Animal Bioscience

  • 제36권12호
  • /
  • Pages.1918-1925
  • /
  • 2023
  • /
  • 2765-0189(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2765-0235(eISSN)
아세아태평양축산학회 (Asian Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The effect of biogas slurry application on biomass production and the silage quality of corn

  • Hua Sun (Jiangsu Coastal Area Institute of Agricultural Science) ;
  • Kai Shi (Jiangsu Coastal Area Institute of Agricultural Science) ;
  • Hairong Ding (Jiangsu Coastal Area Institute of Agricultural Science) ;
  • Chenglong Ding (Institute of Animal Science, Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences) ;
  • Zhiqing Yang (Jiangsu Coastal Area Institute of Agricultural Science) ;
  • Chen An (Jiangsu Coastal Area Institute of Agricultural Science) ;
  • Chongfu Jin (Jiangsu Coastal Area Institute of Agricultural Science) ;
  • Beiyi Liu (Institute of Animal Science, Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences) ;
  • Zhaoxin Zhong (Jiangsu Coastal Area Institute of Agricultural Science) ;
  • Xia Xiao (Jiangsu Coastal Area Institute of Agricultural Science) ;
  • Fuyin Hou (Jiangsu Coastal Area Institute of Agricultural Science)
  • 투고 : 2023.04.06
  • 심사 : 2023.07.19
  • 발행 : 2023.12.01
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Objective: The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of biogas slurry application on biomass production and the silage quality of corn. Methods: A field experiment was conducted in which corn was grown using different biogas slurry application rates. The effect of 25% to 500% biogas slurry nitrogen replacement (T1 to T14) on the yield and quality indices of corn were studied by field plot experiments. Results: The results revealed that biogas slurry application improved the stem diameter and relative feed value of corn silage in treatments T13 and T11. Moreover, the fermentation quality of corn silage was improved due to an increase in lactic acid content; in comparison with the chemical synthetic fertilizer (CF) group. The crude protein contents of corn silage had no obvious change with increasing biogas slurry application. However, the forage quality index of acid detergent fiber was decreased (p<0.05) in the T11 group compared with the CF group. In addition, higher (p<0.05) 30 h in vitro dry matter digestibility and 30 h in vitro neutral detergent fiber digestibility were observed in the T11 and T13 groups than in the CF group. Conclusion: Based on these results, it was concluded that the optimum biogas slurry application rate for corn was approximately 350% to 450% biogas slurry nitrogen replacement under the present experimental conditions.

키워드

과제정보

The authors are grateful to the Jiangsu Agricultural Science and Technology Innovation Fund (CX (21) 2017).

참고문헌

  1. 1.Chowdhury T, Chowdhury H, Hossain N, et al. Latest advancements on livestock waste management and biogas production: Bangladesh's perspective. J Clean Prod 2020;272:122818. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122818
  2. Holm-Nielsen JB, Al Seadi T, Oleskowicz-Popiel P. The future of anaerobic digestion and biogas utilization. Bioresour Technol 2009;100:5478-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2008.12.046
  3. Mao C, Feng Y, Wang X, Ren G. Review on research achievements of biogas from anaerobic digestion. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2015;45:540-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.02.032
  4. Kiyonori H. Animal waste problems and their solution from the technological point of view in Japan. 2011. Jpn Agric Res Q 1998;32:203-10.
  5. Carlson B. The Linkoping biogas project-waste to fuel. In Proceedings of the Anaerobic Digestion Conference; Galway, Ireland; 1999. p. 4-5.
  6. Tan F, Wang Z, Zhouyang S, et al. Nitrogen and phosphorus removal coupled with carbohydrate production by five microalgae cultures cultivated in biogas slurry. Bioresour Technol 2016;221:385-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2016.09.030
  7. Islam MR, Rahman SME, Rahman MM, Oh DH, Ra CS. The effects of biogas slurry on the production and quality of maize fodder. Turk J Agric For 2010;34:91-9. https://doi.org/10.3906/tar-0902-44
  8. Jothi G, Pugalendhi S, Poornima K, Rajendran G. Management of root-knot nematode in tomato Lycopersicon esculentum, Mill., with biogas slurry. Bioresour Technol 2003;89:169-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-8524(03)00047-6
  9. Chaoui HI, Zibilske LM, Ohno T. Effects of earthworm casts and compost on soil microbial activity and plant nutrient availability. Soil Biol Biochem 2003;35:295-302. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0038-0717(02)00279-1
  10. Olesen JE, Askegaard M, Rasmussen IA. Winter cereal yields as affected by animal manure and green manure in organic arable farming. Eur J Agron 2009;30:119-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2008.08.002
  11. Jiang L, Wang Q, Chen D, et al. Effects of paddy field disposal of biogas slurry on rice production, soil quality and environmental safety. J Agro-Environ Sci 2011;30:1328-36.
  12. Zheng X, Fan J, Cui J, et al. Effects of biogas slurry application on peanut yield, soil nutrients, carbon storage, and microbial activity in an Ultisol soil in southern China. J Soils Sediments 2016;16:449-60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-015-1254-8
  13. Rahman SME, Islam MA, Rahman MM, Oh DH. Effect of cattle slurry on growth, biomass yield and chemical composition of maize fodder. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci 2008;21:1592-8. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2008.80190
  14. Xu W, Zhu Y, Wang X, et al. The effect of biogas slurry application on biomass production and forage quality of Lolium multiflorum. Sustainability 2021;13:3605. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13073605
  15. Khan NA, Yu P, Ali M, Cone JW, Hendriks WH. Nutritive value of maize silage in relation to dairy cow performance and milk quality. J Sci Food Agric 2015;95:238-52. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.6703
  16. Li CJ, Xu ZH, Dong ZX, Shi SL, Zhang JG. Effects of nitrogen application rate on the yields, nutritive value and silage fermentation quality of whole-crop wheat. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci 2016;29:1129-35. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.15.0737
  17. Association of Official Analytical Chemists. Official methods for analysis, 18th edition. Arlington, VA, USA: AOAC; 2005.
  18. Novamsky I, Van Eck R, Van Schouwenburg C, Walinga I. Total nitrogen determination in plant material by means of the indophenol-blue method. Netherlands J Agric Sci 1974;22:3-5. https://doi.org/10.18174/njas.v22i1.17230
  19. Barker SB, Summerson WH. The colorimetric determination of lactic acid in biological material. J Biol Chem 1941;138:535-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9258(18)51379-X
  20. Saracoglu A, Saracoglu KT, Aylu B, Fidan V. Influence of integrated nutrients on growth, yield and quality of maize (Zea mays L.). Am J Plant Sci 2011;2:63-9. https://doi.org/10.4236/aips.2011.21009
  21. Garfi M, Gelman P, Comas J, Carrasco W, Ferrer I. Agricultural reuse of the digestate from low-cost tubular digesters in rural Andean communities. Waste Manag 2011;31:2584-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2011.08.007
  22. Muhmood A, Javid S, Ahmad Z, Majeed A, Rafique R. Integrated use of bioslurry and chemical fertilizers for vegetable production. Pak J Agric Sci 2014;51:565-70.
  23. Wentzel S, Joergensen RG. Effects of biogas and raw slurries on grass growth and soil microbial indices. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 2016;179:215-22. https://doi.org/10.1002/jpln.201400544
  24. Liang B, Zhao W, Yang X, Zhou J. Fate of nitrogen-15 as influenced by soil and nutrient management history in a 19-year wheat-maize experiment. Field Crop Res 2013;144:126-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2012.12.007
  25. Holman JD, Obour AK, Mengel DB. Nitrogen application effects on forage sorghum production and nitrate concentration. J Plant Nutr 2019;42:2794-804. https://doi.org/10.1080/01904167.2019.1659321
  26. Offer NW. A comparison of the effects on voluntary intake by sheep of dietary addition of either silage juices or lactic acid solutions of the same neutralizing value. Anim Sci 1997;64:331-7. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1357729800015903
  27. Owens V, Albrecht K, Muck R, Duke S. Protein degradation and fermentation characteristics of red clover and alfalfa silage harvested with varying levels of total nonstructural carbohydrates. Crop Sci 1999;39:1873-80. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1999.3961873x
  28. Schmidt RJ, Kung Jr L. The effects of Lactobacillus buchneri with or without a homolactic bacterium on the fermentation and aerobic stability of corn silages made at different locations. J Dairy Sci 2010;93:1616-24. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.20092555
  29. Bithi S, Sarder I, Khandaker ZH, Ershad SME, Ashraf A, Hossain MI. Effects of different doses of nitrogen fertilizer on yield and chemical composition of Zamboo grass. Pak J Biolo Sci 2004;7:1046-9. https://doi.org/10.3923/pjbs.2004.1046.1049
  30. Moorby JM, Dewhurst RJ, Evans RT, Danelon JL. Effects of dairy cow diet forage proportion on duodenal nutrient supply and urinary purine derivative excretion. J Dairy Sci 2006;89:3552-62. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(06)72395-5