DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

An analytical approach for offshore structures considering soil-structure interaction

  • Ali Sari (Istanbul Technical University, Civil Engineering Department) ;
  • Kasim Korkmaz (Eastern Michigan University, College of Engineering and Technology)
  • Received : 2022.05.02
  • Accepted : 2024.01.16
  • Published : 2024.01.25

Abstract

This paper presents an advanced analytical approach for the design and analysis of fixed offshore structures with soil structure interaction considered. The proposed methodology involves conducting case studies to illustrate and assess the structural response of a structure considering seven different earthquakes, with the primary goal of ensuring there is no global collapse in the structures. The case studies focus on developing a model for structural analysis and its topside, incorporating nonlinear axial and lateral springs to capture soil-pile interaction. Additionally, mass and damping ratios are considered through the use of dashpots in the analyses. Finite Element Software was employed for structural analyses with detailed modeling, with soil spring nodes applied in the entire structure across various depths. After the finite element analysis was carried out, a sensitivity analysis was conducted to quantify and report the effects of different parameters.

Keywords

References

  1. Ajamy A., Asgarian B., Ventura C.E. and Zolfaghari M.R. (2018), "Seismic fragility analysis of jacket type offshore platforms considering soil-pile-structure interaction", Eng. Struct., 174(1), 198-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.07.066.
  2. Anis A., Ali M. and Kadim J.A. (2017), "Risks and proposed solutions for dynamic analysis of offshore structures", Int. J. Sci. Eng. Res., 8(7). 150-155.
  3. Ali, R. (2007), "Performance-based design offshore structures subjected to blast loading", Ph.D. Dissertation, Imperial College, London, U.K.
  4. Ali, T., Eldin, M.N. and Haider, W. (2023), "The effect of soil-structure interaction on the seismic response of structures using machine learning, finite element modeling and ASCE 7-16 methods", Sensors, 23(4), 2047.
  5. APIRP (2005), "American petrolium institute recommended practice 2A: WSD planning, designing, and constructing fixed offshore platforms working stress design", Technical Report, 22nd Edition, G2AWSD22.
  6. Asgarian B. and Agheshlui H. (2009), "Reliability-based earthquake design of jacket-type offshore platforms considering pile-soil-structure interaction", Am. J. Appl. Sci., 6(4). 631-637. https://doi.org/10.3844/ajas.2009.631.637.
  7. Azqandi M.S., Hassanzadeh M. and Arjmand M. (2019), "Sensitivity analysis based on complex variables in FEM for linear structures", Adv. Comput. Des., 4(1) 15-32. https://doi.org/10.12989/acd.2019.4.1.015.
  8. Baker J.W. (2015), "Efficient analytical fragility function fitting using dynamic structural analysis", Earthq. Spectra, 31(1), 579-599. https://doi.org/10.1193/021113EQS025M.
  9. Banda, E., Belton, R., Faleye, W., Holmes, N. and Spencer, A. (2003), "Design of a floating production, storage, and offloading (FPSO) system and oil offtake system for offshore west Africa", Research Report, Ocean Engineering Program, Civil Engineering Department, Texas A&M University, Texas, U.S.A.
  10. Billingham, J., Sharp, J.V., Spurrier, J. and Kilgallon, P.J. (2003), "Review of the performance of high strength steels used offshore" Health and Safety Executive, Research Report No. 105, Bedfordshire, U.K.
  11. Cai, J., Jiang, X. and Lodewijks, G. (2017), "Residual ultimate strength of offshore metallic pipelines with structural damage-a literature review", Ships Offshore Struct., 12(8), 1037-1055. https://doi.org/10.1080/17445302.2017.1308214.
  12. Cortijo, J., Duggal, A., Matos, S. and Dijk, R. (2003), "Design aspects of a dp system for FPSO applications in the GOM", Dynamic Positioning Conference, Houston, TX, U.S.A., September.
  13. Dong X., Lian J., Wang H. and Zhao Y. (2018), "Structural vibration monitoring and operational modal analysis of offshore wind turbine structure", Ocean Eng., 150(15), 280-297 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2017.12.052.
  14. England, R. (2015), "Offshore structural standards: the road to reliability", Ocean Resour. Mag., 12(1), 26-27.
  15. Ghanshyam, G.T., Vimal, J.S., Vivek, K.P. and Bureerat. S. (2017), "Topology, shape, and size optimization of truss structures using modified teaching-learning based optimization", Adv. Comput. Des., 2(4), 313-331. https://doi.org/10.12989/acd.2017.2.4.313.
  16. Ghorbani, A. and Eslami, A. (2023), "Numerical study of soil-structure interaction effects on the natural frequency of offshore wind turbines", Numer. Meth. Civil Eng., In Press. https://doi.org/1010.52547/NMCE.2022.451
  17. ISO 19901-2 (2000), "European standard for petroleum and natural gas industries: specific requirements for offshore structures - Part 2", Standard, Brussels, ICS: 75.180.10.
  18. Izzuddin, B. and Smith, D. (1997), "Response of offshore structures to explosion loading", Research report, Department of Civil Engineering, Imperial College, London, U.K.
  19. Jahanitaba,r A. and Bargi, K. (2018), "Time-dependent seismic fragility curves for aging jacket-type offshore platforms subjected to earthquake ground motions", Struct. Infrastruct. Eng., 14(2), 192-202. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2017.1343360.
  20. Jeong, S. and Ko, J. (2020), "The effects of anchored piles on the horizontal and uplift resistances in offshore structures", Ocean Eng., 197(9). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2019.106833.
  21. Joao T. and Hao H. (2014), "Dynamics of steel offshore platforms under ship impact", Appl. Ocean Res., 47(2), 352-372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apor.2014.07.004.
  22. Qasim, R. and Hasan, A.Q. (2020), "Investigating the behavior of offshore platform to ship impact", Civil Eng. J., 6(3) 495-511. https://doi.org/10.28991/cej-2020-03091486
  23. Ladeira, I., Marquez, L., Echeverry, S., Le Sourne, H. and Rigo, P. (2023), "Review of methods to assess the structural response of offshore wind turbines subjected to ship impacts", Ships Offshore Struct., 18(6), 755-774. https://doi.org/10.1080/17445302.2022.2072583
  24. Lyu, Z., Sakaguchi, M., Saruwatari, T. and Nagano, Y. (2021), "Static and seismic response analyses of new seismic integrated ceiling using FEM", Adv. Comput. Des., 6(4), 279-299. https://doi.org/10.12989/acd.2021.6.4.279.
  25. Mohamed, A. and Kadim, J.A. (2015), "The proposed method for the estimation of the pile critical length in clayey soil for offshore structures", Int. J. Soil Mech. Found., 2(1), 122-129. https://doi.org/10.15224/978-1-63248-062-0-80.
  26. Maedeh, P.A., Wu, W., Fonseca, A.V., Irdmoosa, K.G., Acharya, M.S. and Bodaghi, E. (2018), "A new approach to estimate the factor of safety for rooted slopes with an emphasis on the soil property, geometry and vegetated coverage", Adv. Comput. Des., 3(3), 269-288. https://doi.org/10.12989/acd.2018.3.3.269.
  27. Mendes, M.V., Colherinhas, G.B., Girao de Morais, M.V. and Pedroso, L.J. (2023), "Optimum TLCD for mitigation of offshore wind turbine dynamic response considering soil-structure interaction", Int. J. Struct. Stabil. Dyn., 2350187. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219455423501870
  28. Mohammadreza, G.M. and Mazloom, M. (2018), "Seismic response analysis of mega-scale buckling-restrained bracing systems in tall buildings", Adv. Comput. Des., 3(1), 17-34. https://doi.org/10.12989/acd.2018.3.1.017.
  29. Polatov, A.M., Ikramov, A.M. and Razmukhamedov, D.D. (2020), "Finite element modeling of multiplyconnected three-dimensional areas", Adv. Comput. Des., 5(3), 277-289. https://doi.org/10.12989/acd.2020.5.3.277.
  30. Rosyth, Q. (2004), "FPSO response to fast transient dynamic events", Research Report, Center for Marine Technology, Rosyth Royal Dockyard, U.K.
  31. Sari, A., Ramana, E., Cai, W., Nguyen, H. and Azimov, U. (2016). "Seismic sensitivity studies for fixed offshore platforms", Proceedings of the 50th Offshore Technology Conference, March, 22-25, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
  32. Sharifian H., Bargi K. and Zarrin M. (2015), "Ultimate strength of fixed offshore platforms subjected to near-fault earthquake ground vibration", Shock Vib., 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/841870.
  33. Shi, W., Liu, Y., Wang, W., Cui, L. and Li, X. (2023), "umerical study of an ice-offshore wind turbine structure interaction with the pile-soil interaction under stochastic wind loads", Ocean Eng., 273, 113984.
  34. Storheim, M., Alsos, H.S. and Amdahl, J. (2018), "Evaluation of nonlinear material behavior for offshore structures subjected to accidental actions", J. Offshore Mech. Arct. Eng., 140(4), 431-451. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4038585.
  35. Tremayne, B. and Kelly, T.E. (2005), "Time history analysis as a method of implementing performance based design", Proceedings of the NZSEE Conference, March, Auckland, New Zealand.
  36. Ushio, Y., Saruwatari, T. and Nagano, Y. (2019), "A new design method for site-joints of the tower crane mast by non-linear FEM analysis", Adv. Comput. Des., 4(4), 343-365. https://doi.org/10.12989/acd.2019.4.4.343.
  37. Yeter, B. and Garbatov, Y. (2022), "Structural integrity assessment of fixed support structures for offshore wind turbines: A review", Ocean Eng., 244, 110271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2021.110271
  38. Yu, Z. and Amdahl, J. (2018a), "A review of structural responses and design of offshore tubular structures subjected to ship impacts", Ocean Eng., 154(15), 177-203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2018.02.009.
  39. Yu, Z. and Amdahl, J. (2018b), "Analysis and design of offshore tubular members against ship impacts", Mar. Struct., 58(10), 109-135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marstruc.2017.11.004.
  40. Zarrin M., Asgarian B., Abyani M. (2018), "Probabilistic seismic collapse analysis of jacket offshore platforms", J. Offshore Mech. Arctic Eng., 140(3). https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4038581.