대한건축학회논문집 (Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea)

대한건축학회 (Architectural Institute of Korea)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

시선추적을 활용한 공간이미지의 녹시율 차이 시지각 반응 평가

Evaluating Visual Perception Responses for Spatial Image of Greenness Index Using Eye Tracking

  • 최진경 (숭실대 일반대학원 실내디자인학과) ;
  • 김주연 (숭실대 건축학부 실내건축학)
  • Choi, Jin-Kyung (Dept. of Interior Design, Graduate School of Engineering, Soongsil University) ;
  • Kim, Ju-Yeon (Major of Interior Architectural Design, School of Architecture, Soongsil University)
  • 투고 : 2023.07.26
  • 심사 : 2023.10.04
  • 발행 : 2023.10.30
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Natural elements that give human physiological and psychological stability are applied to spatial planning to restore visual attention. In previous studies, it was said that space satisfaction and preference differ depending on the degree to which natural elements harmonize with space. By analyzing the gaze characteristics shown by space exploration and visual attention through eye tracking experiments, the difference in the Index of Greenness according to the experience of architecture and design education was confirmed.Visual stimuli have a difference in the Index of Greenness of spatial image a (0%), spatial image b (9.6%), and spatial image c (57.59%). The participants in the experiment were 64 Major (preliminary: 1, main: 63) and 67 Non-Major (preliminary: 1, main: 66). The gaze tracking experiment was presented for 123 seconds per spatial image and proceeded for a total of 369 seconds.It was confirmed that there was a lot of space exploration at the value of Saccade when there was experience according to architecture and design education. If there was no experience, the result of high visual attention concentration was found as the value of Fixation. As for the gaze characteristics of 'b' examined by the Fixation data,visual attention began to change from the middle of the experimental time when there was educational experience, and was the highest frequency at the end. If there was no educational experience, there was a change throughout the experiment time. The frequency was high in the time stage included in the middle and end. In the case of space exploration, when the Saccade data had educational experience, the most changes were seen at the end of the experimental time. Changes were confirmed in the early and mid-terms when there was no educational experience. The results of previous studies could be verified by analyzing numerical data through measured gaze data. This study conducted data analysis through gaze tracking experiments on the effect of natural factors on space preference. In spatial planning, basic data necessary for a psychologically stable spatial were provided.

키워드

과제정보

이 연구는 2022년도 한국연구재단 연구비 지원에 의한 결과의 일부임. 과제번호:NRF-2022R1A6A3A01087336

참고문헌

  1. Anderson, E. (1978). Visual resource assessment: Local perceptions of familiar natural environments. Ph. D. Dissertation. University of Michigan.
  2. Berman, M. G., Jonides, J., & Kaplan, S. (2008). The cognitive benefits of interactingwith nature. Psychological Science, 19(12), 1207-1212.
  3. Berman, M. G., Kross, E., Krpan, K. M., Askren, M. K., Burson, A., Deldin, P. J., et al.(2012). Interacting with nature improves cognition and affect for individualswith depression. Journal of Affective Disorders, 140(3), 300-305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2012.03.012
  4. Bratman, G. N., Daily, G. C., Levy, B. J., & Gross, J. J. (2015). The benefits of nature experience: Improved affect and cognition. Landscape and Urban Planning, 138, 41-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.02.005
  5. Cho, Y.H. (2003). Promoting green streetscape in Seoul. Seoul Development Institute.
  6. Choi, J.Y. (2016). Psychophysiological response according to the index of greenness of interior space. Thesis. Konkuk University.
  7. Choi, J. K. (2022). A Cognitive and Behavioral Response Model for Learning Spatial Visualization Based on Augmented Reality(AR), Ph. D. Dissertation, Soongsil University.
  8. Han, W. H., & Kim, J. Y. (2022). Comparison of Differences in Dimensional Perception of Augmented Reality Contents According to User Characteristics. Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea, 38(4), 109-120.
  9. Hartig, T., Evans, G., Jamner, L., Davis, D., & Garling, T. (2003). Tracking restorationin natural and urban field settings. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23(2),109-123. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-4944(02)00109-3
  10. Huang, S., Zhu, J., Zhai, K., Wang, Y., Wei, H., Xu, Z., & Gu, X. (2022). Do emotional perceptions of visible greeneries rely on the largeness of green space? A verification in Nanchang, China. Forests, 13(8), 1192.
  11. Ishii. A., & Sagawa, K. (2012). Psychological evaluation on the green-occupancy rate - The indoor outdoor comparison and the age-related change. Journal of the Color Science Association of Japan, 36, 114-115.
  12. Jimenez, M. P., DeVille, N. V., Elliott, E. G., Schiff, J. E., Wilt, G. E., Hart, J. E., & James, P. (2021). Associations between nature exposure and health: a review of the evidence. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(9), 4790.
  13. Kaplan, R. (1973). Predictors of environmental preference: Designers and "clients." In Environmental design research. W.F.E. Preiser, (ed.) Dowden, Hutchinson and Ross, Stroudsburg, Pa. 265-274.
  14. Kaplan, R. (1977). Down by the riverside: Informational factors in waterscape preference. In River recreation management and research symposium. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report NC-28. 285-289.
  15. Kaplan, S. (1979). Perception and landscape: conceptions and misconceptions. Proceedings of Our National Landscape.-Berkeley (USDA Forest Service) S, 241-248.
  16. Kaplan,R.(2001). The nature ofthe view from home: Psychological benefits. Environment & Behavior, 33(4), 507-542. https://doi.org/10.1177/00139160121973115
  17. Kim, E.I. (1998). A Study of sight-psychological effects by a color area of greenspace. Journal of Korean Inst. Landscape Architecture, 26(1), 36-43.
  18. Kim, J., & Kim, J. Y. (2020). Fixation differences in spatial visual perception during multi-sensory stimulation. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 132.
  19. Kim, J. H., & Han, H. R. (2008). A Study on Introducing of Green Interior Design for Cultural Space inside Seoul Subway Station. Journal of th Korean Institute of Interior Design, 7, 5-12.
  20. Kim, J. H., & Jung, J. Y. (2012). A study on the set-up of time range for typology of space observation characters. Korean Institute of Interior Design Journal, 21(4), 87-95.
  21. Kim, J. H., & Jung, J. Y. (2016). Method for extracting features of conscious eye moving for exploring space information. Korean Institute of Interior Design Journal, 25(2), 21-29. https://doi.org/10.14774/JKIID.2016.25.2.021
  22. Kim, J. H., & Kim, J. Y. (2018). The Visual Attention Characteristics and Observation Time of an Advertisement Image by Using Pupil Index. Journal of the Korean Soc. Living Environ. Sys, 25(2), 194-204. https://doi.org/10.21086/ksles.2018.04.25.2.194
  23. Kim, J. Y. (2016). An Analyzed the area of interest based on the visiting intention and existence of people in cafe space. Korean Institute of Interior Design Journal, 25(5), 130-139. https://doi.org/10.14774/JKIID.2016.25.5.130
  24. Kim, J. Y., & Park, J. S. (2017). An Analysis of AOI(Area of Interest) based on the Eye-Tracking Experiment according to Streetscape Elements, Korean Institute of Interior Design Journal, 26(5), 65-74.
  25. Kim, W.J., & Lee, T.K. (2021). An Analysis of the Interior Landscape of Subway Station for the Improvement of Index of Greenness in Subway Station Space - Focus on Busan Subway Stations -. Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea. 37(1), 35-46.
  26. Kuhnapfel, C., Fingerhut, J., Brinkmann, H., Ganster, V., Tanaka, T., Specker, E., Mikuni, J., Guldenpfennig, F., Gartus, A., Rosenberg, R., & Pelowski, M. (2023). How Do We Move in Front of Art? How Does This Relate to Art Experience? Linking Movement, Eye Tracking, Emotion, and Evaluations in a Gallery-Like Setting. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 1-61.
  27. Lee, H. G. (2018). The Impact of street characteristics on street greenness index - Focused on Yesan-gun. Thesis, Kongju National University.
  28. Lee, S. H., (2007), The Emotion-Improving Effects of the Index of Greenness: Focusing on Fascination Model and Restorative Environment Mode, Ph. D. Dissertation, ChungAng University.
  29. Lee, S. H., (2012), Testing for Additive Effects of Ambient Stressors in the Positive Relationship between Index of Greenness and Restorative Environment. Seoul Studies, 13(2), 187-205.
  30. Lu, Z., & Pesarakli, H. (2023). Seeing Is Believing: Using Eye-Tracking Devices in Environmental Research. HERD: Health Environments Research & Design Journal, 16(1), 15-52.
  31. Moon, B.K., Yang, J.Y., & Kim, J.Y. (2020). A Study on the Visual Attention of vision according to the observation Scope Users of the Underground Complex by Eye Tracker, Journal of the Korea Institute of Spatial Design, 15(4), 99-108.
  32. Newcombe, N. S. (2006). A plea for spatial literacy. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 52(26), B20.
  33. Oishi, Y., Tatumi, M., Taguchi, H., & Murai, H. (1996). Fundamental studies on the characteristics of electroencephalogram inspecting forest and grassland. J Jap Soc Reveget Tech, 21, 212-222.
  34. Osgood, C. E. (1964). Semantic differential technique in the comparative study of cultures. American anthropologist, 66(3), 171-200. https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1964.66.3.02a00880
  35. Park, S. Y., & Kim, J. Y. (2018). The Visual Perception Response for the Selection Process of Color Filter Preferences in Interior Space. Korean Institute of Interior Design Journal, 27(6), 196-206. https://doi.org/10.14774/JKIID.2018.27.6.196
  36. Pelowski, M., Leder, H., Mitschke, V., Specker, E., Gerger, G., Tinio, P. P. L., Vaporova, E., Bieg, T., & Husslein-Arco, A. (2018). Capturing aesthetic experiences with installation art: An empirical assessment of emotion, evaluations, and mobile eye tracking in Olafur Eliasson's "Baroque, Baroque!". Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1255.
  37. Posner, M.I. (1973). Cognition: An introduction. Scott, Foresman, Glenview, Ill. 208.
  38. Shin, W. S., & Shin, D. H. (2013). Analysis of Eye Movement by the Science Achievement Level of the Elementary Students on Observation Test. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 32(2), 185-197.
  39. Solso, R. L. (1994). Cognition and the visual arts. MIT press.
  40. Ulrich, R., Simons, R., Losito, B., Fiorito, E., Miles, M., & Zelson, M. (1991). Stress recov-ery during exposure to natural and urban environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 11(3), 201-230.
  41. Yarbus, A. L.,(1967). Eye Movements and Vision, New York : Plenum Press.
  42. Yeo, M. (2013). A Study on Facade Design Applying Gaze Frequency-Focusing on Eye-Tracking Experiment. Thesis, Kyungsung University.
  43. Yeom, S., Kim, H., Hong, T., Ji, C., & Lee, D. E. (2022). Emotional impact, task performance and task load of green walls exposure in a virtual environment. Indoor Air, 32(1), e12936.
  44. Yoo, M. (2013). The Impact of Modulized Interior Landscape on Office Workers 'Psychological Wellbeing. Thesis, Seoul Women's University.