대한물리의학회지 (Journal of the Korean Society of Physical Medicine)

  • 제19권1호
  • /
  • Pages.143-154
  • /
  • 2024
  • /
  • 1975-311X(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2287-7215(eISSN)
대한물리의학회 (The Korean Society of Physical Medicine)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

근육뼈대계 환자보고식 결과 측정과 KCF의 연결: 물리치료 중심으로

Mapping between Musculoskeletal Patient-Reported Outcome Measures and KCF: Physical Therapy Perspective

  • Ju-Min Song (Department of Physical Therapy, Silla University)
  • 투고 : 2024.01.02
  • 심사 : 2024.01.18
  • 발행 : 2024.02.28
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

PURPOSE: The present study was conducted to improve the understanding of the Korean Standard Functional, Disability, and Health Classification (KCF) and its ease of use in the clinical domain of the musculoskeletal system by comparing, analyzing, and linking the KCF codes with items from patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), which are currently mainly used to evaluate patients with neck, shoulder, waist, and knee pain. METHODS: The items of the most widely used PROMs, the Neck Disability Index (NDI), Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) scores, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), and the codes of the KCF were linked by two experts according to the linking rules. RESULTS: The concordance between the items of each of the PROMs and the KCF code linked by the two experts was NDI,86.4%86.4%, DASH 83.3%, ODI 92.0%, and WOMAC 80.7%. The NDI, DASH, and WOMAC indexes were found to comprise items corresponding to physical function, activity, and participation areas, and were linked to 22, 43, and 31 KCF codes, respectively. In addition to these two areas, the ODI included items related to environmental factors and was linked to 25 codes (duplicated codes are treated as one). CONCLUSION: This research can be used by adding the KCF code to the questions of the currently used evaluation tool. This coding can be easily applied and will contribute to the easy understanding of the KCF.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. van Dulmen SA, van der Wees PJ, Bart Staal J, Braspenning JC, Nijhuis-van der Sanden MW. Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) for goalsetting and outcome measurement in primary care physiotherapy, an explorative field study. Physiotherapy. 2017 Mar;103(1):66-72.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physio.2016.01.001
  2. Shafiee E, MacDermid J, Farzad M, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of patient-rated wrist (and Hand) evaluation (PRWE/PRWHE) measurement properties, translation, and/ or cross-cultural adaptation. Disabil Rehabil. 2022;44(22):6551-65.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2021.1970250
  3. Churruca K, Pomare C, Ellis LA, et al. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs): a review of generic and condition-specific measures and a discussion of trends and issues. Health Expect. 2021;24(4):1015-24.  https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.13254
  4. Schellingerhout JM, Verhagen AP, Heymans MW, et al. Measurement properties of disease-specific questionnaires in patients with neck pain: a systematic review. Qual Life Res. 2012;21(4):659-70.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-011-9965-9
  5. Angst F, Schwyzer HK, Aeschlimann A, et al. Measures of adult shoulder function: Disabilities of the Arm, shoulder, and hand questionnaire (DASH) and its short version (QuickDASH), shoulder pain and disability index (SPADI), american shoulder and elbow surgeons (ASES) Society standardized shoulder assessment form, constant (Murley) score (CS), simple shoulder Test (SST), oxford shoulder score (OSS), shoulder disability questionnaire (SDQ), and western ontario shoulder instability index (WOSI). Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2011;63 Suppl 11:S174-88.  https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.20630
  6. Barrey CY, Le Huec JC. French society for spine surgery. chronic low back pain: relevance of a new classification based on the injury pattern. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2019;105(2):339-46.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2018.11.021
  7. Jeong HS, Lee SC, Jee H, et al. Proprioceptive training and outcomes of patients with knee osteoarthritis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Athl Train. 2019;54(4):418-28.  https://doi.org/10.4085/1062-6050-329-17
  8. Jung JH, Kang J-Y, Ko C-H, et al. Effect of Communication and education within the rehabilitation team: therapists' and nurses' views. Annals of Geriatric Medicine and Research. 2021;25(4):301. 
  9. Preede L, Soberg HL, Dalen H, et al. Rehabilitation goals and effects of goal achievement on outcome following an adapted physical activity-based rehabilitation intervention. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2021;15:1545-55.  https://doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S311966
  10. Korean standard classification of functioning, disability and. health. Statistics Korea. 2016. 
  11. Sirintrapun SJ, Artz DR. Health information systems. Surg Pathol Clin. 2015;8(2):255-68.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.path.2015.02.014
  12. Cieza A, Fayed N, Bickenbach J, et al. Refinements of the ICF linking rules to strengthen their potential for establishing comparability of health information. Disabil Rehabil. 2019;41(5):574-83.  https://doi.org/10.3109/09638288.2016.1145258
  13. Song JM, Lee HJ. Mapping items of functioning questionnaires into the international classification of functioning, disability and health: stroke. J Kor Phys Ther. 2016;28(5):341-7.  https://doi.org/10.18857/jkpt.2016.28.5.341
  14. Prodinger B, Tennant A, Stucki G. Standardized reporting of functioning information on ICF-based common metrics. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2018;54(1):110-7.  https://doi.org/10.23736/S1973-9087.17.04784-0
  15. Kim Mk. A case report of a patient with spinal cord infarction treated by Korean medicine combined with conventional medicine: An evaluation using Korean Standard Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (KCF). J Korean Med. 2018;39(3):89-100.  https://doi.org/10.13048/jkm.18028
  16. Song JM, Park SY. Development of the ICF/KCF code set the people with nervous system disease: based on physical therapy. J Kor Phys med. 2023;18(1):99-110.  https://doi.org/10.13066/kspm.2023.18.1.99
  17. Song JM, Choi NS. Korean standard classification of functioning, disability and health (KCF) code linking on natural language with extract algorithm. J Kor Phys med. 2023;18(1):77-86.  https://doi.org/10.13066/kspm.2023.18.1.77
  18. Choi NS, Song JM. Review of the computerization component for the utilization of ICF as a global protocol. J Kor Phys med. 2023;18(3):121-133.  https://doi.org/10.13066/kspm.2023.18.3.121
  19. Park M, Choi EJ, Jeong M, et al. ICT-based comprehensive health and social-needs assessment system for supporting person-centered community care. Health Inform Res. 2019;25(4):338-343.  https://doi.org/10.4258/hir.2019.25.4.338
  20. de Moura L, Dos Santos WR, Castro SSd, et al. Applying the ICF linking rules to compare population-based data from different sources: an exemplary analysis of tools used to collect information on disability. Disabil rehabil. 2019;41(5):601-12.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2017.1370734
  21. Cieza A, Fayed N, Bickenbach J, et al. Refinements of the ICF linking rules to strengthen their potential for establishing comparability of health information. Disabil Rehabil. 2019;41(5):574-83.  https://doi.org/10.3109/09638288.2016.1145258
  22. Song KJ, Choi BW, Choi BR, et al. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Korean version of the neck disability index. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010 Sep 15;35(20):E1045-9.  https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181df78e9
  23. Lee JY, Lim JY, Oh JH, et al. Cross-cultural adaptation and clinical evaluation of a Korean version of the disabilities of arm, shoulder, and hand outcome questionnaire (K-DASH). J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2008;17(4):570-4.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2007.12.005
  24. Jeon CH, Kim DJ, Kim SK, et al. Validation in the cross-cultural adaptation of the Korean version of the oswestry disability index. J Korean Med Sci. 2006;21(6):1092-7.  https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2006.21.6.1092
  25. Bae SC, Lee HS, Yun HR, et al. Cross-cultural adatation and validation of Korean Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) and Lequesne osteoarthritis indices for clinical research. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2001;9(8):746-750  https://doi.org/10.1053/joca.2001.0471
  26. Wiitavaara B, Heiden M. Content and psychometric evaluations of questionnaires for assessing physical function in people with neck disorders: a systematic review of the literature. Disabil Rehabil. 2018;40(19):2227-35  https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2017.1334096
  27. Lee HJ, Song JM. Mapping items of functioning questionnaires into the international classification of functioning, disability and health: low back pain. J Kor Phys Ther. 2016;28(5):321-7.  https://doi.org/10.18857/jkpt.2016.28.5.321
  28. Lee HJ, Song JM. Linking of items in two function-related questionnaires to the international classification of functioning, disability and health: Shoulder pain. J Kor Phys Ther. 2018;30(6):239-45.  https://doi.org/10.18857/jkpt.2018.30.6.239
  29. Roe Y, Soberg HL, and Bautz-Holter E et al. A systematic review of measures of shoulder pain and functioning using the international classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF). BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2013;14:73. 
  30. Lee HJ, and Song JM. Analysis of the characteristics of patients with chronic low back pain using the ICF concept. J Kor Phys Ther. 2013;25:282-7. 
  31. Wang P, Zhang J, and Liao W et al. Content comparison of questionnaires and scales used in low back pain based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health:a systematic review. Disabil Rehabil. 2012;34:1167-77.  https://doi.org/10.3109/09638288.2011.637602
  32. Cwirlej-Sozanska A, Bejer A, Wisniowska-Szurlej A, et al. Psychometric properties of the polish version of the 36-item WHODAS 2.0 in patients with low back pain. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(19):7284. 
  33. Krauss I, Katzmarek U, Rieger MA, et al. Motives for physical exercise participation as a basis for the development of patient-oriented exercise interventions in osteoarthritis: a cross-sectional study. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2017;53(4):590-602.  https://doi.org/10.23736/S1973-9087.17.04482-3
  34. Weigl M, Wild H. European validation of the comprehensive international classification of functioning, disability and health core set for osteoarthritis from the perspective of patients with osteoarthritis of the knee or hip. Disabil Rehabil. 2018;40(26):3104-12.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2017.1377295
  35. Varbakken K, Loras H, Nilsson KG, et al. Relative difference among 27 functional measures in patients with knee osteoarthritis: an exploratory cross-sectional case-control study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019;20(1):462. 
  36. Stucki G, Prodinger B, Bickenbach J. Four steps to follow when documenting functioning with the International classification of functioning, disability and health. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2017;53(1):144-9.  https://doi.org/10.23736/S1973-9087.17.04569-5
  37. Prodinger B, Stucki G, Coenen M, et al. The measurement of functioning using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: comparing qualifier ratings with existing health status instruments. Disabil Rehabi. 2019;41(5):541-8. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2017.1381186