Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea (대한건축학회논문집)

Architectural Institute of Korea (대한건축학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Analyzing Recovery Effect Factors Among Residents in Public Rental Housing Complexes Across Age Groups - A Focus on Young Adults and Middle-aged Population -

공공임대주택단지 거주자 연령층에 따른 회복 효과 요인분석 - 청년과 중장년층을 중심으로 -

  • Lee, Seung-Hee (Dept. of Interior Architecture and Built Environment, Yonsei University)
  • 이승희 (연세대학교 실내건축학과)
  • Received : 2024.01.24
  • Accepted : 2024.02.29
  • Published : 2024.03.30
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study aims to examine the current status of facilities in residential environments for young and middle-aged residents within mixed-use public rental housing complexes, focusing on psychological recovery and identifying environmental factors influencing stress reduction. The investigation involved mixed-use public rental housing complexes in Seoul that received green building certification within the last decade, utilizing Roger Uhrich's Supportive Design Theory. To explore factors contributing to residents' psychological stress recovery effects, this study employed Harting's Perceived Restorativeness Scale (PRS) Measurement Tool, based on Kaplan & Kaplan's Attention Restoration Theory. This tool assessed factors like being away, fascination, compatibility, coherence, and legibility. The research delved into key factors influencing recovery effects on young and middle-aged residents in the housing complexes. Results revealed that, in terms of satisfaction, fascination and compatibility were the most influential factors for the young age group, determined through regression analysis. For the middle-aged group, coherence and being away emerged as the most influential factors. These findings provide groundwork for future detailed planning of recovery and well-being environments tailored to specific age groups of residents.

Keywords

References

  1. Cho, S. H. (2010). A basic direction of bogeumjari house design. Journal of the Korean Housing Association, 5(1), 12-17.
  2. Choi, I. Y. (2013). A Study on evaluation of shared space performance of apartment from daily Life space aspects, Ph.D. Dissertation, Busan University.
  3. Han, K. T. (2003). A reliable and valid self-rating measure of the restorative quality of natural environments. Landscape and Urban Planning, 64(4), 209-232. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(02)00241-4
  4. Hartig, T., Kaiser, F. G., & Bowler, P. A. (1997). Further development of a measure of perceived environmental restorativeness. Institutet for bostads-och urbanforskning.
  5. Hartig, T., Korpela, K. M., Evans, G. W., & Garling, T. (1996). Validation of a measure of perceived environmental restorativeness. (Goteborg Psychological Reports, 26: 7). Goteborg, Sweden: Department of Psychology, Goteborg University.
  6. Hartig, T., Mang, M., Evans, G. W., & Garling, T. (1997). A measure of restorative quality in environments. Scandinavian Housing and Planning Research, 14(1), 175-198. https://doi.org/10.1080/02815739708730435
  7. Heo, H. Y., & Park, S. B. (2015). A study on evaluation for the sensory design factors of outdoor spaces in apartment complexes. Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea, 31(2), 77-86.
  8. Herzog, T. R., Black, A. M., Fountaine, K. A., & Knotts, D. J. (1997). Reflection and attentional recovery as distinctive benefits of restorative environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 17(2), 165-170. https://doi.org/10.1006/jevp.1997.0051
  9. James, W. (1892). The sense of time. In W. James. Psychology: Briefer course, 280-286.
  10. Kaplan, S. (1995). The restorative benefits of nature toward an integrative framework. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 15(3), 169-182. https://doi.org/10.1016/0272-4944(95)90001-2
  11. Kaplan, R. (1984). Impact of urban nature: a theoretical analysis. Urban Ecology, 8(3), 189-197. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4009(84)90034-2
  12. Kaplan, R., & Kaplan, S. (1989). The experience of nature : A Psychological perspective, New York, Cambridge University Press. 52.
  13. Kaplan, R., Kaplan, S., & Ryan, R. L. (1998). With people in mind: Design and management of everyday nature. Island Press, Washington, DC.
  14. Kim, B. S., & Ryu, J. S. (2016). Route changes of our policy the public rental housing. The Journal of the Korea Contents Association, 16(9), 170-184.
  15. Kim, J. H., & Ahn, Y. J. (2018). Different Factors Affecting Resident Satisfaction by Types of Public Rental Housing: Empirical Evidence from the Seoul Public Rental Housing Panel Survey in 2016 (First Year). SH Urban Research & Insight, 8(1), 1~17.
  16. Kown, C. H., & Kim, J. Y. (2012). A study on the residential satisfaction of national sales and rental housing residents. Journal of The Residential Environment Institute of Korea, 10(3), 1-14.
  17. Lee, J. H. (2001). A Study on the differentiation of outdoor space in apartment complex. Master's thesis, Yonsei University.
  18. Lee, J. H. (2012). A Study on outdoor spaces of housing complex to promote social interaction of residents: Focusing on connection with natural environment, Thesis, Yonsei University.
  19. Lee, S. B. (2016). A Study on issues regarding improvement of the special act on public housing. Land Law Review, 74(1), 151- 179.
  20. Lim, K. H. (2008). A Study on the evaluation of residential environment of the outdoor space in apartment, Ph.D. Dissertation, Chosun University.
  21. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport (2017). Announcement of a housing welfare roadmap to build a socially integrated housing ladder. Retrieved May 02, 2021 from https://www.molot.go.kr/portal.do
  22. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport (2020). Changing my life, housing welfare 2.0 era with local residents. Retrieved May 02, 2021 from https://www.molot.go.kr/portal.do
  23. Oh, J. S., & Lee, S. W. (2018). An empirical study on the impact of tenure mixture on resident satisfaction of public rental houses. Journal of The Residential Environment Institute of Korea, 16(4). 243-256. https://doi.org/10.22313/reik.2018.16.4.243
  24. Oh, J. Y. (2022). Evidence-based research case analysis on the design factors of healing environment affecting the stress of space users. Korean Institute of Interior Design Journal, 31(1), 38-46. https://doi.org/10.14774/JKIID.2022.31.1.038
  25. The Seoul Institute (2020). 2019 Seoul City Housing Status Survey. Seoul
  26. Ulrich, R. S. (1983). Aesthetic and affective response to natural environment. In Behavior and the natural environment (pp. 85-125). Boston, MA: Springer US.
  27. Ulrich, R. S. (1984). View through a window may influence recovery from surgery. Science, 224(1), 420-421. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.6143402
  28. Ulrich, R. S. (1997). A theory of supportive design for healthcare facilities. Journal of healthcare design, 9(1), 3-7.
  29. Ulrich, R. S. (2002). Health benefits of gardens in hospitals. Conference of plants for people International Exhibition Floriade, 1-10.
  30. Ulrich, R. S., Simons, R. E., & Losito, B. D. (1991). Stress recovery during exposure to natural and urban environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 11(3), 201-230. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-4944(05)80184-7
  31. Whitehouse, S., Varni, J. W., Seid, M., Marcus, C. D., Ensberg, J. M., Jacobs, R. J., & Mehlenbeck, D. R. (2001). Evaluating a children's hospital garden environment: utilization and consumer satisfaction. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 21(3), 301-314. https://doi.org/10.1006/jevp.2001.0224