. Variance estimation from integrated likelihoods. Genet Sel Evol 1990;22:403. https://doi.org/10.1186/1297-9686-22-4-403 
  17. Wright DR, Stern HS, Berger PJ. Comparing traditional and Bayesian Analyses of selection experiments in animal breeding. J Agric Biol Environ Stat 2000;5:240-56. https://doi.org/10.2307/1400533 
  18. de Villemereuil P. On the relevance of Bayesian statistics and MCMC for animal models. J Anim Breed Genet 2019;136:339-40. https://doi.org/10.1111/jbg.12426 
  19. Sturges HA. The choice of a class interval. J Am Stat Assoc 1926;21:65-6. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1926.10502161 
  20. R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R version: 4.2.0. Vienna, Austria: R J; 2022. https://www.R-project.org/ 
  21. Harvey WR. Mixed model least squares and maximum likelihood computer program. 1990. 
  22. Misztal I, Perez-Enciso M. FSPAK90A Fortran 90 interface to sparse-matrix package FSPAK with dynamic memory allocation and sparse matrix structure. Proc. 6th World Cong. Gen Appl Livest Prod 1998;27:467-8. 
  23. Garcia-Cortes LA, Rico M, Groeneveld E. Using coupling with the Gibbs sampler to assess convergence in animal models. J Anim Sci 1998;76:441-7. https://doi.org/10.2527/1998.762441x 
  24. Gianola D, Foulley JL. Variance estimation from integrated likelihoods. Genet Sel Evol 1990;22:403. https://doi.org/10.1186/1297-9686-22-4-403 
  25. Geman S, Geman D. Stochastic relaxation, gibbs distributions, and the bayesian restoration of images. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 1984;6:721-41. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.1984.4767596 
  26. Chand T. Genetic evaluation of life time productivity in Tharparkar cattle [M.V.Sc. Thesis]. Bikaner, India: RAJUVAS; 2011. 
  27. Kishore K. Genetic evaluation of sires in Tharparkar cattle [M.V.Sc. Thesis]. Bikaner, India: RAJUVAS; 2012. 
  28. Mishra G, Siddiqui MF, Ingle VS, Meel MS. Studies on production performance of Tharparkar cattle at organised farm. Intl J Livest Res 2017;7:54-62. https://doi.org/10.5455/ijlr.20161227083133 
  29. Gahlot GC, Pant KP, Kachwaha RN. Source of variation in reproductive performance of Tharparkar cows in western Rajasthan. Indian J Dairy Sci 2002;55:224-9. 
  30. Pirzada R. Estimation of genetic parameters and variance components of milk traits in Holstein-Friesian and British-Holstein dairy cows. Kafkas Univ Vet Fak Derg 2011;17:463-7. https://doi.org/10.9775/kvfd.2011.3692 
  31. Hussain A, Gupta AK, Dash SK, Manoj M, Ahmad S. Effect of non-genetic factors on first lactation production and reproduction traits in Tharparkar cattle. Indian J Anim Res 2015;49:438-41. https://doi.org/10.5958/0976-0555.2015.00096.5 
  32. Panneerselvam S, Natarajan N, Thangaraju P, Iyue M, Rahumathulla PS. Genetic studies on productive and reproductive traits in Tharparkar cattle. Cheiron 1990;19:1-6. 
  33. Pirzada AHM. Performance appraisal in Tharparkar cattle [M.V.Sc. Thesis]. Karnal, India: NDRI; 2012. 
  34. Kumar V. Genetic evaluation of Tharparkar and Karan fries cattle for lifetime fertility, milk and milk constituents yields [Ph.D. Thesis]. Karnal, India: NDRI; 2016. 
  35. Sharma KNS, Singh S. Estimation of average productive life of cattle on a modern dairy farm. Indian J Anim Sci 1974;44:145-9. 
  36. Gahlot GC. Genetic evaluation of Tharparkar cattle [Ph.D. Thesis]. Bikaner, India: Rajasthan Agricultural University; 1999. 
  37. Pirzada AHM. Performance appraisal in Tharparkar cattle [M.V.Sc. Thesis]. Karnal, India: NDRI; 2012. 
  38. Choudhary G, Pannu U, Gahlot GC, Nehara M, Poonia NK. Genetic studies on lifetime traits of Tharparkar cattle at beechwal farm in bikaner. Int J Livest Res 2019;9:113-9. https://doi.org/10.5455/ijlr.20180904094939 
  39. Friedman N, Goldszmidt M, Wyner A. Data analysis with Bayesian networks: A bootstrap approach. In: Proceedings of the Fifteenth Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence; 1999. pp. 196-205. 
  40. Geweke J. Evaluating the accuracy of sampling-based approaches to the calculations of posterior moments. Bayesian statistics 1992;4:641-9. https://doi.org/10.21034/sr.148 
  41. Taneja VK, Basu SB, Bhatnagar DS. Genetic and phenotypic parameters of some measures of lifetime production and their relationship with milk yield in the first three lactations in Tharparkar cows. J Agric Sci 1982;98:461-5. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859600042015 
  42. Brito LC, Casellas J, Varona L, et al. Genetic evaluation of age at first calving for Guzera beef cattle using linear, threshold, and survival Bayesian models. J Anim Sci 2018;96:2517-24. https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/sky112 
  43. Costa EV, Ventura HT, Veroneze R, Silva FF, Pereira MA, Lopes PS. Estimated genetic associations among reproductive traits in Nellore cattle using Bayesian analysis. Anim Reprod Sci 2020;214:106305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2020.106305 
  44. Do C, Wasana N, Cho K, et al. The effect of age at first calving and calving interval on productive life and lifetime profit in Korean Holsteins. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci 2013;26:1511-7. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2013.13105 
  45. Zavadilova L, Stipkova M. Effect of age at first calving on longevity and fertility traits for Holstein cattle. Czech J Anim Sci 2013;58:47-57.  https://doi.org/10.17221/6614-CJAS
  46. Shin S, Lee J, Do C. Genetic relationship of age at first calving with conformation traits and calving interval in Hanwoo cows. J Anim Sci Technol 2021;63:740-50. https://doi.org/10.5187/jast.2021.e73