DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Random vibration-based investigation of required separation gap between adjacent buildings

  • Atefeh Soleymani (Department of Civil Engineering, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman) ;
  • Denise-Penelope N. Kontoni (Department of Civil Engineering, School of Engineering, University of the Peloponnese) ;
  • Hashem Jahangir (Department of Civil Engineering, University of Birjand)
  • Received : 2022.04.22
  • Accepted : 2024.03.04
  • Published : 2024.04.25

Abstract

Due to the imbalanced vibration of the adjacent buildings, the pounding phenomenon occurs as a result of an insufficient gap between them. Providing enough gap between adjacent structures is the most efficient approach to preventing the pounding effect. This paper calculated the required separation gaps between adjacent buildings, including two, four, eight, twelve and twenty stories steel moment-resisting frames, and investigated their related influencing parameters such as time periods, damping ratios, and the number of bays. The linear and nonlinear dynamic time-history analyses under real seismic event records were conducted to calculate the required separation gaps by obtaining relative displacement and velocity functions of two adjacent frames. The results showed that the required separation gap increased when the time periods of adjacent frames were not the same. The resulting separation gaps values of linear and nonlinear analyses were similar only for two and four stories frames. In other frames, the resulting separation gap values of linear analyses surpassed the corresponding nonlinear analyses. Although increasing the damping ratios in adjacent frames causes a decrease in the required separation gaps, the number of bays had no significant effect on them.

Keywords

References

  1. Abdel-Mooty, M. and Ahmed, N. (2017), "Pounding mitigation in buildings using localized interconnections", The 2017 World Congress on Advances in Structural Engineering and Mechanics, Ilsan, Korea, August-September.
  2. Ahmadi Taleshian, H., Mirzagoltabar Roshan, A. and Vaseghi Amiri, J. (2022), "Seismic pounding mitigation of asymmetric-plan buildings by using viscoelastic links", Struct., 36, 189-214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2021.11.036.
  3. Ahmadi Taleshian, H., Mirzagoltabar Roshan, A. and Vaseghi Amiri, J., (2020), "Use of viscoelastic links for seismic pounding mitigation under random input", Int. J. Struct. Integr., 11(3), 471-496. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSI-06-2019-0055.
  4. AISC 360-10 (2010), Specification for Structural Steel Buildings, Standard No. ANSI/AISC 360-10, American Institute of Steel Construction, Chicago, IL, USA.
  5. Ambiel, J.H.K., Brun, M., Thibon, A. and Gravouil, A. (2022), "Three-dimensional analysis of eccentric pounding between two-storey structures using explicit non-smooth dynamics", Eng. Struct., 251, 113385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.113385.
  6. ASCE 7-16 (2017), Associated Criteria for Buildings and Other Structures, American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, VA, USA.
  7. Baker, J.W. and Cornell, C. (2006), "Spectral shape, epsilon and record selection", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 35(9), 1077-1095. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.571.
  8. Brown, T. and Elshaer, A. (2022), "Pounding of structures at proximity: A state-of-the-art review", J. Build. Eng., 48, 103991. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JOBE.2022.103991.
  9. Chen, P. and Wu, X. (2022), "Investigations on the dynamic response of adjacent buildings connected by viscous dampers", Build., 12, 1480. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12091480.
  10. Daneshvar, M.H., Saffarian, M., Jahangir, H. and Sarmadi, H. (2022), "Damage identification of structural systems by modal strain energy and an optimization-based iterative regularization method", Eng. Comput., 39(3), 2067-2087. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-021-01567-5.
  11. Davenport, A.G. (1964), "Note on the distribution of the largest value of a random function with application to gust loading", Proc. Inst. Civil Eng., 28(2), 187-196. https://doi.org/10.1680/iicep.1964.10112.
  12. Efraimiadou, S., Hatzigeorgiou, G.D. and Beskos, D.E. (2013), "Structural pounding between adjacent buildings subjected to strong ground motions. Part I: The effect of different structures arrangement", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 42(10), 1509-1528. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2285.
  13. Eren, N., Sucuoglu, H. and Pinho, R. (2021), "Interstory drift based scaling of earthquake ground motions", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 50, 3814-3830. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.3534.
  14. FEMA (2000), Commentary for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings, FEMA-356, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, D.C., USA.
  15. Ghosh, S.K. and Dowty, S. (2003), "The seismic design provisions of the 2003 edition of the international building code", PCI J., 48, 92-95.
  16. Hao, H. and Zhang, S.R. (1999), "Spatial ground motion effect on relative displacement of adjacent building structures", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 28(4), 333-349. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(199904)28:4<333::AID-EQE820>3.0.CO;2-R.
  17. Hatzigeorgiou, G.D. (2010), "Behavior factors for nonlinear structures subjected to multiple near-fault earthquakes", Comput. Struct., 88(5), 309-321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2009.11.006.
  18. Jahangir, H. and Esfahani, M.R. (2020), "Investigating loading rate and fibre densities influence on SRG - concrete bond behaviour", Steel Compos. Struct., 34(6), 877-889. https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2020.34.6.877.
  19. Jahangir, H., Hasani, H. and Esfahani, M.R. (2021a), "Wavelet-based damage localization and severity estimation of experimental RC beams subjected to gradual static bending tests", Struct., 34, 3055-3069. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2021.09.059.
  20. Jahangir, H., Khatibinia, M. and Kavousi, M. (2021b), "Application of contourlet transform in damage localization and severity assessment of prestressed concrete slabs", J. Soft Comput. Civil Eng., 5(2), 39-68. https://doi.org/10.22115/SCCE.2021.282138.1301.
  21. Jankowski, R. (2009). "Non-linear FEM analysis of earthquake-induced pounding between the main building and the stairway tower of the Olive View Hospital", Eng. Struct., 31(8), 1851-1864. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENGSTRUCT.2009.03.024.
  22. Jankowski, R. (2012), "Non-linear FEM analysis of pounding-involved response of buildings under non-uniform earthquake excitation", Eng. Struct., 37, 99-105. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENGSTRUCT.2011.12.035.
  23. Jeng, V., Kasai, K. and Maison, B.F. (1992), "A spectral difference method to estimate building separations to avoid pounding", Earthq. Spectra, 8(2), 201-223. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1585679.
  24. Jin, N. and Yang, Y. (2018), "Optimizing parameters for anticollision systems between adjacent buildings under earthquakes", Shock Vib., 2018, 3952495. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/3952495.
  25. Karabork, T. (2020), "Optimization damping of viscous dampers to prevent collisions between adjacent structures with unequal heights as a case study", Arab. J. Sci. Eng., 45(5), 3901-3919. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-019-04307-6.
  26. Karayannis, C.G. and Favvata, M.J. (2005), "Inter-story pounding between multistory reinforced concrete structures", Struct. Eng. Mech., 20(5), 505-526. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2005.20.5.505.
  27. Kasai, K. and Maison, B.F. (1997), "Building pounding damage during the 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake", Eng. Struct., 19(3), 195-207. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(96)00082-X.
  28. Kheyroddin, A., Kioumarsi, M., Kioumarsi, B. and Faraei, A. (2018), "Effect of lateral structural systems of adjacent buildings on pounding force", Earthq. Struct., 14(3), 229-239. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2018.14.3.229.
  29. Kiureghian, A.D. (1980), "Structural response to stationary excitation", J. Eng. Mech. Div., 106(6), 1195-1213. https://doi.org/10.1061/JMCEA3.0002659.
  30. Kontoni, D.P. and Farghaly, A. (2018), "Seismic response of adjacent unequal buildings subjected to double pounding considering soil-structure interaction", Comput., 6(1), 10. https://doi.org/10.3390/computation6010010.
  31. Kontoni, D.P.N. and Farghaly, A.A. (2019), "The effect of base isolation and tuned mass dampers on the seismic response of RC high-rise buildings considering soil-structure interaction", Earthq. Struct., 17(4), 425-434. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2019.17.4.425.
  32. Licari, M., Sorace, S. and Terenzi, G. (2015), "Nonlinear modeling and mitigation of seismic pounding between R/C frame buildings", J. Earthq. Eng., 19(3), 431-460. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2014.984370.
  33. Lin, J.H. (2021), "Evaluation of critical separation distance to avoid seismic pounding between buildings: A spectral approach", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 50(11), 2863-2882. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.3476.
  34. Miari, M. and Jankowski, R., (2022), "Analysis of pounding between adjacent buildings founded on different soil types", Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng., 154, 107156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2022.107156.
  35. Miari, M., Choong, K.K. and Jankowski, R. (2019), "Seismic pounding between adjacent buildings: Identification of parameters, soil interaction issues and mitigation measures", Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng., 121, 135-150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2019.02.024.
  36. Mircea, G. (1981), "Mean-square structural response to stationary ground acceleration", J. Eng. Mech. Div., 107(5), 969-986. https://doi.org/10.1061/JMCEA3.0002758.
  37. NEHRP (2015), Recommended Seismic Provisions for New Buildings and Other Structures, FEMA P-1050, National Earthquake Hazards Reduction Program, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD, USA.
  38. OpenSees (2006), The Open System for Earthquake Engineering Simulation (OpenSees) User Command-Language Manual, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA.
  39. Patil, B.I., Biradar, B.B. and Doddamani, R. (2022), "Mitigation of seismic pounding observed in adjacent buildings with fluid viscous damper", Sustainability Trends and Challenges in Civil Engineering: Select Proceedings of CTCS 2020, Springer Singapore, Singapore.
  40. Penzien, J. (1997), "Evaluation of building separation distance required to prevent pounding during strong earthquakes", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 26(8), 849-858. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(199708)26:8<849::AID-EQE680>3.0.CO;2-M.
  41. Polycarpou, P.C., Papaloizou, L., Komodromos, P. and Charmpis, D.C. (2015), "Effect of the seismic excitation angle on the dynamic response of adjacent buildings during pounding", Earthq. Struct., 8(5), 1127-1146. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2015.8.5.1127.
  42. Raheem, S.E.A., Alazrak, T., AbdelShafy, A.G., Ahmed, M.M. and Gamal, Y.A. (2021), "Seismic pounding between adjacent buildings considering soil-structure interaction", Earthq. Struct., 20(1), 55-70. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2021.20.1.055.
  43. Raheem, S.E.A., Fooly, M.Y., Omar, M. and Zaher, A.K.A. (2019), "Seismic pounding effects on the adjacent symmetric buildings with eccentric alignment", Earthq. Struct., 16(6), 715-726. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2019.16.6.715.
  44. Rahimi, S. and Soltani, M. (2022), "A probabilistic seismic demand model for required separation distance of adjacent structures", Earthq. Struct., 22(2), 147-155. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2022.22.2.147.
  45. SAP2000® Version 17 (2015), Integrated Software for Structural Analysis and Design, Computers and Structures, Inc., Walnut Creek, CA, USA.
  46. Skrekas, P., Sextos, A. and Giaralis, A. (2014), "Influence of bi-directional seismic pounding on the inelastic demand distribution of three adjacent multi-storey R/C buildings", Earthq. Struct., 6(1), 71-87. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2014.6.1.071.
  47. Soleymani, A. and Esfahani, M.R. (2019), "Effect of concrete strength and thickness of flat slab on preventing of progressive collapse caused by elimination of an internal column", J. Struct. Constr. Eng., 6(1), 24-40. https://doi.org/10.22065/JSCE.2017.98444.1335.
  48. Strek, A.M., Lasowicz, N., Kwiecien, A., Zajac, B. and Jankowski, R. (2021), "Highly dissipative materials for damage protection against earthquake-induced structural pounding", Mater., 14(12), 3231. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14123231.