East Asian Economic Review

Korea Institute for International Economic Policy (대외경제정책연구원)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Environmental and Economic Impact of Trade between South Korea and the United States

  • Received : 2023.10.06
  • Accepted : 2024.02.01
  • Published : 2024.03.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This paper analyses carbon emissions and value-added embodied in trade between two large developed countries, South Korea and the United States, during 2000-2014. Using multi-regional input-output (MRIO) tables, our analysis reveals that carbon emissions and value-added embodied in exports grew by 19% and 101% for South Korea but shrank by 43% and 7% for the United States. As a result, South Korea experienced a 40% increase in net carbon exports and 243% increase in net value-added exports. At the industry level, the primary drivers of changes in carbon exports were electricity and basic materials. The majority of industries in witnessed improvements in carbon intensities suggesting improved environmental efficiency. While both countries achieved a decoupling of carbon emissions from value-added exports, substantial year-to-year and sectoral variations were observed. Finally, structural decomposition analysis indicates that domestic supply-side factors played a role in decreasing emissions whereas foreign demand-side factors contributed to emissions increases. In line with the main findings, various implications for policy and future research are discussed.

Keywords

References

  1. Chen, J., Wang, P., Cui, L., Huang, S. and M. Song. 2018. "Decomposition and decoupling analysis of CO2 emissions in OECD." Applied Energy, vol. 231, pp. 937-950. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.09.179
  2. Corsatea, T. D., Lindner, S., Arto, I., Roman, M. V., Rueda-Cantuche, J. M., Velazquez Afonso, A., Amores, A. F. and F. Neuwahl. 2019. "World Input-output Database Environmental Accounts (update 2000-2016)." JRC Techinical Report, no. JRC116234. European Commission, Joint Research Centre.
  3. Dietzenbacher, E. and B. Los. 1998. "Structural decomposition techniques: Sense and sensitivity." Economic Systems Research, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 307-324. https://doi.org/10.1080/09535319800000023
  4. Duarte, R., Pinilla, V. and A. Serrano. 2018. "Factors driving embodied carbon in international trade: A multiregional input-output gravity model." Economic Systems Research, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 545-566. https://doi.org/10.1080/09535314.2018.1450226
  5. Feng, L., Chen, B., Hayat, T., Alsaedi, A. and B. Ahmad. 2017. "The driving force of water footprint under the rapid urbanization process: a structural decomposition analysis for Zhangye city in China." Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 163, suppl. 1, pp. S322-S328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.047
  6. Huang, R., Lenzen, M. and A. Malik. 2019. "CO2 emissions embodied in China's export." Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, vol. 28, no. 8, pp. 919-934. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638199.2019.1612460
  7. Huang, Q., Xia, X., Liang, X., Liu, Y. and Y. Li. 2022. "Is China's Equipment Manufacturing Export Carbon Emissions Decoupled from Export Growth?" Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 85-97. https://doi.org/10.15244/pjoes/139098
  8. Kim, T. J. and N. Tromp. 2021. "Analysis of carbon emissions embodied in South Korea's international trade: Production-based and consumption-based perspectives." Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128839
  9. Kim, Y. G., Yoo, J. and W. Oh. 2015. "Driving forces of rapid CO2 emissions growth: A case of Korea." Energy Policy, vol. 82, pp. 144-155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2015.03.017
  10. Lan, J., Malik, A., Lenzen, M., McBain, D. and K. Kanemoto. 2016. "A structural decomposition analysis of global energy footprints." Applied Energy, vol. 163, pp. 436-451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.10.178
  11. Li, R. and S. Ge. 2022. "Towards economic value-added growth without carbon emission embodied growth in North-North trade-An empirical analysis of US-German trade." Environmental Science and Pollution Research, vol. 29, pp. 43874-43890. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-17461-y
  12. Liu, H., Lackner, K. and X. Fan. 2020. "Value-added involved in CO2 emissions embodied in global demand-supply chains." Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, vol. 64, no. 1, pp. 76-100. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2020.1750352
  13. Miller, R. E. and P. D. Blair. 2009. Input-output analysis: foundations and extensions. Cambridge University Press.
  14. Nagengast, A. J. and R. Stehrer. 2016. "The great collapse in value added trade." Review of International Economics, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 392-421. https://doi.org/10.1111/roie.12218
  15. OECD. 2021. "Carbon dioxide emissions embodied in international trade [Data set]." https://stats.oecd.org/Index.aspx?DataSetCode=IO_GHG_2021 (accessed March 30, 2023)
  16. Statistics Korea. 2023. "Power generation by energy source [Data set]." https://kosis.kr/statHtml/statHtml.do?orgId=388&tblId=TX_38803_A016A&vw_cd=MT_ZTITLE&list_id=388_38803_004&seqNo=&lang_mode=ko&language=kor&obj_var_id=&itm_id=&conn_path=MT_ZTITLE (in Korean, accessed January 16, 2024)
  17. Su, B. and B. W. Ang. 2012. "Structural decomposition analysis applied to energy and emissions: Some methodological developments." Energy Economics, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 177-188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2011.10.009
  18. Su, B. and B. W. Ang. 2017. "Multiplicative structural decomposition analysis of aggregate embodied energy and emission intensities." Energy Economics, vol. 65, pp. 137-147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2017.05.002
  19. Tan, H., Sun, A. and H. Lau. 2013. "CO2 embodiment in China-Australia trade: The drivers and implications." Energy Policy, vol, 61, pp. 1212-1220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.06.048
  20. Tapio, P. 2005. "Towards a theory of decoupling: degrees of decoupling in the EU and the case of road traffic in Finland between 1970 and 2001." Transport Policy, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 137-151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2005.01.001
  21. Tasbasi, A. 2021. "A threefold empirical analysis of the relationship between regional income inequality and water equity using Tapio decoupling model, WPAT equation, and the local dissimilarity index: evidence from Bulgaria." Environmental Science and Pollution Research, vol. 28, pp. 4352-4365. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-10828-7
  22. Timmer, M. P., Los, B., Stehrer, R. and G. J. de Vries. 2016. "An anatomy of the global trade slowdown based on the WIOD 2016 release." GGDC Research Memorandum, no. 162. Groningen Growth and Development Centre, University of Groningen. https://www.rug.nl/ggdc/iframe/memoranda
  23. UNCTAD. 2023. "Trade structure by partner [Infographic]." https://hbs.unctad.org/trade-structure-by-partner (accessed March 30, 2023)
  24. Wang, Q. and X. Han. 2021. "Is decoupling embodied carbon emissions from economic output in Sino-US trade possible?" Technological Forecasting and Social Change, vol. 169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120805
  25. Wang, Q. and F. Jiang. 2019. "Drivers of United States oil footprints trajectory: A global assessment." Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118150
  26. Wang, Q., Jiang, R. and R. Li. 2018. "Decoupling analysis of economic growth from water use in City: A case study of Beijing, Shanghai, and Guangzhou of China." Sustainable Cities and Society, vol. 41, pp. 86-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2018.05.010
  27. Wang, Q. and X. Yang. 2020. "Imbalance of carbon embodied in South-South trade: Evidence from China-India trade." Science of The Total Environment, vol. 707. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134473
  28. Wang, Q. and Y. Zhou. 2019. "Imbalance of carbon emissions embodied in the US-Japan trade: temporal change and driving factors." Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117780
  29. World Bank, 2023. "World Development Indicators [Data set]." https://databank.worldbank.org/source/world-development-indicators (accessed March 30, 2023)
  30. World Integrated Trade Solution (WITS). 2023. "Trade statistics by country [Data set]." https://wits.worldbank.org/countrystats.aspx?lang=en (accessed March 30, 2023)
  31. Yoon, Y., Kim, Y. K. and J. Kim. 2020. "Embodied CO2 Emission Changes in Manufacturing Trade: Structural Decomposition Analysis of China, Japan, and Korea." Atmosphere, vol. 11, no. 6. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos11060597
  32. Yu, Y. and F. Chen. 2017. "Research on carbon emissions embodied in trade between China and South Korea." Atmospheric Pollution Research, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 56-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apr.2016.07.007
  33. Zhang, B., Zhai, G., Sun, C. and S. Xu. 2021. Re-calculation, decomposition and responsibility sharing of embodied carbon emissions in Sino-Korea trade: a new value-added perspective. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, vol. 57, no. 4, pp. 1034-1049. https://doi.org/10.1080/1540496X.2019.1673161
  34. Zhao, Y., Shi, Q., Li, H., Cao, Y., Qian, Z. and S. Wu. 2020. "Temporal and spatial determinants of carbon intensity in exports of electronic and optical equipment sector of China." Ecological Indicators, vol. 116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106487
  35. Zhao, Y., Wang, S., Zhang, Z., Liu, Y. and A. Ahmad. 2016. "Driving factors of carbon emissions embodied in China-US trade: a structural decomposition analysis." Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 131, pp. 678-689. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.114