Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea (대한건축학회논문집)

Architectural Institute of Korea (대한건축학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Analyzing the Relative Importance of Planning Elements in Green Smart Schools With Analytic Hierarchy Process

AHP 분석을 활용한 그린 스마트 미래학교 계획요소의 상대적 중요도 산정

  • 안용진 (서울과학기술대학교 건축학부) ;
  • 정해주 (서울과학기술대학교 일반대학원)
  • Received : 2024.01.10
  • Accepted : 2024.02.28
  • Published : 2024.03.30
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study aims to identify the planning elements of green smart schools and evaluate their relative importance. Initially, a brainstorming session was held with select professional groups specializing in architectural design and educational administration to establish the hierarchy of planning elements. Subsequently, utilizing the AHP method, the relative importance of these planning elements was analyzed based on expert surveys from school facility design practitioners. The results indicated that green schools (0.331) ranked highest in weight at the primary level, followed by mixed-use schools (0.310), smart class (0.207), and space innovation (0.152). In terms of overall composite weight, green energy (0.092), energy control systems (0.091), lifelong learning spaces (0.086), passive architecture (0.069), support from the local community (0.061), and CPTED of facilities (0.061) emerged as vital considerations. These findings suggest that planning guidelines for green smart schools should prioritize energy-efficient facilities and foster connections between school facilities and local communities.

Keywords

References

  1. Cho, S. E., Baik, S. K., & Bang, J. S. (2021). Improving Architecture Planning for the Green Smart Future Schools Program, Technical report 2021-4. Sejong, AURI. 60-74. 
  2. Cho, J. I. (2019). A study on the development of future school facilities criteria and automatic calculation space Program, Journal of Korean Educational Development Institute, 19(64). 
  3. Choi, M. C. (2020). Evaluation of analytic hierarchy process method and development of a weight modified model, Journal of Daehan Academy Of Management Information Systems, 39(2). 145-162. 
  4. Hong, J. Y. (2022, July 26). Ministry of education promoting 'Open to Residents of School Facilities' Concerns about "What to Do about Student Safety", JoongAng Ilbo, https://www.joongang.co.kr/article/25089824#home 
  5. Kim, M. K. (2022). Elementary school reconstruction design for embodiment of green-smart future school educational environment, Journal of Architectural Institute of Korea, 38(11). 187-198. 
  6. Kim, J. Y., & Lee, J. K. (2018). A study on the planning factors for future schools facilities, Journal of Architectural Institute of Korea, 38(1). 52-55. 
  7. Kye, B. K. (2016). Direction for designing future school, Journal of Korean Institute of Educational Facilities, 23(4). 18-22. 
  8. Lee, D. K. (2019). An exploration on direction of the space design to support teaching and learning in future school, Journal of Korean Institute of Educational Facilities, 26(5). 26-31. 
  9. Lee, K. S. (2016). Design approach for future school, Journal of Korean Institute of Educational Facilities, 23(4). 12-17. 
  10. Ministry of Education (2021). The Comprehensive Plans of Green Smart Future School 
  11. Park, J. L. (2018a). A study on the redesign of the future school -focus on the middle school facilities in old city, Incheon, Journal of Korean Institute of Interior Design, 20(3). 221-224. 
  12. Park, S. C. (2018b). A study on educational facilities in response to future educational environment(I) : A study on the restructuring of learner-centered school facilities, Technical Report, 2018-17. Jincheon, KEDI. 
  13. Park, S. Y., Choi, S. A., Koo, H. Z., & Sung, J. E. (2021). A System proposal for creating a creative convergence education environment based on smart city, Journal of Architectural Institute of Korea, 41(1). 208-211. 
  14. Saaty T. L. (1980). The analytic hierarchy process, McGraw-Hill, New York. 
  15. Seoul Metropolitan Office of Education (2021). A Study on Planning Guidelines for Green Smart Future Schools, Seoul Metropolitan Office of Education. 
  16. Son, H. Y. (2019, October 29). Despite 'support for school solar power'... 56% of applicants gave up halfway, Chosun Ilbo, https://www.chosun.com/site/data/html_dir/2019/10/29/2019102900187.html 
  17. Song, B. J., & Chu, B. (2011). A study for architectural planning of the school corresponding to the future society, Journal of Korean Institute of Interior Design, 20(1). 190-198. 
  18. Yoo, H. Y., Park, S. C., Lim, J. H., Han, D. B., & Jeong, J. W. (2021). The direction of pre-planned research on the school space innovation project following the introduction of the high school credit system, Journal of Architectural Institute of Korea, 37(8). 53-64. 
  19. Yu, W. S. (2020). School complex with social infrastructure - situations & issues, Journal of Korean Institute of Educational Facilities, 27(3). 7-10.