Journal of Chest Surgery

The Korean Society for Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery (대한심장혈관흉부외과학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Clinical Efficacy of a Modified Surgical Procedure in the Treatment of Incompetent Great Saphenous Veins

  • Ki Pyo Hong (Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, National Health Insurance Service Ilsan Hospital)
  • Received : 2023.07.31
  • Accepted : 2023.08.21
  • Published : 2023.11.05
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical efficacy of a modified surgical procedure for the treatment of varicose veins. Methods: This retrospective analysis was conducted on lower extremities with symptomatic great saphenous vein (GSV) incompetence that underwent stripping from the groin to the knee, with preservation of the superficial epigastric vein (SEV), between January 2015 and April 2022. Follow-up assessments were performed using Doppler ultrasound, Venous Clinical Severity Score (VCSS), and the Aberdeen Varicose Vein Questionnaire (AVVQ) at 6 and 12 months after surgery. Results: The study included 179 limbs from 120 patients (47 men and 73 women). The mean patient age was 56.5 years (range, 20-78 years), and the distribution of preoperative Clinical-Etiology-Anatomy-Pathophysiology clinical classes was 8% C0-C1, 88% C2, and 4% C3-C6. The preoperative diameter of the saphenofemoral confluence averaged 6.9 mm (range, 2.7-15.8 mm). After a mean postoperative follow-up period of 24 months, evidence of neovascularization around the stump of the saphenofemoral junction (SFJ) was observed in 2 limbs (1.1%). Additionally, varicose vein recurrence was found in 1 limb (0.6%) and was associated with an incompetent thigh perforator. At postoperative follow-up, both VCSS and AVVQ scores were significantly lower than the preoperative scores. Conclusion: Modified surgical treatment of GSV incompetence, involving preservation of the SEV and stripping of a short segment up to the knee, demonstrated favorable clinical results in terms of postoperative complication rate, neovascularization rate around the SFJ stump, varicose vein recurrence rate, and improvement in lower extremity symptoms.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by a research grant from National Health Insurance Service Ilsan Hospital (NHIMC-2023-CR-035).

References

  1. Critchley G, Handa A, Maw A, Harvey A, Harvey MR, Corbett CR. Complications of varicose vein surgery. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 1997;79:105-10.
  2. Jones L, Braithwaite BD, Selwyn D, Cooke S, Earnshaw JJ. Neovascularisation is the principal cause of varicose vein recurrence: results of a randomised trial of stripping the long saphenous vein. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 1996;12:442-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1078-5884(96)80011-6
  3. van Rij AM, Jiang P, Solomon C, Christie RA, Hill GB. Recurrence after varicose vein surgery: a prospective long-term clinical study with duplex ultrasound scanning and air plethysmography. J Vasc Surg 2003;38:935-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0741-5214(03)00601-3
  4. Perrin MR, Labropoulos N, Leon LR Jr. Presentation of the patient with recurrent varices after surgery (REVAS). J Vasc Surg 2006;43:327-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2005.10.053
  5. Rutgers PH, Kitslaar PJ. Randomized trial of stripping versus high ligation combined with sclerotherapy in the treatment of the incompetent greater saphenous vein. Am J Surg 1994;168:311-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9610(05)80155-2
  6. Theivacumar NS, Dellagrammaticas D, Beale RJ, Mavor AI, Gough MJ. Fate and clinical significance of saphenofemoral junction tributaries following endovenous laser ablation of great saphenous vein. Br J Surg 2007;94:722-5. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.5804
  7. Pichot O, Kabnick LS, Creton D, Merchant RF, Schuller-Petroviae S, Chandler JG. Duplex ultrasound scan findings two years after great saphenous vein radiofrequency endovenous obliteration. J Vasc Surg 2004;39:189-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2003.07.015
  8. O'Donnell TF, Balk EM, Dermody M, Tangney E, Iafrati MD. Recurrence of varicose veins after endovenous ablation of the great saphenous vein in randomized trials. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord 2016;4:97-105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvsv.2014.11.004
  9. Geier B, Stucker M, Hummel T, et al. Residual stumps associated with inguinal varicose vein recurrences: a multicenter study. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2008;36:207-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2008.03.013
  10. Wallace T, El-Sheikha J, Nandhra S, et al. Long-term outcomes of endovenous laser ablation and conventional surgery for great saphenous varicose veins. Br J Surg 2018;105:1759-67. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.10961
  11. Fischer R, Chandler JG, De Maeseneer MG, et al. The unresolved problem of recurrent saphenofemoral reflux. J Am Coll Surg 2002; 195:80-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1072-7515(02)01188-2
  12. Pittaluga P, Chastanet S, Guex JJ. Great saphenous vein stripping with preservation of sapheno-femoral confluence: hemodynamic and clinical results. J Vasc Surg 2008;47:1300-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2008.01.042
  13. Pagano M, Passaro G, Flore R, Tondi P. Inferior selective crossectomy for great saphenous vein incompetence: our experience. Vascular 2021;29:290-6. https://doi.org/10.1177/1708538120947251
  14. Nyamekye IK. European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) 2022 clinical practice guidelines on the management of chronic venous disease of the lower limbs. J Med Vasc 2022;47:53-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdmv.2022.04.003
  15. Gloviczki P, Lawrence PF, Wasan SM, et al. The 2022 Society for Vascular Surgery, American Venous Forum, and American Vein and Lymphatic Society clinical practice guidelines for the management of varicose veins of the lower extremities. Part I. Duplex scanning and treatment of superficial truncal reflux: endorsed by the Society for Vascular Medicine and the International Union of Phlebology. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord 2023;11:231-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvsv.2022.09.004
  16. Pan Y, Zhao J, Mei J, Shao M, Zhang J. Comparison of endovenous laser ablation and high ligation and stripping for varicose vein treatment: a meta-analysis. Phlebology 2014;29:109-19. https://doi.org/10.1177/0268355512473911
  17. van der Velden SK, Biemans AA, De Maeseneer MG, et al. Five-year results of a randomized clinical trial of conventional surgery, endovenous laser ablation and ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy in patients with great saphenous varicose veins. Br J Surg 2015;102:1184-94. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.9867
  18. Erdinc I. Efficiency of endovenous laser and glue ablation methods in comparison with conventional surgery for the treatment of venous ulcers. Phlebology 2022;37:670-7. https://doi.org/10.1177/02683555221125384
  19. Carradice D, Samuel N, Wallace T, Mazari FA, Hatfield J, Chetter I. Comparing the treatment response of great saphenous and small saphenous vein incompetence following surgery and endovenous laser ablation: a retrospective cohort study. Phlebology 2012;27:128-34. https://doi.org/10.1258/phleb.2011.011014
  20. Leopardi M, Salerno A, Dante A, Cofini V, Necozione S, Ventura M. Endovenous laser ablation with 1,470-nm diode with tumescence anesthesia and saphenofemoral ligation: propensity score match comparison. Ann Vasc Surg 2019;58:302-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avsg.2018.11.029
  21. Marsden G, Perry M, Bradbury A, et al. A cost-effectiveness analysis of surgery, endothermal ablation, ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy and compression stockings for symptomatic varicose veins. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2015;50:794-801. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2015.07.034
  22. Hong KP. Prognosis of reflux of the below-knee great saphenous vein after surgical or endovenous treatment of reflux of the above-knee great saphenous vein. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord 2020;8:629-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvsv.2019.11.009